Adverse Events Induced by PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors: A Real-World Single-Centre Experience with a Management-Based Approach.

AIM: To assess the efficacy and tolerance of programmed death-1 (PD-1) and PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors and the impact of a standardised management-based protocol in a real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from patients who had received anti-PD-(L)1 were collected from our pharmacy database. Clinical response and toxicity were assessed using RECIST criteria and CTCAE version 5.0, respectively. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Potential prognostic factors were identified using Cox's model. RESULTS: A total of 196 patients and 201 lines of treatment were included (median age: 66 (range: 38-89) years). Types of cancer included non-small cell lung cancer (73%), transitional cell carcinoma (10%), renal cell carcinoma (6%), small cell lung cancer (5%), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (4%) and classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (1%). Twenty-five (12%) patients had pre-existing autoimmune conditions. Our standardised management-based protocol included 129 (64%) patients. Objective response rate was 29%, median OS was 10 months (IQR: 7-15) and median PFS was 5 months (IQR: 1-22). Patients with an abnormal baseline complete blood count had a worse OS (HR=2.48 [95% CI: 1.24-4.96]; p=0.0103). Thirty-three (16%) patients experienced severe (grade 3 or 4) immune-related adverse event (irAE). There were three (1%) irAE-related deaths. AEs resolved faster when patients were assessed by an internist before anti-PD-(L)1 initiation (p=0.0205). CONCLUSION: PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors are effective and safe in a real-world setting. Implementation of a standardised management-based protocol with internal medicine specialists is an effective way to optimise irAE management.

Seminal vesicle invasion: what is the best adjuvant treatment after radical prostatectomy?

OBJECTIVE: • To evaluate the biochemical-failure free survival according to different adjuvant treatments in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) with seminal vesicle invasion (SVI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: • Between 1994 and 2008, 4090 men underwent RP in nine centres. Of these, 310 men had a SVI. • Exclusion criteria were: detectable postoperative prostate-specific antigen, lymph node metastases and follow-up <18 months. • Therefore, the study group included 199 patients. Of these, 41 received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) only, 26 received adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) only, 50 received adjuvant ADT combined with RT and 82 were monitored. The endpoint for this analysis was biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED). • Preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, specimen Gleason score, age, clinical stage, surgical margin status and adjuvant treatment were evaluated in a multivariable analysis with respect to bNED survival. RESULTS: • After a mean (range) follow-up of 60.3 (18-185) months, 88 (44.2%) patients had a biochemical relapse. • The estimated 5- and 7-year bNED survival were 32.6% and 25.9% for the observation group, 44.4% and 28.6% for the RT only group, 48.4% and 32.3% for the ADT only group and 82.8% and 62.1% for the adjuvant ADT combined with RT group. • On multivariate analysis, only adjuvant ADT combined with RT (P < 0.001) was an independent prognostic factor of biochemical relapse. CONCLUSIONS: • RP appeared to be insufficient as a single treatment for patients with SVI. • The findings of the present study suggest that adjuvant ADT combined with RT after RP for patients with SVI confers a substantial benefit on 5-year bNED survival.

Attempted isolation of Nanobacterium sp. microorganisms from upper urinary tract stones.

A single team has reported isolation of nanobacteria in human and bovine blood products, as well as, more recently, kidney stones. This has raised controversy. To confirm the data, we searched for nanobacteria from 10 aseptically removed upper urinary tract (UUT) stones. We used scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) with four stones and culture of stones on either 3T6 fibroblast monolayers or liquid RPMI medium. Detection of nanobacteria was made with a commercially available monoclonal antibody, 16S ribosomal DNA amplification with specific primers, and transmission electronic microscopy (TEM) of inoculated cells. SEM showed nanoparticles in four of four UUT stones similar to those recently described. TEM of inoculated 3T6 cell monolayers has shown transient intracytoplasmic vacuolar formations containing 200- to 500-nm particles in 3 of 10 cell cultures. Gimenez staining, Hoechst staining, and specific monoclonal immunofluorescence failed to reveal nanobacteria. Finally, we could not grow Nanobacterium sp. microorganisms by the techniques described. Although with SEM, we observed nanoparticles morphologically similar to nanobacteria, we failed to isolate Nanobacterium sp. microorganisms in culture and to prove the bacterial nature of these nanoparticles in stones.