Patient resources in the therapeutic education of haemophiliacs in France: their skills and roles as defined by consensus of a working group.

The activities of 'expert patients' or 'patient tutors', who help educate their peers, are gaining recognition in the health care system. This study investigates the role played by such patients in therapeutic education programmes organized by caregivers to validate the role of patients in implementing the therapeutic education of haemophilic patients and to define the skills required for such activities. This study employs the consensus methodology recommended by France's National Authority for Health. The working group includes seven caregivers from Hemophiliac Treatment Centers (HTCs) and three patients from the French Association of Hemophiliacs (FAH). The role of patients in haemophilia education is recognized. Patients participating in the education of their peers are referred to as 'patient resources'. A patient resource should be an adult, a volunteer and live in the same region as his peers. Candidates are chosen by the FAH and the HTCs to serve based on their motivation to facilitate the education of other patients as well as on their psychological and pedagogical aptitudes. A patient resource participates in the conception and administration of therapeutic education programmes. He also mediates between the caregivers and the patients. He ensures that the patients understand the material and are able to apply their knowledge in daily life. His activities are governed by professional ethics. Seven categories of skills were defined, permitting the group to determine precisely which skills are required to function as a patient resource. Supervision of the patients is planned to reinforce reflexive practices in the patients. Evolution of the health care system has led patients to become involved in therapeutic education. This phenomenon calls for a framework to be developed and an evaluation of its eventual effects.

[French guidelines. Long-term prophylaxis for severe haemophilia A and B children to prevent haemophiliac arthropathy]. / Prophylaxie de longue durée chez les enfants hémophiles A et B sévères en pévention de l'arthropathie hémophilique.

During the last decades, long-term prophylaxis has become the gold standard for the treatment of children with severe haemophilia A or B. Prophylactic replacement regimens modify the natural history of the disease by aiming at the prevention of haemarthrosis, target joints and arthropathy. This treatment represents a constraint and an enhanced exposure to anti-haemophilic concentrates, which means potential increase of related risks and significant additional cost. The context of crisis of confidence due to the blood borne infections in the 1980s, may have delayed prophylaxis as an universal gold standard.In the early 2000s, the French group CoMETH proposed recommendations based on the review of the international experience. At first, specific guidelines of long-term prophylaxis were dedicated to children with severe haemophilia A or B, aged 3 years or less, with no history of target joint or arthropathy. The main concerns of this regimen consist in the early start and the escalating intensification of the treatment. In the French haemophilia care centres, the diffusion of these guidelines has apparently induced a significant turning point in therapeutic practices for haemophilia children. In 2006, more comprehensive recommendations were diffused to take into account all the children with severe haemophilia, whatever the bleeding history and joint status. The analysis of their impact, jointly with the National cohort "France Coag Network", will first assess the widespread implementation of the recommendations and the observance of the prophylactic regimen and identify factors associated to the compliance.

Factor VIII recovery after a single infusion of recalibrated ReFacto in 14 severe haemophilia A patients.

A recent multicentre collaborative study showed higher estimates of ReFacto potency when assayed with ReFacto Laboratory Standard(TM) (RLS) in comparison when standards consisting of full-length factor VIII (FVIII) were used. The RLS was hence recalibrated, leading to a 20% increase in the amount of ReFacto per vial without change in the labelled potency. The primary objective of this study was to determine the incremental and in vivo recovery of the recalibrated ReFacto in patients with severe haemophilia A. Fourteen male severe haemophilia A patients (FVIII < 1 IU dL(-1)) with a cumulative previous exposure days to any FVIII product >150 were administered an intravenous infusion 50 +/- 5 IU kg(-1) of ReFacto over a 5-min period. Blood samples were collected before infusion and after 15, 30 and 60 min. FVIII clotting activity (FVIII:C) was assessed in a central laboratory by the chromogenic substrate assay. After ReFacto infusion, peak FVIII:C was obtained within 15 min for 10 patients and within 30 min for the remaining four. Mean FVIII:C at peak was 117.7 +/- 17.3 IU dL(-1). Mean incremental recovery was 2.22 +/- 0.27 IU dL(-1) per IU kg(-1) while mean in vivo recovery was 105.9 +/- 14.6%. One patient reported three mild adverse events rated as 'unrelated' to the study drug. FVIII recovery after recalibrated ReFacto infusion falls within the expected range and is similar to the values reported for other FVIII concentrates.

