Cardiopulmonary evaluation of the use of medetomidine hydrochloride in cats.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cardiovascular effects of the alpha2-adrenergic receptor agonist medetomidine hydrochloride in clinically normal cats. ANIMALS: 7 clinically normal cats. PROCEDURE: Cats were anesthetized with isoflurane, and thermodilution catheters were placed for measurement of central venous, pulmonary, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures and for determination of cardiac output. The dorsal pedal artery was catheterized for measurement of arterial blood pressures and blood gas tensions. Baseline variables were recorded, and medetomidine (20 microg/kg of body weight, IM) was administered. Hemodynamic measurements were repeated 15 and 30 minutes after medetomidine administration. RESULTS: Heart rate, cardiac index, stroke index, rate-pressure product, and right and left ventricular stroke work index significantly decreased from baseline after medetomidine administration, whereas systemic vascular resistance and central venous pressure increased. However, systolic, mean, and diastolic arterial pressures as well as arterial pH, and oxygen and carbon dioxide tensions were not significantly different from baseline values. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When administered alone to clinically normal cats, medetomidine (20 microg/kg, IM) induced a significant decrease in cardiac output, stroke volume, and heart rate. Arterial blood pressures did not increase, which may reflect a predominant central alpha2-adrenergic effect over peripheral vascular effects.

The effect of a combination of medetomidine-butorphanol and medetomidine, butorphanol, atropine on glomerular filtration rate in dogs.

The effects of intramuscularly administered medetomidine and butorphanol (MB), and medetomidine, butorphanol, atropine (MBA) on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were determined in six dogs as measured by 99m-Tc-labeled diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) nuclear scintigraphy. Direct systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressures and heart rate were measured at regular time intervals before, during, and after GFR calculations. The mean GFR measurement following MB was significantly greater (4.44 ml/min/kg) than following MBA (3.82 ml/min/kg) or saline treatment (3.41 ml/min/kg). There was no significant difference between the mean GFR measurements following MBA injection and following saline injection. Diastolic and mean arterial pressures following MBA injection were significantly higher than the values recorded after either MB or saline alone. Heart rate following MB administration was significantly lower than that recorded for dogs receiving MBA or saline alone. The results of this study indicate that the administration of medetomidine in combination with butorphanol significantly increases total GFR in healthy dogs, while the administration of the combination of medetomidine, butorphanol, and atropine does not.

Anesthetic and cardiopulmonary effects of propofol in dogs premedicated with atropine, butorphanol, and medetomidine.

This study evaluated the anesthetic and cardiorespiratory effects of a combination of intravenous propofol (2.2 mg/kg), intramuscular medetomidine (22.0 pg/kg), intravenous butorphanol (0.22 mg/kg), and intravenous atropine (0.022 mg/kg) in healthy dogs. Anesthesia was characterized by muscle relaxation and analgesia. Heart rate decreased after medetomidine and propofol administration (131 to 113 beats/min) but returned to baseline after intravenous atipamezole (110 microg/kg). Mild acidemia, hypercapnia, hypoxemia, and decreased SaO2 developed after premedication. PaO2 and SaO2 were further decreased by propofol injection. In conclusion, this combination proved to be an effective anesthetic protocol for healthy dogs and should be adequate for minor surgical procedures.

Physiology of pain.

The substantial increase in our collective knowledge of pain physiology and pharmacology over the past decade has had a significant effect on the practice of clinical veterinary medicine. An overview of the basic anatomical and physiologic components of nociceptive processing is presented, as well as a discussion of the sensitizing events that occur within the nervous system in acute and chronic pathologic pain states. The unique features of visceral and neuropathic pain are also outlined. With the goal of improving the success of our therapeutic interventions, the final section is devoted to the various classes of analgesic drugs and techniques, and how they are best incorporated into pain management strategies.

