Efficacy of structured education in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving insulin treatment.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of structured education in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. METHODS: In a 16-week open-label randomized controlled study, 1511 T2DM patients with inadequate responses to two or more oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) for >3 months (HbA1c >7.5%) were randomized (1:1) to either an education group (structured diabetes education plus insulin therapy) or a control group (usual care plus insulin therapy). Both groups discontinued previous OADs (except biguanides and α-glucosidase inhibitors) and started twice daily injections of 30% soluble-70% isophane recombinant insulin. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c from baseline. Efficacy and safety data were analyzed for within- and between-group differences. RESULTS: Of the initial 1511 patients, 1289 completed the study (643 in the control group; 646 in the education group). At the end of the study, significant reductions in HbA1c versus baseline were evident in both groups, but the reduction was greater in the education group (2.16% vs. 2.08%; P < 0.05). A higher proportion of patients in the education group achieved target HbA1c levels <7% (43.81% vs. 36.86%; P < 0.05) and ≤6.5% (28.48% vs. 22.71%; P < 0.05). In addition, patients in the education group showed greater increments in scores and improvement in the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (P < 0.05). The overall incidence of hypoglycemic events was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Structured education can promote the ability of patients to self-manage and their compliance with medications, thereby achieving better outcomes.

Meta analysis of propranolol effects on gastrointestinal hemorrhage in cirrhotic patients.

AIM: To assess the effects of propranolol as compared with placebo on gastrointestinal hemorrhage and total mortality in cirrhotic patients by using meta analysis of 20 published randomized clinical trials. METHODS: A meta analysis of published randomized clinical trials was designed. Published articles were selected for study based on a computerized MEDLINE and a manual search of the bibliographies of relevant articles. Data from 20 relevant studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria were retrieved by means of computerized and manual search. The reported data were extracted on the basis of the intention-to-treat principle, and treatment effects were measured as risk differences between propranolol and placebo. Pooled estimates were computed according to a random-effects model. We evaluated the pooled efficacy of propranolol on the risk of gastrointestinal hemorrhage and the total mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1,859 patients were included in 20 trials, 931 in the propranolol groups and 928 as controls. Among the 652 patients with upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage, 261 patients were treated with propranolol, and 396 patients were treated with placebo or non-treated. Pooled risk differences of gastrointestinal hemorrhage were -18 % [95 % CI, -25 %, -10 %] in all trials, -11 % [95 % CI, -21 %, -1 %] in primary prevention trials, and -25 % [95 % CI, -39 %, -10 %] in secondary prevention trials. A total of 440 patients died, 188 in propranolol groups and 252 in control groups. Pooled risk differences of total death were -7 % [95 % CI, -12 %, -3 %] in all trials, -9 % [95 % CI, -18 %, -1 %] in primary prevention trials, and -5 % [95 % CI, -9 %, -1 %] in secondary prevention trials. CONCLUSION: Propranolol can markedly reduce the risks of both primary and recurrent gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and also the total mortality.