Impact of choice of treatment for bleeding episodes on inhibitor outcome in patients with mild/moderate hemophilia a and inhibitors.

Patients with mild/moderate hemophilia A (MHA) may develop inhibitors to factor VIII (FVIII). In this condition, FVIII clotting activity (FVIII:C) baseline levels may remain stable for some patients, but may be reduced to less than 0.01 U/mL for others. Several risk factors for the development of inhibitors in MHA have been proposed. Genetic factors, such as mutations in the FVIII gene, may play a central role; however, other influences, such as intensive treatment with FVIII products, may also be important. Optimal treatment regimens have yet to be determined, not only for the eradication of inhibitors, but also for the management or surgical prophylaxis of hemorrhages associated with this condition. Several treatment options for the control of bleeding in patients with MHA and inhibitors (MHAI) are currently available, and the choice of therapeutic strategy should be given careful consideration; some treatments may produce an anamnestic response, thus delaying the return to FVIII:C baseline levels and adversely affecting the duration of the severe bleeding phenotype. To increase our knowledge of MHAI, a retrospective collection of data is currently being performed among hemophilia centers in France and Belgium. Based on five examples of patients with MHAI collated from preliminary study data, we illustrate the impact on inhibitor outcome of the therapeutic choices used to treat bleeding episodes in these patients.

Acquired inhibitor to factor VIII in a patient with Hodgkin's disease following treatment with interferon-alpha.

We describe a young woman who developed acquired haemophilia after 18 months of interferon (IFN-)-alpha therapy. This patient had been monitored since 1992 for Hodgkin's disease initially treated by chemotherapy. After two relapses, she received intensive chemotherapy followed by an autologous peripheral progenitor cell graft. IFN-alpha was then administered for 18 months. Bleeding of the limbs and tongue occurred 1 month after withdrawal of IFN-alpha and high titres (123 Bethesda units) of autoantibody to factor VIII (FVIII):C were measured. Prednisone (1 mg kg(-1) day(-1)) achieved rapid cessation of the bleeding and FVIII autoantibodies were undetectable 5 months later. This case report suggests that the activated partial thromboplastin time should be regularly checked in every patient treated with IFN-alpha in cases of unexplained bleeding, together testing for antibodies to FVIII if the bleeding is prolonged.

Incidence of factor IX inhibitor development in severe haemophilia B patients treated with only one brand of high purity plasma derived factor IX concentrate.

Fifteen previously untreated patients (Pups) with severe haemophilia B (factor IX activity < or = 2 U/dl) only treated with one brand of plasma-derived high purity factor IX concentrate (FIX LFB) were studied. Age at first injection varied from 1 to 137 months and follow-up since this first injection from 21 to 86 months (median: 35). Cumulative exposure days (CED) were from 4 to over 100 (median: 26). Among these 15 Pups only one developed an inhibitor. Mutation analysis performed in all patients showed total gene deletion in the patient with inhibitor, partial gene deletion in another one, and missense mutations in 9 families. Mutation was not found in one patient. Actually, according to the data already published, only two patients were at high risk for inhibitor development in our population. Our study, although rather small, confirms the previously reported low incidence of inhibitors in haemophilia B. Large studies on incidence of FIX inhibitors are indeed difficult to perform, due to both the overall small number of severe haemophilia B patients and the low incidence of FIX inhibitors. Consequently, the impact of bias, such as prevalence of different types of gene defects in a given population, is major. Therefore, any study, dealing with incidence of FIX inhibitors in severe haemophilia B should report, for each patient, the type of gene defect.

French previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A after exposure to recombinant factor VIII : incidence of inhibitor and evaluation of immune tolerance.

Fifty French previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A (factor VIII < 1%), treated with only one brand of recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII), were evaluated for inhibitor development, assessment of risk factors and outcome of immune tolerance regimen. The median period on study was 32 months (range 9-74) since the first injection of rFVIII. Fourteen patients (28%) developed an inhibitor, four of whom (8%) with a high titer (> or = 10 BU). All inhibitor patients but one continued to receive rFVIII either for on-demand treatment or for immune tolerance regimen (ITR). Among these patients, inhibitor was transient in 2 (4%), became undetectable in 6 and was still present in 6. The prevalence of inhibitor was 12%. Presence of intron 22 inversion was found to be a risk factor for inhibitor development. Immune tolerance was difficult to achieve in our series despite a follow-up period of 16 to 30 months: immune tolerance was complete in only one out of the 3 patients undergoing low dose ITR and in one out of the 5 patients with high dose ITR.

