Pros and cons of antithrombotic therapy in end-stage kidney disease: a 2019 update.

Dialysis patients manifest both an increased thrombotic risk and a haemorrhagic tendency. A great number of patients with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis have cardiovascular comorbidities (coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism) and different indications for treatment with antithrombotics (primary or secondary prevention). Unfortunately, few randomized controlled trials deal with antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy in dialysis. Therefore cardiology and nephrology guidelines offer ambiguous recommendations and often exclude or ignore these patients. In our opinion, there is a need for an expert consensus that provides physicians with useful information to make correct decisions in different situations requiring antithrombotics. Herein the European Dialysis Working Group presents up-to-date evidence about the topic and encourages practitioners to choose among alternatives in order to limit bleeding and minimize atherothrombotic and cardioembolic risks. In the absence of clear evidence, these clinical settings and consequent therapeutic strategies will be discussed by highlighting data from observational studies for and against the use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs alone or in combination. Until new studies shed light on unclear clinical situations, one should keep in mind that the objective of treatment is to minimize thrombotic risk while reducing bleeding events.

Incidence of endometrial carcinoma in patients with endometrial hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to establish the risk of developing endometrial adenocarcinoma in patients diagnosed with endometrial hyperplasia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The incidence of endometrial hyperplasia and its relation with endometrial adenocarcinoma was evaluated in 1,139 patients who presented with abnormal bleeding between January 2000 and December 2004; D&C was performed in all cases. There were 591 (51.88%) cases of simple endometrial hyperplasia, out of which 110 (18.61% from 51.88%) cases had atypia, 60 (5.26%) cases of complex hyperplasia, out of which 19 (31.66% from 5.26%) had atypia, and the remaining 488 (42.84%) had different forms of mixed hyperplasia. RESULTS: The incidence of endometrial adenocarcinoma was 3.87% in atypical hyperplasia and 0.81% in other forms, and was related only to cases with atypia in which the incidence was 0.61%. CONCLUSIONS: The most indicated measure to prevent endometrial carcinoma in cases with complex endometria hyperplasia with atypia is hysterectomy, while for other forms of hyperplasia, hormonal treatment is used but only under strict control.

[Hysterectomy of "necessity"--current evaluation]. / Histerectomia de "necesitate"--evaluare actuala.

Hysterectomy after caesarian section is a radical surgery intervention. The obstetricians take the decision as a last surgical attitude in major obstetrical emergency. We tried in this study to analyze the causes of post-caesarian section, because this surgical intervention is a mutilant one. In many cases this surgical intervention had been effectuated for abundant hemorrhage, uterine hypotonia, utero-placentar apoplexy. In some cases the intervention was indicated from the beginning of intervention. The clinic evolution after hysterectomy was a good one without major complications.