A multicenter, phase 1, Adult Brain Tumor Consortium trial of oral terameprocol for patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (GATOR).

Recurrent high-grade gliomas (rHGGs) have a dismal prognosis, where the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of IV terameprocol (5 days/month), a transcriptional inhibitor of specificity protein 1 (Sp1)-regulated proteins, is 1,700 mg/day with median area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of 31.3 µg∗h/mL. Given potentially increased efficacy with sustained systemic exposure and challenging logistics of daily IV therapy, here we investigate oral terameprocol for rHGGs in a multicenter, phase 1 trial (GATOR). Using a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, we enroll 20 patients, with median age 60 years (range 31-80), 70% male, and median one relapse (range 1-3). Fasting patients tolerate 1,200 mg/day (n = 3), 2,400 mg/day (n = 6), 3,600 mg/day (n = 3), and 6,000 mg/day (n = 2) oral doses without major toxicities. However, increased dosage does not lead to increased systemic exposure, including in fed state (6,000 mg/day, n = 4), with maximal AUC <5 µg∗h/mL. These findings warrant trials investigating approaches that provide sustained systemic levels of transcription inhibitors to exploit their therapeutic potential. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02575794).

Phase I and pharmacodynamic study of arsenic trioxide plus radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Background: When arsenic trioxide (ATO) was combined with radiation for treatment of transplanted murine gliomas in the brain, tumor response improved with disrupted tumor blood flow and survival was significantly prolonged. Methods: Total of 31 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were accrued to a multi-institutional, NCI-funded, phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ATO administered with radiation. Secondary objectives were survival and pharmacodynamic changes in perfusion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients (unknown MGMT and IDH status) received ATO either once or twice weekly during radiation without concurrent or adjuvant temozolomide. Results: Median age: 54.9 years, male: 68%, KPS ≥ 90: 77%, debulking surgery: 77%. Treatments were well-tolerated: 81% of patients received all the planned ATO doses. Dose-limiting toxicities included elevated liver function tests, hypokalemia, and edema. The MTD on the weekly schedule was 0.4 mg/kg and on the biweekly was 0.3 mg/kg. The median survival (mOS) for all patients was 17.7 months. Survival on the biweekly schedule (22.8 months) was longer than on the weekly schedule (12.1 months) (P = .039) as was progression-free survival (P = .004). Similarly, cerebral blood flow was significantly reduced in patients treated on the biweekly schedule (P = .007). Conclusions: ATO with standard radiation is well tolerated in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Even without temozolomide or adjuvant therapy, the overall survival of all patients (17.7 months) and especially patients who received biweekly ATO (22.8 months) is surprising and accompanied by pharmacodynamic changes on MRI. Further studies of this regimen are warranted.

Evaluating the Base Excision Repair Inhibitor TRC102 and Temozolomide for patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma in the Phase 2 Adult Brain Tumor Consortium Trial BERT.

PURPOSE: Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) have a dismal prognosis. While DNA alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ) is mainstay of chemotherapy, therapeutic resistance develops rapidly in patients. Base excision repair inhibitor TRC102 (methoxyamine) reverses TMZ resistance in preclinical glioma models. We sought to investigate efficacy and safety of oral TRC102+TMZ for recurrent GBM (rGBM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A pre-registered (NCT02395692), non-randomized, multicenter, phase 2 clinical trial (BERT) was planned and conducted through the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC-1402). Arm 1 included bevacizumab-naïve GBM patients at first recurrence, with primary endpoint of response rates. If sufficient activity was identified, a second arm was planned in bevacizumab-refractory patients. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), PFS at six months (PFS-6), and toxicity. RESULTS: Arm 1 enrolled 19 patients with median of two treatment cycles. Objective responses were not observed, hence, arm 2 did not open. Median OS was 11.1 months (95%CI 8.2-17.9). Median PFS was 1.9 months (95%CI 1.8-3.7). PFS-6 was 10.5% (95%CI 1.3-33.1%). Most toxicities were Grade 1-2, with two Grade 3 lymphopenias and one Grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Two patients with PFS ≥17 months and OS >32 months were deemed 'extended survivors'. RNA sequencing of tumor tissue, obtained at diagnosis, demonstrated significantly enriched signatures of DNA damage response (DDR), chromosomal instability (CIN70, CIN25), and cellular proliferation (PCNA25) in 'extended survivors'. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm safety and feasibility of TRC102+TMZ for rGBM patients. They also warrant further evaluation of combination therapy in biomarker-enriched trials enrolling GBM patients with baseline hyperactivated DDR pathways.