A cross-over pharmacokinetic study of a double viral inactivated factor IX concentrate (15 nm filtration and SD) compared to a SD factor IX concentrate.

A double blind randomized cross-over multi-center study has been conducted to compare the pharmacokinetic and coagulation activation markers of high-purity factor IX concentrate subjected to both solvent/ detergent (SD) treatment and 15 nm-filtration (FIX-SD-15) with the licensed product subjected only to solvent-detergent (FIX-SD). This filtration process allows the elimination of small particles, such as non-enveloped viruses (i.e., hepatitis A and parvovirus B19). Eleven severe hemophilia B patients (FIX coagulant activity <2 IU/dl) received one infusion of 60 IU/kg of FIX-SD and one infusion of 60 IU/kg of FIX-SD-15 at least at 10 days interval. Blood samples were obtained before and at various time up to 72 h after infusion. The decay curves of factor IX (FIX:C and FIX:Ag) were evaluated by a model independent method. Bioequivalence was found between the two concentrates using the Schuirmann test. The mean FIX:C and FIX:Ag recovery of FIX-SD-15 was 1.08 and 0.89 IU/dl/IU/kg respectively with a mean half-life of 33.3 h for FIX:C and 25.6 h for FIX:Ag. Six months after initial enrollment, pharmacokinetic parameters were similar in the 7 patients tested. There was no significant variation of prothrombin fragment 1+2 and thrombin-antithrombin complexes measured up to 6 h after infusion, indicating that there was no activation process after administration of FIX. In conclusion, these data demonstrate that the introduction of a 15 nm filtration does not alter the pharmacokinetic profile of a well characterized SD FIX concentrate while providing additional viral safety.

The kinetics of antibodies against hepatitis C virus may predict viral clearance in exposed hemophiliacs.

Several studies have reported the spontaneous loss of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies in HCV-exposed persons. However, the relationship between seroreversion and spontaneous virus clearance has yet to be precisely determined in a single homogeneous population of untreated immunocompetent patients. In this study, 32 human immunodeficiency virus-seronegative hemophiliacs who had been exposed to HCV were followed for a mean duration of 141 months; 22 remained chronic carriers (68.8%). All but 1 of the nonviremic patients (90.0%) showed partial (8 cases) or complete (2 cases) seroreversion. In contrast, all but 1 of the viremic patients (95.1%) had a stable serologic profile when analyzed by a recombinant immunoblot assay. The results indicate that any HCV antibody-positive immunocompetent patient with no detectable serum HCV RNA and normal alanine aminotransferase values and whose serial samples show a progressive decrease in the level of HCV antibodies present may be considered as having a resolved infection.

Detection and IgG subclass analysis of antibodies to factor VIII in multitransfused haemophiliacs and healthy individuals.

Using a binding assay to immobilized factor VIII (F VIII) (ELISA) we measured the amount of IgG with binding capacity to FVIII, in the plasma of patients with an inhibitor to F VIII, in multitransfused haemophiliacs without inhibitor and in a control group of blood donors. It was shown that the amount of IgG bound to VIII was elevated in patients with an inhibitor although a weak correlation could be established between the inhibitor titre (BU) and the amount of bound IgG. In all haemophiliacs without inhibitor, IgG bound to F VIII were present. Although the mean value of IgG bound to F VIII was significantly lower than the amount detected in patients with F VIII inhibitors, a group of patients developed an equal amount of IgG recognizing the F VIII molecules to the amount of IgG measured in inhibitor patients. These results indicate that the presence of an inhibitor is not related to the amount of specific IgG bound to F VIII but more likely to the position of epitopes recognized by specific IgG. The presence of IgG bound to F VIII was detected in 92% of control blood donors and an inhibitor to F VIII ranging from 0.5 to 1.3 BU mL(-1) in 17% of them. The isotypes of bound immunoglobins were identified in patients and controls: IgG4 subclass was predominant only in patients with an inhibitor and usually associated with antibodies of one or more of the other subclasses. In noninhibitor patients, very few had antibodies of IgG4 subclass with binding capacity to F VIII. These results raised the question of the clinical significance of these antibodies in multitransfused patients. The study indicates that binding assay is a complementary test to be used in multitransfused patients but cannot be used instead of the coagulation tests for detection of inhibitors.

