Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ochsner J ; 21(1): 14-18, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33828421

RESUMO

Background: Studies of adult and pediatric patients undergoing appendectomy have reported variable outcomes and operative metrics related to the effect of obesity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of obesity in adult and pediatric patients undergoing appendectomy at our institution. Methods: This single-center retrospective study evaluated the relationship between length of hospital stay for appendectomy and body mass index (BMI). Data obtained from the electronic medical record included age, sex, weight, height, BMI, the number of hours the patient experienced symptoms prior to presentation to the emergency room, the number of hours the patient was admitted prior to surgery, the number of hours of hospital admission after surgery, perforated appendix, preoperative comorbidities, and evidence of preoperative sepsis. Results: During the 3-year study period, 118 adults and 38 children who underwent appendectomy composed the study groups. Patients were stratified by obese and nonobese, with obesity defined as BMI ≥30.0 kg/m2. In adults, we found no significant difference between length of stay in obese (n=45) and nonobese (n=73) patients (79.6 ± 65.5 hours vs 101.6 ± 123.0 hours; P=0.21). In children, we found no significant difference between length of stay in obese (n=9) and nonobese (n=29) patients (92.9 ± 64.6 hours vs 109.0 ± 93.5 hours; P=0.54). Conclusion: Obesity did not affect length of stay in adults and children who underwent appendectomy in the present series.

2.
Am Surg ; 84(4): 576-580, 2018 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29712609

RESUMO

Surgical site infections with elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy are less frequent and less severe, leading some to suggest that prophylactic antibiotics (PA) are no longer indicated. We compared the incidence of surgical site infections before and after an institutional practice change of withholding PA for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Between May 7, 2013, and March 11, 2015, no PA were given to patients selected for elective cholecystectomy by two surgeons at a single center. The only patients excluded were those who received antibiotics before surgery for any reason. All others, including those at high risk for infection, were included. The incidence and severity of infections were compared with historical controls treated with prophylaxis by the same two surgeons from November 6, 2011, to January 13, 2013. There were 268 patients in the study group and 119 patients in the control group. Infection occurred in 3.0 per cent in the study group compared with 0.9 per cent in the controls (P = 0.29). All infections were mild except one. Based on these data, the routine use of PA for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not supported.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...