DASH vs. Mediterranean diet on a salt restriction background in adults with high normal blood pressure or grade 1 hypertension: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Non-pharmacological measures are recommended as the first-line treatment for individuals with high-normal blood pressure (BP) or mild hypertension. Studies directly comparing the BP effects of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) vs. the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) on a salt restriction background are currently lacking. Thus, our purpose was to assess the BP effects of a 3-month intensive dietary intervention implementing salt restriction either alone or in the context of the DASH, and the MedDiet compared to no/minimal intervention in adults with high normal BP or grade 1 hypertension. METHODS: We randomly assigned never drug-treated individuals to a control group (CG, n = 60), a salt restriction group (SRG, n = 60), a DASH diet with salt restriction group (DDG, n = 60), or a MedDiet with salt restriction group (MDG, n = 60). The primary outcome was the attained office systolic BP difference among the randomized arms during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 240 patients were enrolled, while 204 (85%) completed the study. According to the intention-to-treat analysis, compared to the CG, office and 24 h ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP were reduced in all intervention groups. A greater reduction in the mean office systolic BP was observed in the MDG compared to all other study groups (MDG vs. CG: mean difference = -15.1 mmHg; MDG vs. SRG: mean difference = -7.5 mmHg, and MDG vs. DDG: mean difference = -3.2 mmHg, all P-values <0.001). The DDG and the MDG did not differ concerning the office diastolic BP and the 24 h ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP; however, both diets were more efficient in BP-lowering compared to the SRG. CONCLUSIONS: On a background of salt restriction, the MedDiet was superior in office systolic BP-lowering, but the DASH and MedDiet reduced BP to an extent higher than salt restriction alone.

Lipoprotein(a), metabolic profile and new-onset type 2 diabetes in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia: A 9 year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] appears to have an inverse association with the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the general population. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic role of Lp(a) regarding the development of type 2 diabetes in the special population of subjects with familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCH). METHODS: This cohort study included 474 patients (mean age 49.7±11.3 years, 64% males) with FCH, without diabetes at baseline who were followed for a mean period of 8.2±6.8 years. At baseline evaluation venous blood samples were obtained for the determination of lipid profile and Lp(a) levels. The endpoint of interest was the development of diabetes. RESULTS: Patients with increased Lp(a) levels ≥30 mg/dl compared to those with low Lp(a) levels <30 mg/dl had lower levels of triglycerides (238±113 vs 268±129 mg/dl, p = 0.01), greater levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (44±10 vs 41±10 mg/dl, p = 0.01) and hypertension in a greater percentage (42% vs 32%, p = 0.03). The incidence of new-onset diabetes during the follow-up period was 10.1% (n = 48). Multiple Cox regression analysis revealed that increased Lp(a) is an independent predictor of lower diabetes incidence (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.90, p = 0.02) after adjustment for confounders. CONCLUSION: Among subjects with FCH those with higher Lp(a) levels have lower risk for the development of type 2 diabetes. Moreover, the presence of increased Lp(a) seems to differentiate the expression of metabolic syndrome characteristics in patients with FCH, as increased Lp(a) is related to lower levels of triglycerides, greater prevalence of hypertension and higher levels of HDL cholesterol.