Acute Thrombotic Occlusion of the Popliteal Artery following Knee Dislocation: A Case Report of Management, Local Unit Practice, and a Review of the Literature.

Arterial complications following traumatic knee injury are relatively rare but mandate timely recognition and treatment to avoid significant comorbidity and medicolegal ramifications. In this report we describe a case of acute thrombotic occlusion of the popliteal artery occurring after knee dislocation, successfully repaired by intimal fixation and a limited venous patch reconstruction. We present a review of local practice in screening vascular injuries following knee dislocation, aligned with a review of the literature and considerations for practice.

Does bicarbonate prevent contrast-induced nephropathy in cardiovascular patients undergoing contrast imaging?

A best evidence topic in cardiovascular surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether administering sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) prevents contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in cardiovascular patients undergoing contrast imaging. In total, 266 papers were found using the reported search, 16 of which represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. CIN is thought to occur as a result of ischaemic or oxidative injury to the kidney. It is postulated that NaHCO3attenuates this renal damage by alkanizing renal tubular fluid thus reducing the generation of contrast-induced free radicals, which damage the kidney. Of the 16 trials, 15 recruited patients with various degrees of renal dysfunction at baseline. The benefit of using NaHCO3 was demonstrated at all stages of chronic kidney disease. Apart from four studies, 12 studies used low toxicity, low-osmolar contrast. Merten et al. published the first trial of NaHCO3 vs (saline) NaCl in preventing CIN, demonstrated a significantly lower rate in the NaHCO3 group and advocated its widespread use. Subsequent trials using the same regimen have collaborated these results. However, more recently, Gomes et al. concluded that NaHCO3 is not superior to saline-based hydration. Similarly, Brar et al. randomized 323 patients with moderate-to-severe renal insufficiency to receive either an NaHCO3 or an NaCl infusion and observed no difference in CIN rates. Two studies investigated the effects of rapid urine alkanization with bolus injections of NaHCO3 prior to contrast and found significant reductions in CIN rates compared with NaCl-treated groups. One study observed that NaCl is superior to NaHCO3, while all other studies showed a beneficial effect or no difference between NaCl- and NaHCO3-based hydration. The most recent meta-analysis by Jang et al. incorporated 3609 patients across 19 trials and concluded that NaHCO3-based hydration regimens are superior to NaCl-based ones. Based on this review, the authors recommend NaHCO3 alongside an NaCl hydration regimen. The exact regimen will depend on the context within which contrast is being administered and needs further evaluation.

Surgical hospital audit of record keeping (SHARK)--a new audit tool for the improvement in surgical record keeping.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate and legible record keeping is a crucial part of good medical practice. Surgical Hospital Audit of Record Keeping (SHARK) is a new audit and teaching tool for junior doctors. The author has designed the tool, based on the Royal College of Surgeons guidelines, to anonymously score the different surgical teams' medical records within a hospital. It takes into account regular record keeping during ward rounds, together with the operation note and admission clerking. METHODS: The SHARK audit tool assesses 45 individual areas within surgical records. Fifteen points are apportioned for an initial surgical clerking, 13 for a subsequent record entry, and 17 for the operation note to give an overall score out of 45. It was implemented at 2 hospitals and used to educate medical students. RESULTS: The results were poor and improved with education at both sites. There was 80% total agreement with a κ coefficient for interobserver reliability of 0.6. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the SHARK tool is simple to use, repeatable, and reliable in improving record keeping.

Quality of vascular surgery Web sites on the Internet.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the readability, accessibility, usability, and reliability of vascular surgery information on the Internet in the English language. METHODS: The Google, Yahoo, and MSN/Bing search engines were searched for "carotid endarterectomy," "EVAR or endovascular aneurysm repair," and "varicose veins or varicose veins surgery." The first 50 Web sites from each search engine for each topic were analyzed. The Flesch Reading Ease Score and Gunning Fog Index were calculated to assess readability. The LIDA tool (Minervation Ltd, Oxford, UK) was used to assess accessibility, usability, and reliability. RESULTS: The Web sites were difficult to read and comprehend. The mean Flesch Reading Ease scores were 53.53 for carotid endarterectomy, 50.53 for endovascular aneurysm repair, and 58.59 for varicose veins. The mean Gunning Fog Index scores were 12.3 for carotid endarterectomy, 12.12 for endovascular aneurysm repair, and 10.69 for varicose veins. The LIDA values for accessibility were good, but the results for usability and reliability were poor. CONCLUSIONS: Internet information on vascular surgical conditions and procedures is poorly written and unreliable. We suggest that health professionals should recommend Web sites that are easy to read and contain high-quality surgical information. Medical information on the Internet must be readable, accessible, usable, and reliable.