Response Rate and Molecular Correlates to Encorafenib and Binimetinib in BRAF-V600E Mutant High-Grade Glioma.

PURPOSE: Although fewer than 5% of high-grade gliomas (HGG) are BRAF-V600E mutated, these tumors are notable as BRAF-targeted therapy shows efficacy for some populations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate response to the combination of encorafenib with binimetinib in adults with recurrent BRAF-V600-mutated HGG. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase 2, open-label, Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC) trial (NCT03973918), encorafenib and binimetinib were administered at their FDA-approved doses continuously in 28-day cycles. Eligible patients were required to have HGG or glioblastoma with a BRAF-V600E alteration that was recurrent following at least one line of therapy, including radiotherapy. RESULTS: Five patients enrolled between January 2020 and administrative termination in November 2021 (due to closure of the ABTC). Enrolled patients received treatment for 2 to 40 months; currently one patient remains on treatment. Centrally determined radiographic response rate was 60%, with one complete response and two partial responses. Methylation profiling revealed that all tumors cluster most closely with anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA). Transcriptional profile for MAPK-response signature was similar across all tumors at baseline and did not correlate with response in this small population. Circulating tumor DNA measured in plasma samples before treatment, during response, and upon progression showed feasibility of detection for the BRAF-V600E alteration. No new safety signal was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Encorafenib and binimetinib exhibit positive tumor responses in patients with recurrent BRAF-V600E mutant HGG in this small series, warranting therapeutic consideration. Although toxicity remains a concern for BRAF-targeted therapies, no new safety signal was observed in these patients.

Clinical trials of R-(-)-gossypol (AT-101) in newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma: NABTT 0602 and NABTT 0702.

PURPOSE: AT-101 is an oral bcl-2 family protein inhibitor (Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, Mcl-1, Bcl-W) and potent inducer of proapoptotic proteins. A prior study of the parent compound, racemic gossypol, demonstrated objective and durable responses in patients with malignant glioma. AT-101 has demonstrated synergy with radiation in animal models. The objectives of trial NABTT 0602 were to determine the MTD of AT-101 concurrent with temozolomide (TMZ) and radiation therapy (RT) (Arm I) and to determine the MTD of AT-101 when given with adjuvant TMZ after completion of standard chemoradiation (Arm 2). Separately in trial NABTT 0702, the survival and response rates of single agent AT-101 were evaluated in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. METHODS: In NABTT 0602 Phase I, a 3+3 design was used to define MTDs after maximal safe resection, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma received standard concurrent RT (60 Gy) and TMZ 75 mg/m2/day followed by adjuvant TMZ 150-200 mg/m2 days 1-5 in 28-day cycles (Stupp regimen). In Arm I, AT-101 was administered M-F during the six weeks of RT beginning 20 mg qd. In Arm 2, concurrent with each adjuvant cycle of TMZ, AT-101 was administered at a starting dose of 20 mg, days 1-21 followed by 7-day break for a maximum of 6 cycles. The PK blood samples were collected in the first three patients in each cohort of arm 1. In NABTT 0702 patients with recurrent glioblastoma received 20 mg p.o. per day for 21 of 28 days in repeated cycles to assess overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of sixteen patients were enrolled on the two study arms of NABTT 0602. In Arm 1 AT-101 was escalated from 20 to 30 mg where one of six patients experienced DLT (grade 3 GI ulcer). On Arm 2 one patient treated at 20 mg experienced DLT (grade 3 ileus, nausea and diarrhea). The cohort was expanded to include seven patients without observation of DLT. PK results were consistent with drug levels from non-CNS studies. At study closure six patients are still alive. The median survival times for Arm I and Arm II are 15.2 months and 18.2 months, respectively. In NABTT 0702 fifty-six patients were enrolled and forty-three were eligible for imaging response. Sixteen patients (29%) had stable disease as best response and one partial response was observed. The median OS with single agent AT-101 was 5.7 months (95%CI: 3.8-7.6 months) for patients with rGBM. CONCLUSIONS: AT-101 can be safely administered with radiation therapy and TMZ in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma without toxicity unique to patients with CNS tumors. Because of toxicity observed in non-CNS AT-101 clinical trials, further dose-escalation was not attempted. The recommended dose for future studies that utilize continual AT-101 exposure is 20 mg days M-F concurrent with RT/TMZ and 20 mg days 1-21 for each 28-day cycle of TMZ. AT-101 has limited activity as a single agent in unselected patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Future trials should attempt to better understand resistance mechanisms and consider combination therapy.

