Prevention of depression in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Depression and depressive symptoms are prevalent in patients with cancer. Depression is underdiagnosed and therefore, patients often receive inadequate treatment for depression. We have assessed the evidence of primary prophylactic treatment for depression in patients with cancer. The systematic review was prospectively registered at PROSPERO and was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Five electronic databases were searched on the 31st of May 2018 and two independent reviewers screened the papers. Randomized controlled trials of adult patients with cancer treated prophylactically with an antidepressive intervention of any kind using validated assessment tools to measure depression or depressive symptoms were included. No language or publication year restrictions were applied. Seven out of eighteen studies reported a statistically significant prophylactic effect on depression. The studies were classified into three groups based on the type of intervention. The meta-analyses showed a significant difference in favour of pharmacotherapy (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18; 0.63), psychotherapy (SMD -0.23,95% CI -0.46; 0.00), and other interventions (SMD -0.17, 95% CI -0.31; -0.03). Only one study had overall low risk of bias and the rest had high risk of bias predominantly due to blinding, incomplete data, or allocation concealment. Preventive measures have been examined in patients with cancer, but no convincing evidence for any specific intervention is present. Depression in patients with cancer can be prevented and prophylactic treatment should be given during oncological treatment but further high quality studies testing safe interventions are still needed.

The effect of melatonin on depressive symptoms and anxiety in patients after acute coronary syndrome: The MEDACIS randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Depression following acute coronary syndrome is prevalent and associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Melatonin may function as a primary prophylactic antidepressant substance and alleviate depressive symptoms. The study was undertaken to determine if melatonin administered following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) could prevent development of depression. METHODS: The study was a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized clinical trial performed in five primary care cardiology departments at Zealand, Denmark. Included patients were adults patients, free of depression at baseline, included at the latest 4 weeks after acute coronary syndrome. Twenty-five mg melatonin or placebo was administered 1 h before participants' bedtime for 12 weeks. The primary outcome is Major Depression Inventory (MDI) measured every two weeks throughout the trial. Incidence of depression was apriori defined as MDI score ≥ 21 during the trial. Reported exploratory outcomes were patterns of dropout and safety outcomes. RESULTS: 1220 patients were screened and 252 participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio. Baseline MDI score in the melatonin and placebo group were, respectively, 6.18 (CI 5.32-7.05) and 5.98 (CI 5.19-6.77). No significant intergroup differences were found during the study in the intention-to-treat analysis or per-protocol analysis. Cumulative events of depressive episodes during the 12 weeks were six in the melatonin group and four in the placebo group. A significant drop in depressive symptoms were present throughout the study period. No intergroup differences were present in dropouts or adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Melatonin showed no prophylactic antidepressant effect following acute coronary syndrome. The non-significant results might be due to a type II error or melatonin might not be able to prevent development of depressive symptoms following ACS.