RETRACTED: Straticyte demonstrates prognostic value over oral epithelial dysplasia grade for oral potentially malignant lesion assessment.

OBJECTIVES: Straticyte™ was previously shown to be a more effective prognostic assessment than the current standard of care, histopathological dysplasia grading, to assess progression risk of oral epithelial dysplasia to invasive cancer [Hwang JT, Gu YR, Shen M, Ralhan R, Walfish PG, Pritzker KP, et al. Individualized five-year risk assessment for oral premalignant lesion progression to cancer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;123:374-81]. In this follow-up study, our aim is to confirm the prognostic value of Straticyte using an independent cohort of oral biopsy cases previously assessed as epithelial dysplasia of various grades. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using Visiopharm image analysis system, we analyzed an independent retrospective cohort of 51 oral biopsy samples with known outcomes and a follow-up history of up to 12years, to verify Straticyte, an individualized 5-year risk assessment for progression of oral potentially malignant lesions to invasive squamous cell carcinoma. RESULTS: Straticyte classified the lesions more accurately than histopathological oral epithelial dysplasia grading for risk for progression to cancer over five years. The sensitivity of low-risk vs. non-low-risk Straticyte groups was 100% compared to 68% for mild vs. non-mild dysplasia. The sensitivity of high-risk vs. non-high-risk Straticyte was 71% compared to 3% for severe vs. non-severe dysplasia. Furthermore, the Negative Predictive Value (NPV) for Straticyte was 100% for low-risk vs. non-low-risk, whereas the NPV for mild vs. non-mild dysplasia was 38%. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, Straticyte ascertains as a more useful assessment for risk of cancer progression in oral potentially malignant lesions than oral epithelial dysplasia grade.

Individualized five-year risk assessment for oral premalignant lesion progression to cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The standard of care for premalignant lesion risk assessment is dysplasia grading by histopathology. With significant overlap between dysplasia grades and high inter- and intraobserver variations, histopathology dysplasia grading alone is not a useful prognostic tool. Our aim is to investigate whether a method for quantitatively assessing S100A7, a prognostic biomarker, using image analysis can better predict clinical outcome in cases with oral dysplasia. STUDY DESIGN: Using the Visiopharm image analysis system, we analyzed a cohort of 150 oral biopsy samples to build and test Straticyte, a model for individualized assessment of the 5-year risk of progression of oral precancerous lesions to invasive squamous cell carcinomas. RESULTS: Straticyte classified lesions more accurately than histopathological dysplasia grading for risk to progression to cancer over the following 5 years. The sensitivity of low-risk versus intermediate- and high-risk Straticyte groups was 95% compared to 75% for mild versus moderate and severe dysplasia. Furthermore, the negative predictive value for low-risk versus intermediate- and high-risk Straticyte groups was 78% compared to 59% for mild versus moderate and severe dysplasia. CONCLUSION: By quantitatively assessing S100A7, Straticyte better defines the risk for developing oral squamous cell carcinoma than histopathological dysplasia grading alone.