Druggable genomic landscapes of high-grade gliomas.

Background: Despite the putatively targetable genomic landscape of high-grade gliomas, the long-term survival benefit of genomically-tailored targeted therapies remains discouraging. Methods: Using glioblastoma (GBM) as a representative example of high-grade gliomas, we evaluated the clonal architecture and distribution of hotspot mutations in 388 GBMs from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Mutations were matched with 54 targeted therapies, followed by a comprehensive evaluation of drug biochemical properties in reference to the drug's clinical efficacy in high-grade gliomas. We then assessed clinical outcomes of a cohort of patients with high-grade gliomas with targetable mutations reviewed at the Johns Hopkins Molecular Tumor Board (JH MTB; n = 50). Results: Among 1,156 sequence alterations evaluated, 28.6% represented hotspots. While the frequency of hotspot mutations in GBM was comparable to cancer types with actionable hotspot alterations, GBMs harbored a higher fraction of subclonal mutations that affected hotspots (7.0%), compared to breast cancer (4.9%), lung cancer (4.4%), and melanoma (1.4%). In investigating the biochemical features of targeted therapies paired with recurring alterations, we identified a trend toward higher lipid solubility and lower IC50 in GBM cell lines among drugs with clinical efficacy. The drugs' half-life, molecular weight, surface area and binding to efflux transporters were not associated with clinical efficacy. Among the JH MTB cohort of patients with IDH1 wild-type high-grade gliomas who received targeted therapies, trametinib monotherapy or in combination with dabrafenib conferred radiographic partial response in 75% of patients harboring BRAF or NF1 actionable mutations. Cabozantinib conferred radiographic partial response in two patients harboring a MET and a PDGFRA/KDR amplification. Patients with IDH1 wild-type gliomas that harbored actionable alterations who received genotype-matched targeted therapy had longer progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS; 7.37 and 14.72 respectively) than patients whose actionable alterations were not targeted (2.83 and 4.2 months respectively). Conclusion: While multiple host, tumor and drug-related features may limit the delivery and efficacy of targeted therapies for patients with high-grade gliomas, genotype-matched targeted therapies confer favorable clinical outcomes. Further studies are needed to generate more data on the impact of biochemical features of targeted therapies on their clinical efficacy for high-grade gliomas.

A multi-site phase I trial of Veliparib with standard radiation and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).

