Automated feedback modestly improves perioperative treatment adherence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Extensive evidence demonstrates that medical record modernization and a vast amount of available data have not overcome the gap between recommended and delivered care. This study aimed to evaluate the use of clinical decision support (CDS) in conjunction with feedback (post-hoc reporting) to improve PONV medication administration compliance and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) outcomes. DESIGN: Single center, prospective observational study between January 1, 2015, and June 30, 2017. SETTING: Perioperative care at a university-affiliated tertiary care center. PATIENTS: 57,401 adult patients who received general anesthesia in a non-emergency setting. INTERVENTION: A multi-phased intervention that consisted of post-hoc reporting for individual providers by email about PONV occurrences in their patients, followed by directive CDS through preoperative daily case emails that provided therapeutic PONV prophylaxis recommendations based on patients' PONV risk scores. MEASUREMENT: Compliance with PONV medication recommendations, as well as hospital rates of PONV were measured. MAIN RESULT: Over the study period, there was a 5.5% (95% CI, 4.2% to 6.4%; p < 0.001) improvement in the compliance of PONV medication administration along with an 8.7% (95% CI, 7.1% to 10.2%, p < 0.001) reduction in PONV rescue medication administration in the PACU. However, there was no statistically or clinically significant reduction in the prevalence of PONV in the PACU. The prevalence of PONV rescue medication administration decreased during the Intervention Rollout Period (odds ratio 0.95 [per month]; 95% CI, 0.91 to 0.99; p = 0.017), and during the Feedback with CDS Recommendation Period (odds ratio, 0.96 [per month]; 95% CI, 0.94 to 0.99; p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: PONV medication administration compliance modestly improves with CDS in conjunction with post-hoc reporting; however, no improvement in PACU rates of PONV occurred.

ACGME Case Log Reminder Does Not Improve Resident Accuracy in Logging Cases.

To assess competency of residents prior to graduation, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) maintains a case log system, where residents self-report cases they perform. This mechanism results in underreporting of resident involvement in patient care. To determine if an intraoperative case log reminder would increase the frequency of ACGME case logging amongst anesthesiology residents. An intraoperative ACGME case log reminder was implemented on March 13, 2019. The authors collected data for all 53 PGY2-4 anesthesiology residents at the authors' institution from July 14, 2018 to July 16, 2019 from the electronic medical record and ACGME system to calculate the proportion of cases logged and the "lag time" between case occurrence and logging. Data was analyzed for all residents, classes, and individuals. A total of 16,342 anesthetics were performed, and a total of 11,713 cases were logged. The reminder did not improve overall logging rates. Case-logging rates amongst PGY2 residents remained unchanged and declined for PGY3 and PGY4 residents. The lag time between case occurrence and logging increased. An automatic reminder did not improve logging frequency. This may be because residents are unable to log cases intraoperatively in many instances, or they may not feel as though they have participated enough in a case to log it. Additionally, senior residents may log cases less frequently once they have met required case minimums. An automatic case-logging system that transmits resident information directly to the ACGME may be the best way to increase logging accuracy.

Outcomes of sinonasal mucosal melanomas with endoscopic and open resection: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of Sinonasal Mucosal Melanomas (SNMM) treated with endoscopic and open resection. METHODS: A retrospective case review of 20 patients with SNMM treated surgically at UCSF. Kaplan-Meier analyses were calculated to determine outcome differences in endoscopic vs. open resections. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2014, 20 cases of SNMM were confirmed and treated at UCSF. All cases underwent surgical resection, with 10 cases by open resection and 10 cases by endoscopic resection. Using Kaplan-Meier analyses, the open resection group had a 1-year survival of 30% whereas endoscopic resection group was 80% (p = 0.032). Endoscopic resection showed improved survival at all time points after surgery compared to open resection. CONCLUSION: SNMM is a rare and aggressive tumor that is associated with low survival rates. In this small case series, endoscopic resection had improved survival outcomes compared to open resection.

Risk factors for cerebrospinal leak after endoscopic skull base reconstruction with nasoseptal flap.

OBJECTIVE: The use of expanded endonasal surgery (EES) in the treatment of skull base neoplasms has increased significantly in recent years. Since 2006, the nasoseptal flap (NSF) has become the workhorse for the closure of skull base defects involving the anterior and central skull base. We hypothesized that defect site impacts the rate of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak following EES. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING/SUBJECTS/METHODS: Patients who underwent skull base defect repair using a NSF at the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) minimally invasive skull base center were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, disease, and defect location and size were recorded along with the presence of a postoperative CSF leak. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one patients met inclusion criteria. Ten patients had a NSF failure with CSF leakage, 2 in the anterior skull base (frontal sinus, ethmoid, cribriform, planum), and 8 in the central skull base (sella, clivus) (P = .047). Dural defect size ≥2.0 cm(2) in the central skull base strongly correlated with the risk of flap failure (P = .034). CONCLUSIONS: This study of endoscopic closure of skull base defects using a NSF demonstrates there is an association between both surgical site and dural defect size with NSF failure. Expanded defects of the sella and clivus have an increased risk of failure and may warrant augmented techniques.