Long-term efficacy and safety of once-daily fosamprenavir 1400 mg boosted by ritonavir 100 mg: the BOLD100 study.

In a retrospective database study at two HIV treatment centres, medical records were accessed to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety parameters in all HIV-infected adults who had achieved HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL following the initiation of fosamprenavir (FPV)/ritonavir (RTV) 1400 mg/100 mg once-daily (QD)-containing regimens between January 2004 and January 2006. Data were available for 20 antiretroviral (ARV)-naïve patients (baseline median HIV-1 RNA 5.0 log(10) copies/mL; CD4+ cell count 307 cells/mm(3)), 30 protease inhibitor (PI)-naïve, ARV-experienced patients (HIV-1 RNA 3.6 log(10) copies/mL; CD4+ count 348 cells/mm(3)) and 25 PI-experienced patients switching to FPV/RTV100 for reasons other than virological failure (HIV-1 RNA 2.7 log(10) copies/mL; CD4+ count 328 cells/mm(3)). HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL was achieved in 100% of the ARV-naïve cohort (median monitoring period, 2.4 years; range, 1.4-3.2 years), 87% of the PI-naïve cohort (2.4 years; range, 1.2-3.4 years) and 88% of the PI-experienced cohort (2.2 years; range, 1.0-3.2 years). Virological failure occurred in 0%, 7% and 8% of the cohorts, respectively, and median CD4+ count increased above baseline by 224, 155 and 115 cells/mm(3), respectively. Change from baseline in median fasting lipids was: total cholesterol +12, -6, -2 mg/dL; low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol 0, -5, +12 mg/dL; high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol +4, +2, +7 mg/dL; triglycerides +9, -21, -65 mg/dL, respectively. In conclusion, FPV/RTV 1400/100 mg QD-containing regimens remained effective long-term in all ARV-naïve and most PI-naïve and PI-experienced HIV-infected patients.

A randomized, double-blind, prospective pilot study of botulinum toxin injection for refractory, unilateral, cervicothoracic, paraspinal, myofascial pain syndrome.

STUDY DESIGN: In a randomized, double-blind study, two dosage strengths of botulinum toxin type A were compared with normal saline injected into symptomatic trigger points in the cervicothoracic paraspinal muscles. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of botulinum toxin type A injections with that of normal saline to determine the former's usefulness in the management of neck pain and disability. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The results of several studies have suggested that botulinum toxin type A may reduce pain associated with myofascial pain syndromes. METHODS: Thirty-three participants were divided randomly to receive either 50 or 100 units of botulinum toxin type A, or normal saline. Patients were re-evaluated over a 4-month period by assessment of their pain and disability and pressure algometer readings, and then offered a second injection of 100 units of botulinum toxin type A. RESULTS: All three groups showed significant treatment effects as measured by a decline in the scores on the Neck Pain and Disability Visual Analogue Scale and an increase in the pressure algometer scores. Group differences were apparent only when the authors considered the number of patients who were asymptomatic as a result of the injections. CONCLUSIONS: Although no statistically significant benefit of botulinum toxin type A over placebo was demonstrated in this study, the high incidence of patients who were asymptomatic after a second injection suggests that further research is needed to determine whether higher dosages and sequential injections in a larger cohort might show a botulinum toxin type A effect.