PURPOSE: A multi-site Phase I trial was conducted to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of Veliparib, a Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase [PARP] enzyme inhibitor, when administered with temozolomide (TMZ) alone and then with temozolomide and radiation (RT) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. METHODS: Given the potential for myelosuppression when a PARP inhibitor is combined with chemotherapy, the first 6 patients accrued were given Veliparib 10 mg bid and TMZ 75 mg/m2/d daily for six weeks. If this was well tolerated, the same doses of Veliparib and TMZ would be tested along with standard radiation with plans to dose escalate the Veliparib in subsequent patient cohorts. Once a maximal tolerated dose was determined, a 78 patient phase II study was planned. Peripheral blood pharmacokinetics were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled. In the first 6 patients who received 6 weeks of TMZ with Veliparib only one dose limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred. The next 12 patients received 6 weeks of RT + TMZ + veliparib and 4/12 (33%) had dose limiting hematologic toxicities. As a result, Veliparib was reduced by 50% to 10 mg BID every other week, but again 3/3 patients had dose limiting hematologic toxicities. The trial was then terminated. The mean clearance (± SD) CL/F of Veliparib for the initial dose (27.0 ± 9.0 L/h, n = 16) and at steady-state for 10 mg BID (23.5 ± 10.4 L/h, n = 18) were similar. Accumulation for BID dosing was 56% (± 33%). CONCLUSIONS: Although Veliparib 10 mg BID administered with TMZ 75 mg/m2 for six weeks was well tolerated, when this regimen was combined with standard partial brain irradiation it was severely myelosuppressive even when the dose was reduced by 50%. This study again highlights the potential of localized cranial radiotherapy to significantly increase hematologic toxicity of marginally myelosuppressive systemic therapies.

A Multi-Site Phase I Trial of Veliparib with Standard Radiation and Temozolomide in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM).

Purpose: A multi-site Phase I trial was conducted to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of Veliparib, a Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase [PARP] enzyme inhibitor, when administered with temozolomide (TMZ) alone and then with temozolomide and radiation (RT) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Methods: Given the potential for myelosuppression when a PARP inhibitor is combined with chemotherapy, the first 6 patients accrued were given Veliparib 10 mg bid and TMZ 75 mg/m2/d daily for six weeks. If this was well tolerated, the same doses of Veliparib and TMZ would be tested along with standard radiation with plans to dose escalate the Veliparib in subsequent patient cohorts. Once a maximal tolerated dose was determined, a 78 patient phase II study was planned. Peripheral blood pharmacokinetics were assessed. Results: Twenty-four patients were enrolled. In the first 6 patients who received 6 weeks of TMZ with Veliparib only one dose limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred. The next 12 patients received 6 weeks of RT + TMZ + veliparib and 4/12 (33%) had dose limiting hematologic toxicities. As a result, Veliparib was reduced by 50% to 10 mg BID every other week, but again 3/3 patients had dose limiting hematologic toxicities. The trial was then terminated. The mean clearance (± SD) CL/F of Veliparib for the initial dose (27.0 ± 9.0 L/h, n = 16) and at steady-state for 10 mg BID (23.5 ± 10.4 L/h, n = 18) were similar. Accumulation for BID dosing was 56% (± 33%). Conclusions: Although Veliparib 10 mg BID administered with TMZ 75 mg/m2 for six weeks was well tolerated, when this regimen was combined with standard partial brain irradiation it was severely myelosuppressive even when the dose was reduced by 50%. This study again highlights the potential of localized cranial radiotherapy to significantly increase hematologic toxicity of marginally myelosuppressive systemic therapies.

Activity of a first-in-class oral HIF2-alpha inhibitor, PT2385, in patients with first recurrence of glioblastoma.

INTRODUCTION: Hypoxia inducible factor 2-alpha (HIF2α) mediates cellular responses to hypoxia and is over-expressed in glioblastoma (GBM). PT2385 is an oral HIF2α inhibitor with in vivo activity against GBM. METHODS: A two-stage single-arm open-label phase II study of adults with GBM at first recurrence following chemoradiation with measurable disease was conducted through the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium. PT2385 was administered at the phase II dose (800 mg b.i.d.). The primary outcome was objective radiographic response (ORR = complete response + partial response, CR + PR); secondary outcomes were safety, overall survival (OS), and progression free survival (PFS). Exploratory objectives included pharmacokinetics (day 15 Cmin), pharmacodynamics (erythropoietin, vascular endothelial growth factor), and pH-weighted amine- chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI to quantify tumor acidity at baseline and explore associations with drug response. Stage 1 enrolled 24 patients with early stoppage for ≤ 1 ORR. RESULTS: Of the 24 enrolled patients, median age was 62.1 (38.7-76.7) years, median KPS 80, MGMT promoter was methylated in 46% of tumors. PT2385 was well tolerated. Grade ≥ 3 drug-related adverse events were hypoxia (n = 2), hyponatremia (2), lymphopenia (1), anemia (1), and hyperglycemia (1). No objective radiographic responses were observed; median PFS was 1.8 months (95% CI 1.6-2.5) and OS was 7.7 months (95% CI 4.9-12.6). Drug exposure varied widely and did not differ by corticosteroid use (p = 0.12), antiepileptics (p = 0.09), or sex (p = 0.37). Patients with high systemic exposure had significantly longer PFS (6.7 vs 1.8 months, p = 0.009). Baseline acidity by pH-weighted CEST MRI correlated significantly with treatment duration (R2 = 0.49, p = 0.017). Non-enhancing infiltrative disease with high acidity gave rise to recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: PT2385 monotherapy had limited activity in first recurrent GBM. Drug exposure was variable. Signals of activity were observed in GBM patients with high systemic exposure and acidic lesions on CEST imaging. A second-generation HIF2α inhibitor is being studied.

