RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The plasmakinetic cautery is a surgical dissection instrument that combines scalpel-like cutting precision with electrocautery-like haemostasis properties, and operates at lower temperatures (40-170 °C) than conventional electrocautery (200-350 °C). The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical benefits of using plasmakinetic cautery in abdominal free flap dissection for breast reconstruction. METHODS: Forty women undergoing abdominal-based microsurgical breast reconstruction (DIEP/MS-TRAM) were randomized to plasmakinetic cautery (n=20) or conventional electrocautery (n=20) for dissection of the abdominal free flap. Total abdominal wound drainage volume/duration, operation time and complications such as seroma and haematoma were examined. RESULTS: Age, body mass index, type of reconstruction and abdominal flap weight were similar in both groups. Mean abdominal drainage volume was (279±262) mL in conventional electrocautery group and (294±265) mL in plasmakinetic cautery group (P=0.853). Plasmakinetic cautery group mean drainage duration (4.3±2.2 days) was no difference compared to conventional diathermy group (3.8±2.0 days, P=0.501). Mean operation time in the conventional electrocautery group and plasmakinetic cautery group was 157±50 vs. 174±70 min respectively (P=0.195). There was more seroma detected in the conventional electrocautery group compared to plasmakinetic cautery group at days 7, 14 and 42 post-operation, but this was not statically significant. 2 haematomas in conventional diathermy group and 1 haematoms in the plasmakinetic cautery group required evacuation. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that there are no significant differences between the use of plasmakinetic cautery and conventional electrocautery for abdominal free flap dissection.
RESUMO
Malignant eccrine spiradenoma (MES) is an extremely rare but aggressive tumour, resulting in high mortality. We report the first case in the UK of metastatic MES on the scalp of a 37-year-old man who initially presented with a raised nodular mass which had grown rapidly over a few months. Excision biopsy of the lesion was performed and histology confirmed MES with evidence of cytological atypia and necrosis. A further wide local excision of the lesion with a 1â cm surgical margin was performed and full clearance was achieved. At 10-month follow-up another similar lesion had developed close to the previously excised area. A CT scan demonstrated metastatic lesions in the lungs, liver and pelvis, and subsequently chemotherapy was initiated. Although MES is uncommon, it has a high propensity to metastasise, therefore prompt identification, treatment and close follow-up of these tumours is essential.