Duration of nonresponse to noxious stimulation after intramuscular administration of butorphanol, medetomidine, or a butorphanol-medetomidine combination during isoflurane administration in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To assess duration of actions of butorphanol, medetomidine, and a butorphanol-medetomidine combination in dogs given subanesthetic doses of isoflurane (ISO). ANIMALS: 6 healthy dogs. PROCEDURE: Minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) values for ISO were determined. for each dog. Subsequently, 4 treatments were administered to each dog (saline [0.9% NaCl] solution, butorphanol [0.2 mg/kg of body weight], medetomidine [5.0 microg/kg], and a combination of butorphanol [0.2 mg/kg] and medetomidine [5.0 microg/kg]). All treatments were administered IM to dogs concurrent with isoflurane; treatment order was determined, using a randomized crossover design. Treatments were given at 7-day intervals. After mask induction with ISO and instrumentation with a rectal temperature probe, end-tidal CO2 and anesthetic gas concentrations were analyzed. End-tidal ISO concentration was reduced to 90% MAC for each dog. A tail clamp was applied 15 minutes later. After a positive response, 1 of the treatments was administered. Response to application of the tail clamp was assessed at 15-minute intervals until a positive response again was detected. RESULTS: Duration of nonresponse after administration of saline solution, butorphanol, medetomidine, and butorphanol-medetomidine (mean +/- SD) was 0.0+/-0.0, 1.5+/-1.5, 2.63+/-0.49, and 5.58+/-2.28 hours, respectively. Medetomidine effects were evident significantly longer than those for saline solution, whereas effects for butorphanol-medetomidine were evident significantly longer than for each agent administered alone. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: During ISO-induced anesthesia, administration of medetomidine, but not butorphanol, provides longer and more consistent analgesia than does saline solution, and the combination of butorphanol-medetomidine appears superior to the use of medetomidine or butorphanol alone.

Preferences for participation in treatment decision making and information needs of parents of children with cancer: a pilot study.

This study was performed to obtain information on parents of children with cancer: (a) what role parents preferred to assume in treatment decision making (TDM); (b) parents' priority information needs; (c) if a relationship existed between TDM preferences and information needs; and (d) if sociodemographic, disease and treatment variables predicted TDM preferences or information needs. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with a convenience sample of 58 parents who had a child less than 13 years of age diagnosed with cancer in the previous year. Instruments included a Sociodemographic, Disease, and Treatment Questionnaire; the Control Preferences Scale for Pediatrics, and an Information Needs Questionnaire. The results showed that parents had systematic preferences about TDM, preferring collaborative followed by passive and active roles. Nine priorities in information needs (highest to lowest) were found: (a) treatments and tests, (b) cure, (c) caring for my child, (d) emotional impact, (e) side effects, (f) physical impact, (g) disease, (h) coping with painful procedures, and (i) impact on the family. Sociodemographic, disease and treatment variables were not predictive of preferences for TDM or information needs. Concrete informational needs take precedence over issues of emotional or family impact or pain. A low Kendall's coefficient (0.07) indicated that parents as a group do not have uniform information needs. Information giving must be individualized.

The pharmacodynamics of thiopental, medetomidine, butorphanol and atropine in beagle dogs.

This study evaluated the quality of anaesthesia and some of the haemodynamic effects induced by a combination of thiopental, medetomidine, butorphanol and atropine in healthy beagle dogs (n = 12). Following premedication with atropine (ATR, 0.022 mg/kg intravenously (i.v.)) and butorphanol (BUT, 0.22 mg/kg i.v.), medetomidine (MED, 22 micrograms/kg intramuscularly (i.m.)) was administered followed in 5 min by thiopental (THIO, 2.2 mg/kg i.v.). Heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial blood pressure (MBP) were monitored continuously with an ECG and direct arterial blood pressure monitor. Atipamezole (ATI, 110 micrograms/kg i.v.) was administered to half of the dogs (n = 6) following surgery to evaluate the speed and quality of arousal from anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was characterized by excellent muscle relaxation, analgesia and absence of purposeful movement in response to surgical castration. Arousal following antagonism of medetomidine was significantly faster (P < 0.05) than in unantagonized dogs. Recoveries were smooth but recovery times following atipamezole administration were highly variable among dogs (sternal time range 6-38 min, standing time range 9-56 min). Medetomidine caused a significant (P < 0.05) increase in SBP, DBP and MBP. Atropine prevented the medetomidine induced bradycardia. In conclusion, this combination provided adequate surgical anaesthesia in healthy beagle dogs. At the dosages used in this study, it seems prudent that this combination should be reserved for dogs free of myocardial disease.

Pharmacology of drugs used for anesthesia and sedation.

This article reviews and defines the concepts underlying modern pharmacologic science, such as the study of pharmacokinetics, pharmodynamics, and drug interactions. Differences in anesthetic and sedative effects observed among species may be explained in part, by varying pharmacokinetics and dynamics unique to each species. Pharmacokinetic data from ruminants and swine for many of the commonly used anesthetics and adjunctive sedatives are included. The receptor mechanism mediating the actions of anesthetics and sedatives is also reviewed. Rationale for combining CNS depressant drugs and analgesics to achieve "balanced anesthesia" and other favorable drug interactions is discussed. Several drug combinations used in ruminants and swine are provided in table form.