CEST2022: Amide proton transfer-weighted MRI improves the diagnostic performance of multiparametric non-contrast-enhanced MRI techniques in patients with post-treatment high-grade gliomas.

New or enlarged lesions in malignant gliomas after surgery and chemoradiation can be associated with tumor recurrence or treatment effect. Due to similar radiographic characteristics, conventional-and even some advanced MRI techniques-are limited in distinguishing these two pathologies. Amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) MRI, a protein-based molecular imaging technique that does not require the administration of any exogenous contrast agent, was recently introduced into the clinical setting. In this study, we evaluated and compared the diagnostic performances of APTw MRI with several non-contrast-enhanced MRI sequences, such as diffusion-weighted imaging, susceptibility-weighted imaging, and pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling. Thirty-nine scans from 28 glioma patients were obtained on a 3 T MRI scanner. A histogram analysis approach was employed to extract parameters from each tumor area. Statistically significant parameters (P < 0.05) were selected to train multivariate logistic regression models to evaluate the performance of MRI sequences. Multiple histogram parameters, particularly from APTw and pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling images, demonstrated significant differences between treatment effect and recurrent tumor. The regression model trained on the combination of all significant histogram parameters achieved the best result (area under the curve = 0.89). We found that APTw images added value to other advanced MR images for the differentiation of treatment effect and tumor recurrence.

In-vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy of lactate as a non-invasive biomarker of dichloroacetate activity in cancer and non-cancer central nervous system disorders.

The adverse effects of lactic acidosis in the cancer microenvironment have been increasingly recognized. Dichloroacetate (DCA) is an orally bioavailable, blood brain barrier penetrable drug that has been extensively studied in the treatment of mitochondrial neurologic conditions to reduce lactate production. Due to its effect reversing aerobic glycolysis (i.e., Warburg-effect) and thus lactic acidosis, DCA became a drug of interest in cancer as well. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a well-established, non-invasive technique that allows detection of prominent metabolic changes, such as shifts in lactate or glutamate levels. Thus, MRS is a potential radiographic biomarker to allow spatial and temporal mapping of DCA treatment. In this systematic literature review, we gathered the available evidence on the use of various MRS techniques to track metabolic changes after DCA administration in neurologic and oncologic disorders. We included in vitro, animal, and human studies. Evidence confirms that DCA has substantial effects on lactate and glutamate levels in neurologic and oncologic disease, which are detectable by both experimental and routine clinical MRS approaches. Data from mitochondrial diseases show slower lactate changes in the central nervous system (CNS) that correlate better with clinical function compared to blood. This difference is most striking in focal impairments of lactate metabolism suggesting that MRS might provide data not captured by solely monitoring blood. In summary, our findings corroborate the feasibility of MRS as a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic biomarker of DCA delivery in the CNS, that is ready to be integrated into currently ongoing and future human clinical trials using DCA.

ABTC-0904: targeting glioma stem cells in GBM: a phase 0/II study of hedgehog pathway inhibitor GDC-0449.

