Changing Dermatologic Procedural Patterns in the Medicare Population: A National Trend Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Dermatologists are trained in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for cutaneous lesions, yet comparative trends for basic dermatologic procedures across dermatology providers are lacking at the national level. OBJECTIVE: To trend common dermatologic procedures among general dermatologists, Mohs surgeons, primary care providers or primary care physicians (PCPs), and nonphysician clinicians (NPCs). METHODS: Longitudinal analysis of 2016 to 2021 Medicare Public Use Files. RESULTS: Aggregate dermatologic procedural volume decreased 3.0%. Procedural volume declined among general dermatologists (-11.7%), Mohs surgeons (-16.7%), and PCPs (-41.7%) but increased among NPCs (+57.5%). The proportion of procedures by general dermatologists decreased substantially for premalignant destructions (-6.2%), skin biopsies and shave removals (-4.7%), and malignant excisions (-4.1%) and more notably in counties that were nonmetro (-7.1%), low in income (-6.1%), and with <4.0 dermatologists per 100,000 population (-7.0%). CONCLUSION: Aggregate procedural volume decreased across the study period with general dermatologists, Mohs surgeons, and PCPs performing a progressively smaller proportion. The increase in procedures by NPCs may help to address demand but underscores the value of formalized procedural training. The procedural decline by general dermatologists in rural and low-income counties and those with baseline dermatologist shortages may exacerbate existing unmet need. Primary limitation included lack of commercial data.

Doxxing and Cyberbullying in Dermatology.

Doxxing, a type of cyberbullying, occurs when an individual's personal information is shared without consent and with malintent. Doxxing can be seen as a form of vigilantism, a way to hold others accountable for their actions or opinions; however, this form of justice can have catastrophic impacts on the victim, especially physicians. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, where physicians and healthcare providers strongly led public health advocacy efforts on social media, the frequency of doxxing and cyberbullying has increased. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives have also recently sparked controversy in dermatology and medicine, where advocates for DEI and those opposed to DEI initiatives have also been doxxed. This behavior is incredibly taxing on an individual's mental health, with substantial negative implications on a person's social, personal, and professional life. We discuss the ethical considerations of doxxing and avenues for better protecting physicians.

Relevance and Ethical Issues of Diversity Equity and Inclusion Programs, circa 2024-2025.

A recent resolution with approximately 100 signatories entitled "Sunsetting All Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Programs" administered by the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) sparked controversial debate within the field. Despite the AAD voting against the proposal to eliminate DEI initiatives, many underrepresented medical groups (URMs) wondered how to move forward and create safe spaces for everyone. We discuss the relevance of DEI programs in today's society and the ethical challenges that may arise. We conclude with actionable recommendations on how organizations can improve their current DEI strategies to ensure they are more inclusive and not perceived as discriminatory.

Disparities in Care for Psoriasis.

Race, ethnicity, language, sex, age, income, insurance status, location, and other socioeconomic and demographic factors influence access to and quality of care for patients with psoriasis, which can potentially lead to inequitable outcomes.

Growing Adoption of Immunohistochemistry by Mohs Micrographic Surgeons: A National Medicare Trend Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining can be used alongside Mohs micrographic surgery to aid in margin assessment of subtle tumors, yet existing estimates of IHC utilization have primarily relied on survey or older data that lacks stratification. OBJECTIVE: To characterize national IHC utilization trends by Mohs surgeons, stratifying by surgeon characteristics and modeling future adoption. METHODS: Longitudinal analysis of 2014 to 2021 Medicare Public Use Files. RESULTS: In 2021, 158 of 2,058 Mohs surgeons (7.7%) used IHC as compared with 4.0% in 2014 (average annual growth rate [AAGR] +3.6%). Adoption change was highest in the Northeast (AAGR +19.9%), whereas volume growth was greatest in the West (AAGR +25.2%). Multivariable regression revealed significantly greater utilization propensity among Mohs surgeons in academics (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.36), American College of Mohs Surgery (ACMS) members (aOR 2.12), and Micrographic Dermatologic Surgery (MDS)-certified surgeons (aOR 1.66). CONCLUSION: Mohs surgeons are steadily incorporating IHC into practice across all regions, with volume growth driven by higher adoption rates. Greater utilization among ACMS members, recipients of MDS certification, and those in academics suggests value of formalized training in enhancing comfort. Additional educational opportunities at conferences may aid in recognition of value and help identify solutions to address integration challenges.

Dermatology workforce projections in the United States, 2021 to 2036.

BACKGROUND: There has been a growing imbalance between supply of dermatologists and demand for dermatologic care. To best address physician shortages, it is important to delineate supply and demand patterns in the dermatologic workforce. The goal of this study was to explore dermatology supply and demand over time. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of workforce supply and demand projections for dermatologists from 2021 to 2036 using data from the Health Workforce Simulation Model from the National Center for Health Workforce Analysis. Estimates for total workforce supply and demand were summarized in aggregate and stratified by rurality. Scenarios with status quo demand and improved access were considered. RESULTS: Projected total supply showed a 12.45% increase by 2036. Total demand increased 12.70% by 2036 in the status quo scenario. In the improved access scenario, total supply was inadequate for total demand in any year, lagging by 28% in 2036. Metropolitan areas demonstrated a relative supply surplus up to 2036; nonmetropolitan areas had at least a 157% excess in demand throughout the study period. In 2021 adequacy was 108% and 39% adequacy for metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas, respectively; these differences were projected to continue through 2036. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the dermatology physician workforce is inadequate to meet the demand for dermatologic services in nonmetropolitan areas. Furthermore, improved access to dermatologic care would bolster demand and especially exacerbate workforce inadequacy in nonmetropolitan areas. Continued efforts are needed to address health inequities and ensure access to quality dermatologic care for all.

Ethics of artificial intelligence in dermatology.

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in dermatology holds promise for enhancing clinical accuracy, enabling earlier detection of skin malignancies, suggesting potential management of skin lesions and eruptions, and promoting improved continuity of care. AI implementation in dermatology, however, raises several ethical concerns. This review explores the current benefits and challenges associated with AI integration, underscoring ethical considerations related to autonomy, informed consent, and privacy. We also examine the ways in which beneficence, nonmaleficence, and distributive justice may be impacted. Clarifying the role of AI, striking a balance between security and transparency, fostering open dialogue with our patients, collaborating with developers of AI, implementing educational initiatives for dermatologists and their patients, and participating in the establishment of regulatory guidelines are essential to navigating ethical and responsible AI incorporation into dermatology.