Physiochemical disparity of mismatched HLA class I alloantigens and risk of acute GVHD following HSCT.

We determined whether assessment of the immunogenicity of individual donor-recipient HLA mismatches based on differences in their amino-acid sequence and physiochemical properties predicts clinical outcome following haematopoietic SCT (HSCT). We examined patients transplanted with 9/10 single HLA class I-mismatched grafts (n=171) and 10/10 HLA-A-, -B-, -C-, -DRB1- and -DQB1-matched grafts (n=168). A computer algorithm was used to determine the physiochemical disparity (electrostatic mismatch score (EMS) and hydrophobic mismatch score (HMS)) of mismatched HLA class I specificities in the graft-versus-host direction. Patients transplanted with HLA-mismatched grafts with high EMS/HMS had increased incidence of ⩾grade II acute GVHD (aGVHD) compared with patients transplanted with low EMS/HMS grafts; patients transplanted with low and medium EMS/HMS grafts had similar incidence of aGVHD to patients transplanted with 10/10 HLA-matched grafts. Mortality was higher following single HLA-mismatched HSCT but was not correlated with HLA physiochemical disparity. Assessment of donor-recipient HLA incompatibility based on physiochemical HLA disparity may enable better selection of HLA-mismatched donors in HSCT.

The impact of frequent HLA haplotypes in high linkage disequilibrium on donor search and clinical outcome after unrelated haematopoietic SCT.

The MHC region on chromosome 6 contains a large number of non-HLA genes next to the HLA genes. Matching for HLA in unrelated hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) does not necessarily mean that these non-HLA genes are also matched. We selected 348 Northwest European patients transplanted with an HLA-A-, -B-, -C-, -DRB1-, -DQB1-matched unrelated donor (MUD) between 1987 and 2008. Patients' haplotypes were identified via descend. We were unable to determine the haplotypes of the donor; therefore we used frequent haplotypes (FH) in high linkage disequilibrium (LD) as a proxy for haplotype matching. Presence of a FH in a patient positively affected the probability and speed of identifying a matched unrelated donor. Competing risk survival analysis showed that patients with one or two FH have a statistically significantly decreased probability of developing ≥ grade II acute GVDH (aGVHD) without increased risk of relapse compared to patients without FH (HR (95% CI): 0.53 (0.31-0.91)). This association was strongest for those FH with the highest LD between both HLA-A and -C or -B, and HLA-C or -B and -DRB1 (HR (95% CI): 0.49 (0.26-0.92)). These results extend evidence that non-HLA allele coding regions have a significant impact on development of ≥ grade II aGVHD. We conclude that there is more to successful HSCT than matching for HLA genes.

Predictive impact of allele-matching and EBMT risk score for outcome after T-cell depleted unrelated donor transplantation in poor-risk acute leukemia and myelodysplasia.

Many parameters predict for outcome after unrelated donor (URD) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). High-resolution HLA-matching significantly impacts outcome and also the European Group of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) risk score, based on patient age, disease stage, donor type, time from diagnosis to SCT and gender combination, may predict for non-relapse mortality and overall survival (OS). We evaluated the individual and combined effects of allele-matching and the EBMT risk score in 327 patients with poor-risk acute leukemia or myelodysplasia, who received a T-cell depleted URD alloSCT. Matching for HLA-A, -B, -C and -DRB1 alleles (8/8 match) was associated with a 5-year OS of 40% compared with 30% for mismatched (≤7/8) pairs (P=0.02). Patients with EBMT risk scores of 1-2, 3, 4 and 5-7 had 5-year OS estimates of 53, 43, 30 and 20%, respectively (P<0.001). The favorable prognostic impact of an 8/8 donor was most pronounced if the EBMT risk score was low (1-2). Five-year OS was 74±8% vs 39±11% for fully matched patients with a low-risk EBMT score as compared with EBMT low-risk patients with ≤7/8 donors. These data underscore the importance of incorporating both the EBMT risk score and the degree of high-resolution HLA-matching in the risk assessment prior to URD alloSCT.