PURPOSE: Gliomagenesis and resistance of glioblastoma (GBM) are believed to be mediated by glioma stem cells (GSC). Evidence suggests that SHH signaling promotes GSC proliferation and self-renewal. METHODS: ABTC-0904 was a two-arm, multicenter phase 0/II study of GDC-0449, an oral inhibitor of Smoothened (SMO) in patients undergoing resection for recurrent GBM. All patients (Arms I and II) had surgery and received drug post-operatively. Only patients in Arm I received drug prior to surgery. The primary objective was to determine 6-month progression free survival (PFS-6). Secondary endpoints include median PFS (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS), response rate, and toxicity. Correlative studies included bioanalysis of GDC-0449, and inhibition of SHH signaling, GSC proliferation and self-renewal. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were enrolled. Pharmacokinetics of GDC-0449 in plasma demonstrated levels within expected therapeutic range in 75% of patients. The proportion of tumorcells producing CD133+ neurospheres, neurosphere proliferation, self-renewal, and expression of the SHh downstream signaling was significantly decreased in Arm I following GDC-0449 treatment (p < 0.005; p < 0.001 respectively) compared to Arm II (no drug pre-op). Treatment was well tolerated. There were no objective responders in either arm. Overall PFS-6 was 2.4% (95% CI 0.9-11.1%). Median PFS was 2.3 months (95% CI 1.9-2.6) and mOS was 7.8 months (95% CI 5.4-10.1). CONCLUSIONS: GDC-0449 was well tolerated, reached tumor, and inhibited CD133+ neurosphere formation, but had little clinical efficacy as a single agent in rGBM. This suggests growth and maintenance of rGBM is not solely dependent on the SHH pathway thus targeting SMO may require combined approaches.

Lymphocyte Depletion Rate as a Biomarker of Radiation Dose to Circulating Lymphocytes During Fractionated Partial-Body Radiation Therapy.

Purpose: Radiation causes exponential depletion of circulating lymphocyte populations; in turn, radiation-induced lymphopenia is associated with worse survival for many solid tumors, possibly owing to attenuated antitumor immune responses. Identifying reliable and reproducible methods of calculating the radiation dose to circulating immune cells may facilitate development of techniques to reduce the risk and severity of radiation-induced toxic effects to circulating lymphocytes. Methods and Materials: Patient-specific lymphocyte loss rates were derived from a clinical data set including 684 adult patients with solid tumors. Multivariable linear regression was used to model the relationship between the lymphocyte loss rate and physical parameters of the radiation plan that determine circulating blood dose. Results: During partial-body radiation, lymphocyte loss rates are determined by physical parameters of the radiation plan that reflect radiation exposure to circulating cells, including target volume size, dose per fraction squared, and anatomic site treated. Differences in observed versus predicted lymphocyte loss rates may be partly explained by variations in concurrent chemotherapy regimens. Conclusions: We describe a novel method of using patient-specific lymphocyte loss kinetics to approximate the effective radiation dose to circulating lymphocytes during focal fractionated photon radiation therapy. Clinical applications of these findings include the early identification of patients at particularly high risk of severe radiation-induced lymphopenia based on physical parameters of the radiation therapy plan.

Safety of temozolomide use in adult patients with renal dysfunction.

PURPOSE: Temozolomide (TMZ), a cytotoxic DNA alkylating agent, is the main chemotherapy used for the treatment of high grade astrocytomas. The active alkylator, methylhydrazine, is not recovered in urine and thus renal function is not expected to affect clearance. Prescribing information for TMZ states pharmacokinetics have not been studied in adults with poor renal function, eGFR < 36 mL/min/1.73 m2. We reviewed our clinical experience with TMZ in patients with impaired renal function to evaluate safety of administering full dose TMZ. METHODS: The primary endpoint was to characterize the incidence and severity of thrombocytopenia in patients with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 who received TMZ for treatment of high grade gliomas (HGG) or primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). Secondary endpoints included incidence and severity of neutropenia, lymphopenia hepatotoxicity, and number of TMZ cycles administered. Medical records of patients with HGG or PCNSL treated with TMZ from October 1, 2016-September 30, 2019 were accessed to identify cases for this study. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were eligible for this study. Of the seven patients with eGFR < 36 mL/min/1.73m2, 38/39 cycles (97%) were completed without grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. No patients experienced grade 3-4 neutropenia, and grade 3-4 lymphopenia occurred in 5 cycles (15%). One patient discontinued TMZ 7 days prior to completion of radiation due to thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: Hematologic toxicity in patients with severe renal dysfunction, eGFR < 36 mL/min/1.73m2, is similar to that of patients with normal renal function. Severe renal impairment does not preclude use of temozolomide, but cautious monitoring of blood counts is warranted.

