Targeting histamine receptor 4 in cholinergic urticaria with izuforant (LEO 152020): results from a phase IIa randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: Cholinergic urticaria (CholU) is a common subtype of chronic inducible urticaria, where signs and symptoms (e.g. pruritic wheals and angioedema) are triggered by sweating due to physical exercise, passive warming and by other sweat-inducing situations. While guidelines recommend treatment with second-generation H1 antihistamines, approximately 90% of patients report uncontrolled disease. Targeting the histamine 4 receptor (H4R) has shown promise in preclinical/clinical studies of allergic/inflammatory diseases. Izuforant (LEO 152020) is a selective oral H4R antagonist with expected dual antipruritic and anti-inflammatory effects. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of izuforant in adults with CholU, a common type of chronic urticaria driven by histamine and characterized by high skin levels of H4R expression. METHODS: This was a phase IIa randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre crossover trial where patients with CholU with an inadequate response to ≥ 1 standard dose of H1 antihistamine received izuforant 100 mg twice daily or placebo (EUCTR2020-004961-38-DE; NCT04853992). The primary endpoint was change from baseline in Urticaria Activity Score. Exploratory endpoints included CholU activity score over 7 days, urticaria control test, Physician Global Assessment, patient global assessment of severity (PGA-S), provocation tests, Dermatology Life Quality Index and CholU quality of life (CholU-QoL). Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, and serum biomarkers were assessed, as well as safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were randomized and included in the full analysis set; 18 completed treatment [mean (SD) age 29.5 (9.8) years; mean (SD) CholU duration 8.0 (6.3) years]. The primary and most of prespecified exploratory endpoints were not met; there were significant improvements in PGA-S for izuforant vs. placebo (P = 0.02), and nonsignificant improvements for other endpoints in quality of life and histamine skin prick test. All adverse events (AEs) experienced with izuforant were considered mild. The most frequently reported (> 1 patient) were nausea (three patients) and upper abdominal pain (two patients), occurring more frequently with izuforant vs. placebo (one patient each). There were no treatment-related serious AEs and no patient receiving izuforant discontinued the study. Treatment with izuforant did not cause downregulation of H4R. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to explore the role of H4R as a therapeutic target in urticaria. Targeting H4R with izuforant was well tolerated but did not demonstrate significant improvements vs. placebo in the primary endpoint and all but one prespecified exploratory endpoint in CholU.

Cholinergic urticaria (CholU) is a common subtype of an inflammatory skin condition called chronic inducible urticaria, where signs and symptoms (e.g. hives and swelling in the skin) are triggered by sweating caused by physical exercise, passive warming and other sweat-inducing situations. While guidelines recommend treatment with second-generation H1 antihistamines (a type of medication), approximately 90% of people with the condition report that these medications do not control the disease. Targeting the histamine 4 receptor (H4R) has shown promise in studies of allergic/inflammatory diseases. CholU is driven by histamine (a chemical released in the body) and characterized by high skin levels of H4R. Izuforant is a medication that may reduce itch and inflammation. In our study, which was carried out across multiple sites in Germany, we assessed the effects of izuforant 100 mg in 18 patients with CholU using a range of measures covering symptom control, disease severity, provocation response and quality of life. The primary endpoint (the main result measured at the end of the study to see if the treatment worked) was change from baseline in the post-provocation Urticaria Activity Score, where areas of skin were provoked and the time until common symptoms of CholU appeared (sweating and whealing (hives)) was measured. Overall, the primary endpoint and most of the exploratory endpoints were not met. There were significant improvements in patients' global assessment for izuforant versus placebo. This was the first study to explore the role of H4R as a therapeutic target in urticaria. Our findings suggest that targeting H4R with izuforant was well tolerated but did not demonstrate significant improvements versus placebo in the primary endpoint, and all but one prespecified exploratory endpoint in CholU.

Positive Basophil Tests Are Linked to High Disease Activity and Other Features of Autoimmune Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is believed to be Autoimmune (aiCSU) (type IIb CSU) in at least 8% of patients, associated with mast cell-activating IgG autoantibodies. Basophil tests such as the basophil activation test (BAT) and basophil histamine release assay (BHRA) are considered the best single tests for an aiCSU diagnosis. To date, the strength of associations among a positive BAT and/or BHRA (BAT/BHRA+) and CSU features, patient demographics, and response to treatment remains poorly characterized. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the strength of current evidence on basophil tests as parameters for CSU characteristics. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search and review to assess the relationship between BAT/BHRA+ and clinical and laboratory parameters of CSU. Of 1,058 records found in the search, 94 studies were reviewed by experts in urticaria and 42 were included in the analysis. RESULTS: In CSU patients, BAT/BHRA+ showed a strong level of evidence for an association with high disease activity and low levels of total IgE. A weak level of evidence was shown for the association of BAT/BHRA+ and the presence of angioedema, and basopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that aiCSU defined by BAT/BHRA+ is more active or severe and is linked to other aiCSU markers such as low total IgE/basopenia. Basophil tests should be standardized and implemented in routine clinical care to improve the diagnosis and treatment of patients with aiCSU.

