Phase II study of biweekly pemetrexed and gemcitabine in patients with previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Pemetrexed and gemcitabine are safe and active non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) therapies when administered every 3 weeks. Biweekly scheduling was studied in this phase II trial. METHODS: The primary objective was to assess the overall response rate in chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable stage III/IV NSCLC. Patients received 500 mg/m(2) of pemetrexed intravenously and 1500 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine intravenously every 2 weeks for 8 to 12 cycles with restaging every 4 cycles. Patients also received supplemental folate/B12 therapy. Entry criteria included the following: all non-small cell histologies, measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 to 2, and informed consent. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics included the following: median age: 66 years (41-85 years); male/female: 65%/35%; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0/1/2: 19%/67%/14%; and histology: adenocarcinoma (36%), large cell (18%), squamous (13%), and mixed or not specified (34%). The median number of cycles was 7 (range, 1-12). The most common (> or =5%) grade 3/4 toxicities were as follows: neutropenia (47%), leukopenia (31%), fatigue (25%), dyspnea (18%), pain (11%), and anemia (8%). Complete/partial responses for all patients: 1 patient/18 patients, respectively, for an overall response rate of 26% (95% confidence interval, 17-38%). Thirty-nine percentage of patients had stable disease, and 21% had disease progression (10 patients were not evaluable). Median progression-free survival was 6.2 months. One-year overall survival was 37.5%. CONCLUSION: Biweekly administration of pemetrexed and gemcitabine seems to be well tolerated with activity comparable with other first-line NSCLC regimens. Further study addressing whether biweekly scheduling could be an effective strategy to shorten overall treatment duration will require a randomized design.

Brief-duration rituximab/chemotherapy followed by maintenance rituximab in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who are poor candidates for R-CHOP chemotherapy: a phase II trial of the Sarah Cannon Oncology Research Consortium.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who are very elderly or have poor performance status are difficult to treat with a full course of R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/ prednisone) therapy. In this phase II trial, we treated this group of patients with a novel regimen containing 3 courses of rituximab/chemotherapy followed by maintenance rituximab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed stage II-IV DLBCL were eligible if they were considered poor candidates for 6-8 cycles of R-CHOP therapy. Patients who were eligible for anthracycline therapy received 3 cycles of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide/ mitoxantrone/vincristine/prednisone (CNOP); the remainder of patients received R-CVP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide/ vincristine/prednisone). Patients without progression after completion of 3 cycles received 4 courses of maintenance rituximab (375 mg/m2 weekly x 4, repeated every 6 months) for 24 months. RESULTS: Between May 2003 and July 2007, 51 patients were enrolled. The median age was 78 years, and 43% of patients were > 80 years of age. Nineteen patients (37%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2, and 72% had high-intermediate or high-risk International Prognostic Index scores. After a median follow-up of 48 months, the 2-, 3-, and 4-year progression-free survival rates are 71%, 65%, and 56%, respectively. The 2-, 3-, and 4-year overall survival rates are 72%, 67%, and 67%, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated, with few severe toxicities and no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: This abbreviated course of rituximab/chemotherapy, followed by maintenance rituximab, was active and well tolerated in these very elderly patients. Brief-duration rituximab/chemotherapy as well as maintenance rituximab merit further evaluation in this setting.