Incidence of factor VIII inhibitor development in severe hemophilia A patients treated only with one brand of highly purified plasma-derived concentrate.

The incidence of factor VIII inhibitor was studied in a cohort of 56 previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A (factor VIII below 1 U/dl). They received only one brand of highly purified factor VIII concentrate (HPSD-VIII) prepared by conventional chromatography with a solvent-detergent step for viral inactivation. Follow-up since the first infusion of HPSD-VIII was from 1 to 76 months (mean = 29) and cumulative exposure days (CED) from 1 to over 100 (median = 26). Five patients (9%) developed an inhibitor after 6 to 19 CED, only one being a high responder (2%), showing a low incidence of inhibitor compared with previous studies using high purity plasma-derived or recombinant products.

Hepatitis A in French hemophiliacs.

The prevalence of serum antibodies to hepatitis A virus (HAV) in 793 hemophilia A (HA) and 89 hemophilia B (HB) patients coming from 10 French Hemophilia Centers and treated since 1986-1987 with solvent/detergent (SD)-treated products is reported. The results indicated seropositivity to HAV of 29.9% in HA and 40.4% in HB patients. There was no difference among the patients according to severity of the disease, HIV serology or administration of factor VIII during the last 12 months. Seropositivity increased with age from 5.2% in HA children to 42.4% in adults (in HB the respective prevalences in the same groups were 7.7% and 56.1%). When compared to normal controls (n = 585), the prevalence of HAV seropositivity was not excessive in HA patients (n = 206). 19/20 children exclusively treated with a very-high-purity SD-factor VIII concentrate (Centre régional de transfusion sanguine, Lille) remained HAV seronegative. Six cases of HAV contamination were reported in patients with severe HA, probably reflecting the level of HAV endemy in the normal population in France. No special risk of HAV transmission linked to the SD products used in France since 1986 had thus been identified.

[HIV infection among type A and B hemophiliacs]. / Infection VIH chez les hémophiles A et B.

Evolution of HIV infection was studied in 480 hemophiliacs A and 78 hemophiliacs B treated in the "Centre-West" Region. 23.3% hemophiliacs A and 46.1% hemophiliacs B were contaminated by HIV. In this region, HIV seroprevalence in hemophiliacs A was lower than the prevalence noted at the national level (51.2%); this is certainly due to the use of frozen cryoprecipitates in the treatment of a high number of hemophiliacs A. A higher number of hemophiliacs B developed the disease: 12.5% hemophiliacs A versus 22% hemophiliacs B. Moreover hemophilic B patients had a more rapid evolution towards the disease since 6 out of 14 hemophiliacs A and 7 out of 8 hemophiliacs B with AIDS died. The fact that hemophiliacs B were significantly older than hemophiliacs A might be one of the reasons, but it must be noted that the contamination often occurred earlier in hemophiliacs B and was perhaps more important. The more severe evolution in the hemophiliac B group noted in our region is not found in American studies, which may be due to the different ways of preparing Factor IX concentrates in France and the United States.

Prevalence and significance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) viremia in HCV antibody-positive subjects from various populations.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is currently assessed by detection of antibodies to HCV with immunoassays. However, in the absence of an in vitro system to isolate the virus, or an immunoassay to identify HCV antigen in blood, an ongoing acute or chronic HCV infection can be diagnosed only by detection of HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction. We used a reverse transcription-nested polymerase chain reaction to detect an HCV 5' noncoding viral RNA sequence in serum specimens collected from anti-HCV-positive individuals belonging to different risk groups and compared the results with those obtained with a prototype recombinant immunoblot assay (Chiron HCV SIA prototype recombinant immunoblot assay [RIBA]) containing four different viral peptides (c22, c33c, c100, and NS5). The prevalence of HCV viremia ranged from 25.9% in HCV antibody-positive blood donors to 92% in HCV antibody-positive hemophiliacs. Elevated alanine aminotransferase values in HCV antibody-positive patients were clearly associated with viremia. Ninety-six percent of HCV RNA-positive patients reacted to two viral antigens or more, compared with only 64% of HCV RNA-negative patients. Contrary to previous reports, HCV viremia was not associated with either the presence or the absence of a particular antibody specificity. The newly introduced NS5 peptide did not improve the sensitivity or specificity of the RIBA. Although 20% of the patients in our study whose sera reacted to all of the antigens were HCV RNA negative, the positive predictive value of a RIBA considered positive by the manufacturer (two or more bands), was rather high (78%) and may allow suspicion of viremia in EIA2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-positive patients.