Anti-KIT antibody, barzolvolimab, reduces skin mast cells and disease activity in chronic inducible urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) is characterized by mast cell (MC)-mediated wheals in response to triggers: cold in cold urticaria (ColdU) and friction in symptomatic dermographism (SD). KIT receptor activation by stem cell factor (SCF) is essential for MC function. Barzolvolimab (CDX-0159) is a humanized antibody that inhibits KIT activation by SCF and was well tolerated in healthy volunteers with dose-dependent plasma tryptase suppression indicative of systemic mast cell ablation. METHODS: This is an open-label, trial in patients with antihistamine refractory ColdU or SD, receiving one IV dose of barzolvolimab (3 mg/kg), with a 12-week follow-up. Primary endpoint was safety/tolerability; pharmacodynamic (PD)/clinical endpoints included serum tryptase, plasma SCF, skin MC histology, provocation tests, urticaria control test (UCT), and dermatology life quality index (DLQI). RESULTS: Analysis populations were safety (n = 21) and pharmacodynamics/clinical activity (n = 20). Barzolvolimab was well tolerated; most adverse events were mild and resolved. Treatment resulted in significant depletion of skin MCs, decreased tryptase (

Evidence for histamine release in chronic inducible urticaria - A systematic review.

Background: Chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) constitutes a group of nine different CIndUs in which pruritic wheals and/or angioedema occur after exposure to specific and definite triggers. Histamine released from activated and degranulating skin mast cells is held to play a key role in the pathogenesis of CIndU, but evidence to support this has, as of yet, not been reviewed systematically or in detail. We aim to characterize the role and relevance of histamine in CIndU. Methods: We systematically searched 3 electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Embase) for studies that reported increased serum or skin histamine concentration (direct evidence) or in vitro or ex vivo histamine release (indirect evidence) following trigger exposure. Results: An initial total of 3,882 articles was narrowed down to 107 relevant studies of which 52 were in cold urticaria, 19 in cholinergic urticaria, 14 in heat urticaria, 10 in contact urticaria, 7 each in solar urticaria and vibratory angioedema, 4 each in symptomatic dermographism and aquagenic urticaria, and 3 in delayed pressure urticaria. The results of our review support that histamine has a key pathogenic role in the pathogenesis of all CIndUs, but it is not the sole mediator as evidenced by the often poor relationship between the level of histamine and severity of symptoms and the variable clinical efficacy of H1-antihistamines. Conclusions: Histamine released from skin mast cells is a key driver of the development of signs and symptoms and a promising therapeutic target in CIndU.

Disease Impact, Diagnostic Delay, and Unmet Medical Needs of Patients With Cholinergic Urticaria in German-Speaking Countries.

Background: Cholinergic urticaria (CholU) is a common type of chronic inducible urticaria. Little is known about the burden of the disease and its unmet medical needs. Aim: To characterize the unmet medical needs of patients with CholU. Methods: Patients with CholU (n = 111) took part in a German online survey that assessed their symptoms, diagnostic delay, impact on daily life, quality of life (QoL), and their experience with physician care. Results: Virtually all patients reported typical signs and symptoms of CholU, i.e., whealing (93.7%) and itching (91.9%), in response to typical trigger situations, such as physical activity, passive warming, or stress. Despite this, patients reported a marked diagnostic delay of 30.2 months (range from 0 to 279 months). Only 38% of the patients received a blood examination, and only 16% underwent provocation testing for diagnosing CholU, as recommended by the international guidelines. Physician contacts were common, but patient satisfaction with their disease management was low. In total, 90.1% of the patients stated to have an uncontrolled disease, resulting in a strong impact on their everyday activities, sleep, and QoL. Conclusion: Patients with CholU exhibit many important unmet needs, and improvement in the diagnostic workup and patient care is needed, as are better treatment options.

Lanadelumab Efficacy, Safety, and Injection Interval Extension in HAE: A Real-Life Study.

BACKGROUND: Lanadelumab has been available in Germany for the prophylactic treatment of hereditary angioedema since February 2019. OBJECTIVE: To investigate real-life treatment outcome of lanadelumab and gain practical experience in adapting the therapy to individual patients. METHODS: The study included 34 patients. In 24 patients with hereditary angioedema and 4 patients with angioedema due to acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency, the previous treatment was switched to lanadelumab. In 6 patients with hereditary angioedema, lanadelumab from the open-label Hereditary Angioedema Long-term Prophylaxis study was continued in regular care. During the transition, patients were monitored using the angioedema control test and the angioedema quality of life questionnaire. At the time at which patients became symptom-free, the dosage interval was increased gradually (+3 days). RESULTS: On average, the angioedema control test values improved from 7.5 (poorly controlled disease) to 14.9 (well-controlled disease), and all patients showed adequate disease control. All treated patients, except 1 outlier, scored angioedema quality of life questionnaire values representing only a slight reduction in quality of life (mean, 14 points). At the time point of data collection, 9 patients used an average fixed injection interval of 30 days. Twenty-two patients were symptom-free from the beginning of the treatment phase and intended to extend their injection interval from 30 to 32.5 days (median). We recommended reducing the initial dosing interval from 24 to 21 days (median) to 3 patients because of intermediately occurring symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Gradual extension of injection intervals of lanadelumab presented in this study can minimize the burden of therapy without losing efficacy.