Gender differences in temporomandibular disorders in adult populational studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate gender differences in the prevalence of TMD. A systematic review was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and LILACS in duplicate by two independent reviewers. The inclusion criteria were cross-sectional studies that reported the prevalence of TMD for men and women and that used the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Axis I group diagnostic criteria:(group I = muscle disorders; group II = disc displacements; group III = arthralgias/arthritis/arthrosis).To be eligible for inclusion, studies must include adult individuals (>18 years) from a non-clinical population (ie without pre-diagnosis of TMD); in other words, from population-based studies. There were no restrictions on the year and language of publication. The quality of the articles was assessed by an adapted version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale(NOS), and the publication bias was assessed by a funnel plot graph. Data were quantitatively analysed by meta-analysis using odds ratio (OR) as the measure effect. The electronic search retrieved a total of 6104 articles, of which 112 articles were selected for full-text reading according to the eligibility criteria. By means of manual search, one study was retrieved. Five articles were selected for meta-analysis with a combined sample of 2518 subjects. Women had higher prevalence of TMD in all RDC/TMD diagnostic groups. The meta-analysis yielded the following results: (a) OR = 2.24 for global TMD (groups I, II and III combined), (b) OR = 2.09 for group I, (c) OR = 1.6 for group II and (d) OR = 2.08 for group III. The importance of gender in the development of TMD has been demonstrated, with a two times greater risk of women to develop it as compared to men.

Reduced neuropsychologic measures as predictors of treatment outcome in patients with temporomandibular disorders.

AIMS: To determine via a prospective investigation whether the presence of neuropsychologic or cognitive deficiencies could be identified in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and used to predict treatment outcome. This was based on the theory that measurable reductions in neuropsychologic and cognitive function might have a negative impact on treatment outcome in patients with essentially nontraumatic TMD, as has been shown for patients with posttraumatic TMD. METHODS: Various neuropsychologic, psychosocial, and clinical parameters (including but not limited to the Peterson-Peterson Consonant Trigram Test and the California Verbal Learning Test) were used to pretest patients suffering from TMD prior to treatment. Patients were then entered into treatment, after which determination of treatment success was made both by the use of visual analog scales for pain and global transitional outcome measures (e.g., "better," responders versus "same/worse," nonresponders). After determination of treatment success was made, treatment response was correlated with the various clinical, cognitive, and neuropsychologic test scores. RESULTS: Overall, the nonresponders did worse in both the neuropsychologic and psychosocial assessments, with greater memory deficits, sleep disturbances, depression, and fatigue and lower energy levels as compared to responders. Among the best predictors of treatment outcome were the Peterson-Peterson Consonant Trigram Test scores, as well as the scores on the California Verbal Learning Test (i.e., poorer test outcomes predicted nonresponse). Neither responders nor nonresponders could be distinguished from one another based on clinical parameters of maximum interincisal opening or muscle tenderness. Three psychosocial variables were also found to be predictors of poor outcome: sleep disturbance, fatigue, and income. Pretreatment pain on chewing was also found to be a reliable predictor of poor treatment outcome. CONCLUSION: We conclude that various neuropsychologic, psychosocial, and some clinical parameters may provide pretreatment prediction of treatment outcome in an idiopathic TMD population.

Sensory and affective components of orofacial pain: is it all in your brain?

In this paper, we shall review several chronic orofacial pain conditions with emphasis on those that are essentially refractory to treatment. We shall present a review of current and past literature that describes the various pain phenomena as well as their underlying central mechanisms. New data concerning refractory pain will be used to underscore the importance of central processing of pain, with particular emphasis on neuropsychological and cognitive function and capacity that may play important roles in pain processing and maintenance of the pain state. Further, neurophysiological data showing that the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and other structures in the brain may play key roles in modulation of chronic pain will also be discussed. Although peripheral triggering events surely play an important role in initiating pain, the development of chronic and, in particular, refractory pain may depend on changes or malfunctions in the central nervous system. These changes may be quite subtle and require sophisticated approaches, such as functional MRI, to study them, as is now being done. New findings obtained therefore may lead to more rational and reliable treatment for orofacial pain.