Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a comparison of short-term surgical results.

AIM: To demonstrate the feasibility of single-port incisional hernia repair, quantify incision size, and compare results of patients operated by standard laparoscopy (SL) with those operated by the single-port technique [laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS)]. METHODS: Prospective data collected on patients operated from March 2008 to June 2010. Indication for surgery was incisional hernia >3 cm. There were no selection criteria for the enrollment of patients or the operative technique used. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were operated (18 women and 16 men): 15 with LESS and 19 with SL. There was no difference for age, body mass index, ASA scores, or number of previous surgical procedures. LESS patients had slightly larger (82 ± 54 vs. 64 ± 34 mm) and more numerous hernias: 3 (1 to 7) versus 1 (1 to 3). Adhesion grades, severity scores, and operating times (78.2 SD ± 31.2 vs. 73.5 SD ± 25.4 min, P=0.76) did not differ between the groups. The mean fascia incision size in LESS was digitally measured as 12.93 ± 2.01 mm. The hospital stay was a median of 1 day in both groups. There was 1 conversion in the SL group. The median follow-up time was 26 months (range, 25 to 31 mo) for LESS and 34 months (range, 31 to 42 mo) for SL. COMPLICATIONS: There were 2 seromas and 1 hematoma in the LESS group. In the SL group, there were 2 small-bowel injuries and 2 seromas. There were no recurrences in the SL group, 1 in LESS, and no port-site hernia so far. CONCLUSIONS: LESS incisional hernia repair through 1 minimal fascia incision is feasible. Early results do not indicate a longer operation time, higher complication, or higher recurrence rates.

The anatomical and surgical consequences of right colectomy for cancer.

BACKGROUND: Current practice when performing right colectomy for cancer is to divide the feeding vessels for the right colon on the right side of the superior mesenteric vein. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to show that arterial stumps can be visualized through an early postoperative CT and analyze their anatomical and surgical characteristics. DESIGN: This study presents a retrospective review of prospective data. SETTINGS: :The study was conducted at the Department of Surgery, Vestfold Hospital, Tonsberg, Norway. PATIENTS: Patients with leakage after a right colectomy for cancer (2003-2011) were identified through a local prospective complication registry (FileMaker Pro 9.0v3 software). INTERVENTIONS: Both preoperative and postoperative CTs were retrieved, reanalyzed, and 3-dimensionally reconstructed (Osirix v.3.0.2./Mimics v.13.1.). Patients without postoperative CTs were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcomes measured were length, caliber of presumed and actual arterial stumps, and their position relative to the superior mesenteric vein. RESULTS: Eighteen patients, median age 69 (10 men) were included. All patients had postoperative CTs, and 15 patients had preoperative CTs. Median time from operation to postoperative CT was 5 days. The ileocolic artery was found in 14 (11 CT pairs) patients, and the right colic artery was found in 5 (4 pairs) patients. Actual stump lengths were 28.0 mm (SD 9.3) and 37.3 mm (SD 14.9). A significant statistical difference between presumed and actual ileocolic artery stump lengths was found (P = .002). Posterior crossing to the superior mesenteric vein was noticed in 8 of 14 ileocolic arteries and in 3 of 5 right colic arteries. There was no statistical difference in mean caliber for the preoperative and postoperative right colic artery (P = .505) and ileocolic artery (P = .474). LIMITATIONS: Difficulties when interpreting the postoperative images, due to intra-abdominal effusion, staples, edema, and altered syntopy of blood vessels, were overcome through comparison with preoperative CTs. CONCLUSION: An early postoperative CT can show arterial stumps after right colectomy for cancer. These stumps appear to be significantly longer than presumed; implying a significant improvement potential when specimen size is concerned.