Translating addictions research into evidence-based practice: the Polaris CD outcomes management system.

Converting the findings from addictions studies into information actionable by (non-research) treatment programs is important to improving program outcomes. This paper describes the translation of the findings of studies on Patient-Services matching, prediction of patient response to treatment (Expected Treatment Response) and prediction of dropout to provide evidence-based decision support in routine treatment. The findings of the studies and their application to the development of an outcomes management system are described. Implementation issues in a network of addictions treatment programs are discussed. The work illustrates how outcomes management systems can play an important role in translating research into practice.

Assessing treatment progress of individual patients using expected treatment response models.

The dosage model provides a normative estimate of the overall pattern of patient improvement in psychotherapy. The phase model further specifies patterns of change in the domains of subjective well-being, symptom remediation, and functioning. The expected treatment response (ETR) approach uses patient characteristics to predict an expected path of progress for each patient. With repeated measures of mental health status, the treatment progress of an individual patient can be assessed against the patient's ETR to support decisions that would enhance the quality of a clinical service while it is being delivered.

Problem-service 'matching' in addiction treatment. A prospective study in 4 programs.

BACKGROUND: Our initial attempts to "match" substance-abuse patients from an employee assistance program to an optimal setting or program failed. Scientifically, we found no differential predictors of better outcomes by setting or program. From a practical perspective, it was impossible to place patients in the intended programs. This led to a second study, designed to identify specific patient problems and match professional services to those problems within each of the 4 programs. METHODS: Ninety-four new patients admitted to 4 substance-abuse treatment programs were randomly assigned to standard treatment and treated in the usual manner or were assigned to "matched" services, in which patients received at least 3 professional sessions directed at their important employment, family, or psychiatric problems. RESULTS: Matched patients stayed in treatment longer, were more likely to complete treatment, and had better posttreatment outcomes than did the standard patients treated in the same programs. CONCLUSIONS: For logistical, financial, and clinical reasons, it is improbable that patients will be matched to specific types of programs. However, within any program, it is possible and practical to match appropriate services to patients' specific treatment problems. This strategy was clinically and administratively practical, attractive to patients, and responsible for a 20% to 30% increase in the effectiveness of this substance-abuse treatment system.

Coerced treatment for substance abuse problems detected through workplace urine surveillance: is it effective?

With the advent of on-site urine testing and other initiatives designed to reduce substance abuse at the workplace, employees who are found to have used alcohol and/or drugs have been coerced into substance abuse treatments under threat of job loss. This widespread practice has produced three questions relative to these practices. First, do these employees have significant substance abuse problems or are they merely "recreational users" who have gotten caught? Second, will these employees participate in standard treatments or will they resist them? Finally, will standard substance abuse treatments provide any benefits to these coerced patients relative to other self-referred patients in treatment? We compared the pretreatment problems, during treatment performance and posttreatment outcomes of 96 employed, insured participants who were coerced into treatment at four private treatment programs due to detection of drug use on the job, to the same measures collected on a comparison group of 161 patients from the same job sites who were self-referred admissions to the same four treatment programs. Results showed that the coerced group had significant substance abuse and other life problems at the start of treatment, but that these problems were generally less severe or chronic than those of the self-referred group. Coerced participants were significantly more likely to remain in treatment (either inpatient or outpatient) than the self-referred participants. Posttreatment follow-up of coerced patients indicated marked improvements in alcohol and drug use, employment, medical, family, and psychiatric problems. These levels of improvement were comparable to those shown by the self-referred patients. We conclude that workplace urine surveillance was successful in detecting employees with significant substance abuse related problems, and that referral to standard treatment was associated with substantial improvements in those problems.

Similarity of outcome predictors across opiate, cocaine, and alcohol treatments: role of treatment services.

This study examined the patient and treatment factors associated with 6-month outcome in 649 opiate-, alcohol-, and cocaine-dependent (male and female) adults, treated in inpatient and outpatient settings, in 22 publicly and privately funded programs. Outcomes were predicted by similar factors, regardless of the drug problem of the patient or the type of treatment setting or funding. Greater substance use at follow-up was predicted only by greater severity of alcohol and drug use at treatment admission, not by the number of services received during treatment. Better social adjustment at follow-up was negatively predicted by more severe psychiatric, employment, and family problems at admission and positively predicted by more psychiatric, family, employment, and medical services provided during treatment.

Private substance abuse treatments: are some programs more effective than others?

There have been few studies of treatments for substance dependence among private programs. The present study compared the patient populations, treatment services provided and six-month outcomes of employed, insured patients referred by an employee assistance program to four private treatment programs (two inpatient and two outpatient). Subjects were alcohol and/or cocaine dependent males referred from a single employer. Ninety-four percent were successfully contacted at six-month follow-up, with confirmatory urinalysis and breathalyzer samples taken. Three results were obtained. First, there were significant and pervasive improvements shown in the total sample at follow-up. Fifty-nine percent were completely abstinent, 82% were working and only 8% required re-treatment. Second, there were significant differences among the programs in levels of improvement and six-month outcomes. Finally, the differences in efficacy were related to the differences in the nature and amount of treatment services provided.

The Fifth Edition of the Addiction Severity Index.

The Addiction Severity Index (ASI) is 12 years old and has been revised to include a new section on family history of alcohol, drug, and psychiatric problems. New items were added in existing sections to assess route of drug administration; additional illegal activities; emotional, physical, and sexual abuse; quality of the recovery environment; and history of close personal relationships. No changes were made in the composite scoring to maintain comparability with previous editions. This article discusses the clinical and research uses of the ASI over the past 12 years, emphasizing some special circumstances that affect its administration. The article then describes the rationale for and description of the changes made in the ASI. The final section provides "normative data" on the composite scores and severity ratings for samples of opiate, alcohol, and cocaine abusers as well as drug abusing inmates, pregnant women, homeless men, and psychiatrically ill substance abusers.

Addiction Severity Index: experience in the field.

Since its introduction in 1979, the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) has become one of the world's most widely used instruments in substance abuse treatment and research. Its wide acceptance suggests that enhancements of the ASI based upon users' experience would be of considerable value to clinicians and researchers. ASI users are the best source of information regarding the strengths and weaknesses of the instrument, adequacy of the ASI manual, requirements for training ASI interviewers, etc. This paper reports findings from a survey of 25 ASI users in the United States. Topics covered include reasons for selecting the ASI, modifications to the instrument made in response to site-specific requirements, and suggestions regarding enhancements which would promote its appropriate use by well-trained interviewers.