Comparison of anti-human and anti-porcine factor VIII inhibitor levels in 63 patients with severe haemophilia A. A French Multicentric Study.

The levels of anti-human and anti-porcine factor VIII inhibitors, measured in 63 severe haemophilia A patients, lay in the ranges of < 0.2-2,600 and < 0.2-1,300 Bethesda units per ml (BU/ml), respectively, with a median cross-reactivity of 33%. In 4 patients, human and porcine inhibitor levels were determined using both plasma, either human or porcine, and factor VIII concentrate, either very high purity human or porcine (Hyate:C). A good correlation between titres was found, whatever the source of factor VIII (plasma or concentrate). The cross-reactivity varies from 0 to over 100%, indicating that the evaluation of both human and porcine inhibitors should be mandatory before any treatment with Hyate:C. Results show that of the 46 patients with human inhibitor of more than 5 BU/ml, 21 (46%) with a low porcine inhibitor (< 5 BU/ml) could benefit from Hyate:C.

[Anti-HCV and recipients: situation in hemophiliacs in 1991]. / Anti-VHC et receveurs: situation chez les hémophiles en 1991.

Sera from 273 French haemophiliacs who had received non viral inactivated concentrates, were tested for antibodies to HCV by first and second generation assays. Antibodies to HCV were detected in 66% of the sera by the first generation assays (anti-C 100-3) reaching 100% by the second generation assays. None of the 53 patients only exposed to solvent-detergent treated Factor VIII or IX concentrates had HCV seroconversion. HCV core protein antibody was always detectable often as a single antibody in seropositive hemophilic patients.

[Efficacy in viral inactivation of the concentrates of factor VIII and IX by the solvent/detergent procedure. Evaluation in patients with hemophilia]. / Efficacité de l'inactivation virale des concentrés de facteur VIII et IX par procédé solvant-détergent. Evaluation chez l'hémophile.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and hepatitis virus B or C (HBV, HCV) transmission are major risks following infusion of coagulation factor concentrates. Thus, several methods have been used to achieve viral inactivation of concentrates prepared from plasma collected from a large number of donors. In this study, 32 patients with haemophilia A or B (n = 31) or von Willebrand's disease (n = 1) were treated between 1987 and 1990 only with factor VIII or IX concentrates inactivated by the solvent-detergent procedure. During this period, none of these cases exhibited elevated liver enzymes (alanine amino transferase), and serological tests for HIV, HBV and HCV infections always remained negative. This suggests that the solvent-detergent procedure of concentrate inactivation is an efficient method to prevent not only HIV or HBV transmission but also HCV infection in haemophiliacs.

Antibody to hepatitis C (anti C 100-3) in French hemophiliacs.

486 patients followed in four French hemophilia centres were tested for antibody to hepatitis C virus C100-3 recombinant protein. On samples collected in 1989, the overall incidence of anti-C 100-3 positivity was 66%. None of the 27 patients only exposed to solvent-detergent treated factor VIII or IX concentrates had C 100-3 antibodies. There was no difference according to the type of hemophilia nor to its severity. Serological follow-up from 1985 to 1989 was carried out on 51 patients. Two third of the C-100 3 paradoxically seronegative patients in 1989 were in fact positive for these antibodies within the last 5 years. They have lost their HCV antibodies as seen with the presently available C 100-3 test. Actually, as the virus has been already present at least for the last 10 years, (on 51 samples collected in 1979, the incidence of C-100-3 positivity was 78%), all treated patients may well have been in contact with HCV.