Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring Using Maternal Abdominal Surface Electrodes in Third Trimester: Can We Obtain Additional Information Other than CTG Trace?

BACKGROUND: Cardiotocography (CTG) is the most widely used procedure despite its low specificity for fetal acidosis and poor perinatal outcome. Fetal electrocardiography (fECG) with transabdominal electrodes is a new, non-invasive and promising method with greater potential for detecting impairment of fetal circulation. This study is the first that attempts to assess the usefulness of fECG in comparison to CTG during antepartum period. OBJECTIVES: To determine if a single fECG examination along with CTG tracing and Doppler flow measurement in the fetal vessels has any additional clinical value in normal and intrauterine growth restricted (IUGR) fetuses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 93 pregnancies with IUGR, 37 pregnancies with IUGR and brain sparing effect, and 324 healthy pregnant women. The T/QRS ratio, cerebro-placental ratio (CRP), and CTG tracings were analyzed. One-way analysis of variance and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient were applied. The relationship between results of the T/QRS ratio and CTG examination among the study groups was analyzed. RESULTS: The highest average mean value of the T/QRS ratio was recorded in the IUGR group with a normal CPR and a pathologic CTG (0.235 ± 0.014). The highest average maximum values were observed in the groups of IUGR pregnancies with a reduced CPR with normal (0.309 ± 0.100), suspicious (0.330 ± 0.102) and pathologic (0.319 ± 0.056) CTGs. Analysis of variance revealed differences between study groups regarding maximum values and the difference between maximum and minimal values of T/QRS. Correlations between groups were insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Higher values of T/QRS ratio in IUGR pregnancies with normal and reduced CPR than in control group regardless of the result of CTG examination may indicate minimal worsening of intrauterine fetal well-being in growth retarded fetuses. No relationship between fECG examination and CTG tracings suggests that a single fECG does not provide any additional clinically significant information determining the condition of the fetus; however, further studies are required.

The T/QRS ratio values in pregnancies complicated by threatened preterm labour treated with intravenous infusions of fenoterol.

AIMS: To evaluate values of foetal T/QRS ratios in pregnancies complicated by threatened preterm labour treated with intravenous infusions of fenoterol using non-invasive methods with transabdominal electrodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 451 Caucasian women (63 preterm pregnancies and 327 healthy controls) whose pregnancies ranged from 28 to 37 gestational weeks. Foetal electrocardiograms were recorded and T/QRS ratios were calculated by KOMPOREL software (ITAM, Zabrze, Poland). The first recording was performed 30 min after the start of fenoterol infusion and the second 2 days after finishing tocolysis. T/QRS ratio variables were calculated. One-way analysis of variance was carried out. RESULTS: Significantly higher mean values of the T/QRS ratio were observed in pregnancies during tocolytic treatment in comparison to controls and pregnancies after tocolysis (P=0.0158 and P=0.0071, respectively). The T/QRS ratio values fall again shortly after finishing intravenous tocolysis. CONCLUSIONS: The T/QRS ratio is one of the methods used for non-invasive foetal distress assessment that can be used in antepartum foetal monitoring in complicated pregnancies. Raised values of the T/QRS ratio in the foetus during tocolysis with fenoterol and next its fall to values observed in physiological pregnancies may indicate transient worsening of fetal well-being, however, additional research is required.

Signal loss during fetal heart rate monitoring using maternal abdominal surface electrodes between 28 and 42 weeks of pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Fetal electrocardiography is one of the methods for monitoring the well-being of the fetus. Signal loss limits the proper interpretation of electrocardiogram traces. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the average signal loss in non-invasive abdominal fetal electrocardiogram (fECG) monitoring using the KOMPOREL fetal monitoring system (ITAM, Zabrze, Poland) in women between 28 and 42 week of pregnancy. The results were compared to FIGO (International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetric) and DGGG (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe e.V.) recommendations concerning fetal heart monitoring. The correlation between fetal ECG signal quality, week of pregnancy and patient BMI was evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 773 pregnant women, hospitalized and diagnosed in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Wroclaw Medical University, underwent 30 min of abdominal fECG recordings using the KOMPOREL fetal monitoring system. RESULTS: The average signal loss in abdominal fECG monitoring in the study group was 32%. FIGO recommendations describe an acceptable fetal signal loss of 20%. In our study, 46% (357/773) of the recordings were up to FIGO standards, with fetal heart rate success rates above 80%. According to DGGG guidelines, with acceptable fetal signal loss of 15%, only 39% (303/773) of the recordings could be assessed as accurate. No correlation between fECG signal quality, week of pregnancy and patient BMI was proved. CONCLUSIONS: The average signal loss in abdominal fECG monitoring in our study group was 32%. Low fECG signal quality may constitute a potentially limiting factor of the described fetal heart monitoring system. No relationship between fECG signal quality, week of pregnancy and patient BMI was proved.