RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Radiographs (XRs), computed tomography (CT) scans, and cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans are utilized for assessment of secondary alveolar bone graft (SABG) in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP). However, the optimal choice for imaging modality remains unclear. This study compares the image fidelity and safety profile for XR, CT, and CBCT in the assessment of patients with CLP who have undergone SABG. METHODS: Articles from MEDLINE and Elsevier Embase were screened. The primary outcome was graft success rate. Secondary outcomes were percent-by-volume of graft maintained and patient safety, defined by radiation exposure. A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled outcomes for each imaging modality. Chi-squared analysis was used to compare pooled outcomes between different imaging modalities. RESULTS: Of the 149 articles identified initially, 14 were included. Computed tomography exhibited a significantly higher image fidelity demonstrated by a lower graft success rate (62.0%) compared with both XR (72.6%, P<0.01) and CBCT (69.8%, P<0.01). Cone-beam CT had the lowest reported percent-by-volume of graft maintained (32.1%). Computed tomography had a higher mean radiation dosage (39.7 milligray) than what has been reported for both XR and CBCT. CONCLUSION: Computed tomography demonstrated lower graft success rates than both XR and CBCT, possibly indicating a higher image fidelity. However, compared with CBCT, CT may have a higher radiation exposure. Randomized trials and longitudinal studies are necessary to perform a direct comparison between CT and CBCT and to correlate the image fidelity of these modalities with clinical outcomes.
RESUMO
Web-based health information is the leading source of medical knowledge for patients and families. The American Medical Association (AMA) and US Department of Health and Human Services recommend reading material be at or below a sixth-grade reading level. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the readability of the most popularly searched cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) and other craniofacial syndrome (CFS) websites.Google searches for "cleft lip," "cleft palate," and "craniofacial syndromes" were performed to identify the top 40 websites in an incognito window with the location set to the United States. Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) was used to determine ease of reading from 0 (most difficult) to 100 (greatest ease of reading) and Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade (FKGL) for website content and compared between websites using an FRES of 80 to 90 and FKGL of 6.0 to 6.9 for a sixth-grade reading level.Readability was low for all sites with 6 CL/P websites and no CFS websites at or below a sixth-grade reading level. CL/P websites had FRES readability scores of 58.5 ± 12.3 and were at a 9.4 ± 2.3 grade level. CFS websites had readability scores on the FRES of 39.8 ± 13.1 and were at a 10.8 ± 1.8 grade level.Web-based information related to CL/P and CFS is on average several grade levels above the recommended sixth-grade reading level. Online information for CL/P and CFS may need to be revised to improve understanding for the public and families.
