Excessive tryptophan catabolism along the kynurenine pathway precedes ongoing sepsis in critically ill patients.

It has recently been shown that an increased plasma level of the tryptophan catabolite kynurenine is an early indicator for the development of sepsis in major trauma patients. We examined the predictive value of kynurenine pathway activity for ongoing sepsis in patients being admitted to a surgical intensive care unit for different reasons. In addition, we asked whether an accumulation of kynurenines in patients' plasma depends on reduced renal clearance. We conducted a prospective observational study including 100 consecutive patients and monitored laboratory variables, physiological and adverse events, sepsis and outcome. Using tandem mass spectrometry, we quantified the five indoleamines tryptophan, serotonin (5-HT), kynurenine, quinolinic acid and kynurenic acid at baseline and twice a week during the intensive care unit stay. Among the patients enrolled, 50 did not develop sepsis in the intensive care unit (non-septic), 18 patients did not have sepsis at baseline but developed sepsis later on (pre-septic) and 32 patients already fulfilled the criteria of severe sepsis and septic shock at baseline (septic). In general, non-septic critically ill patients showed activation of the kynurenine pathway, but septic shock coincided with an exacerbation of kynurenine pathway activity even in the absence of renal failure. Importantly, plasma concentrations of quinolinic acid (area under the curve 0.832 [95% confidence interval 0.710 to 0.954]) and the Quin/Trp ratio (area under the curve 0.835 [95% confidence interval; 0.719 to 0.952]) showed the best discrimination between non-septic and pre-septic patients at baseline. These findings open new avenues for further investigations on the pathophysiology of sepsis.

[Study protocol of the VISEP study. Response of the SepNet study group]. / Studienprotokoll der VISEP-Studie. Entgegnung der SepNet-Studiengruppe.

In the commentary by Zander et al. the authors appear concerned about the methods and results of our, at that time, unpublished sepsis trial evaluating hydroxyethyl starch (HES) and insulin therapy. Unfortunately, the authors' concerns are based on false assumptions about the design, conduct and modes of action of the compounds under investigation. For instance, in our study the HES solution was not used for maintenance of daily fluid requirements, so that the assumption of the authors that this colloid was used "exclusively" is wrong. Moreover, the manufacturer of Hemohes, the HES product we used, gives no cut-off value for creatinine, thus the assumption that this cut-off value was "doubled" in our study is also incorrect. Other claims by the authors such as that lactated solutions cause elevated lactate levels, iatrogenic hyperglycemia and increase O(2) consumption are unfounded. There is no randomized controlled trial supporting such a claim - this claim is neither consistent with our study data nor with any credible published sepsis guidelines or with routine practice worldwide. We fully support open scientific debate. Our study methods and results have now been published after a strict peer-reviewing process and this data is now open to critical and constructive reviewing. However, in our opinion this premature action based on wrong assumptions and containing comments by representatives of pharmaceutical companies does not contribute to a serious, unbiased scientific discourse.