High-grade glioma therapy: adding flexibility in trial design to improve patient outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Outcomes for patients with high grade gliomas have changed little over the past thirty years. This realization prompted renewed efforts to increase flexibility in the design and conduct of clinical brain tumor trials. AREAS COVERED: This manuscript reviews the development of clinical trial methods, challenges and considerations of flexible clinical trial designs, approaches to improve identification and testing of active agents for high grade gliomas, and evaluation of their delivery to the central nervous system. EXPERT OPINION: Flexibility can be introduced in clinical trials in several ways. Flexible designs tout smaller sample sizes, adaptive modifications, fewer control arms, and inclusion of multiple arms in one study. Unfortunately, modifications in study designs cannot address two challenges that are largely responsible for the lack of progress in treating high grade gliomas: 1) the identification of active pharmaceutical agents and 2) the delivery of these agents to brain tumor tissue in therapeutic concentrations. To improve the outcomes of patients with high grade gliomas efforts must be focused on the pre-clinical screening of drugs for activity, the ability of these agents to achieve therapeutic concentrations in non-enhancing tumors, and a willingness to introduce novel compounds in minimally pre-treated patient populations.

Transient Opening of the Blood-Brain Barrier by Vasoactive Peptides to Increase CNS Drug Delivery: Reality Versus Wishful Thinking?

BACKGROUND: The blood-brain barrier inhibits the central nervous system penetration of 98% of small molecule drugs and virtually all biologic agents, which has limited progress in treating neurologic disease. Vasoactive peptides have been shown in animal studies to transiently disrupt the blood-brain barrier and regadenoson is currently being studied in humans to determine if it can improve drug delivery to the brain. However, many other vasoactive peptides could potentially be used for this purpose. METHODS: We performed a review of the literature evaluating the physiologic effects of vasoactive peptides on the vasculature of the brain and systemic organs. To assess the likelihood that a vasoactive peptide might transiently disrupt the blood-brain barrier, we devised a four-tier classification system to organize the available evidence. RESULTS: We identified 32 vasoactive peptides with potential blood-brain barrier permeabilityaltering properties. To date, none of these are shown to open the blood-brain barrier in humans. Twelve vasoactive peptides increased blood-brain barrier permeability in rodents. The remaining 20 had favorable physiologic effects on blood vessels but lacked specific information on permeability changes to the blood-brain barrier. CONCLUSION: Vasoactive peptides remain an understudied class of drugs with the potential to increase drug delivery and improve treatment in patients with brain tumors and other neurologic diseases. Dozens of vasoactive peptides have yet to be formally evaluated for this important clinical effect. This narrative review summarizes the available data on vasoactive peptides, highlighting agents that deserve further in vitro and in vivo investigations.

Glioblastoma Clinical Trials: Current Landscape and Opportunities for Improvement.

Therapeutic advances for glioblastoma have been minimal over the past 2 decades. In light of the multitude of recent phase III trials that have failed to meet their primary endpoints following promising preclinical and early-phase programs, a Society for Neuro-Oncology Think Tank was held in November 2020 to prioritize areas for improvement in the conduct of glioblastoma clinical trials. Here, we review the literature, identify challenges related to clinical trial eligibility criteria and trial design in glioblastoma, and provide recommendations from the Think Tank. In addition, we provide a data-driven context with which to frame this discussion by analyzing key study design features of adult glioblastoma clinical trials listed on ClinicalTrials.gov as "recruiting" or "not yet recruiting" as of February 2021.