Evaluación del suplemento de vitaminas C y E en el tratamiento antibiótico contra Helicobacter pylori: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis / Assessment of the use of vitamin C and E supplements concomitantly to antibiotic treatment against Helicobacter pylori: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introducción: La prevalencia de la infección por Helicobacter pylori afecta casi al 50% de la población mundial, siendo un factor de riesgo para enfermedades benignas y malignas gastrointestinales. El aumento de la resistencia al tratamiento antibiótico contra esta infección ha presentado un dilema en el abordaje de otras alternativas en la terapéutica. Objetivo: Determinar la eficacia del suplemento de vitaminasC y E añadido al tratamiento antibiótico en la erradicación de la infección por H. pylori. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática en las bases de datos de MedLine, Embase y Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials (CENTRAL), para estudios que evaluaran la eficacia del suplemento de vitaminasC y/o E en el tratamiento antibiótico de infección por H. pylori. El resultado principal fue erradicación de la infección y el secundario fueron efectos adversos. El metaanálisis fue elaborado mediante el método de efectos aleatorios. Resultados: Se incluyeron 10 estudios y se hicieron 2 grupos. El primero comparó el uso de suplemento de vitaminasC y E incluyendo 973 pacientes, en el cual sin discriminar el número de antibióticos no se obtuvo una relación con la erradicación de la infección (OR: 1,98 [IC95%: 0,92-4,29], p=0,08). La terapia triple o cuádruple antibiótica no tuvo un efecto sobre la erradicación (OR: 1,80 [IC95%: 0,64-5,08], p=0,26, y OR: 2,84 [IC95%: 0,51-15,56], p=0,22, respectivamente). En el grupo en que solo se evaluó el uso de vitaminaC se incluyeron 702pacientes, pero no se obtuvo un efecto sobre la erradicación (OR: 1,17 [IC95%: 0,58-2,31], p=0,65). Los efectos adversos solo fueron reportados en 4 estudios, siendo el más frecuente las náuseas. Conclusiones: El suplemento de vitaminasC y E en la terapia antibiótica contra H. pylori no tuvo ningún efecto. Sin embargo, los estudios presentaron bastantes sesgos y diferencias en la posología de los suplementos y antibióticos

Introduction: Helicobacter pylori infections affect almost 50% of the world population, constituting a risk factor for benign and malignant gastrointestinal diseases. The increased resistance to antibiotic treatment against this infection represents a dilemma in the search of other therapeutic alternatives. Objective: To determine the efficacy of the use of vitaminC and E supplements concomitantly to antibiotic treatment against H. pylori infections. Methods: We performed a systematic review on the MedLine (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials (CENTRAL) databases, searching for studies evaluating the efficacy of vitaminC and/or E supplements in the antibiotic treatment of H. pylori infections. The primary outcome was eradication of the infection. The secondary outcome was the adverse effects. The meta-analysis was conducted using the random effects method. Results: Ten studies were included and analyzed in two groups. The first group, which was comprised by 973patients, compared the use of supplementation with vitaminC and E, showing that, without discriminating the number of antibiotics used, there was no relationship with the eradication of the infection (OR: 1.98 [95%CI: 0.92-4.29] P=.08). The triple or quadruple antibiotic therapy had no effect on eradication rates either (OR 1.80 [95%CI: 0.64-5.08] P=.26 and OR: 2.84 [95%CI: 0.51-15.56] P=.22, respectively). No effect on the eradication rates was observed either in the group that only assessed the use of vitaminC, comprised by 702patients (OR: 1.17 [95%CI: 0.58-2.31] P=.65). Only four studies reported adverse effects, the most common one being nausea. Conclusions: Supplementation with vitaminC and E in the antibiotic treatment against H. pylori has no effect. However, the reviewed studies had several biases and differences in the dosage of the supplements and antibiotics administered

Assessment of the use of vitamin C and E supplements concomitantly to antibiotic treatment against Helicobacter pylori: A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Evaluación del suplemento de vitaminas C y E en el tratamiento antibiótico contra Helicobacter pylori: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis.

INTRODUCTION: Helicobacter pylori infections affect almost 50% of the world population, constituting a risk factor for benign and malignant gastrointestinal diseases. The increased resistance to antibiotic treatment against this infection represents a dilemma in the search of other therapeutic alternatives. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of the use of vitaminC and E supplements concomitantly to antibiotic treatment against H. pylori infections. METHODS: We performed a systematic review on the MedLine (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials (CENTRAL) databases, searching for studies evaluating the efficacy of vitaminC and/or E supplements in the antibiotic treatment of H. pylori infections. The primary outcome was eradication of the infection. The secondary outcome was the adverse effects. The meta-analysis was conducted using the random effects method. RESULTS: Ten studies were included and analyzed in two groups. The first group, which was comprised by 973patients, compared the use of supplementation with vitaminC and E, showing that, without discriminating the number of antibiotics used, there was no relationship with the eradication of the infection (OR: 1.98 [95%CI: 0.92-4.29] P=.08). The triple or quadruple antibiotic therapy had no effect on eradication rates either (OR 1.80 [95%CI: 0.64-5.08] P=.26 and OR: 2.84 [95%CI: 0.51-15.56] P=.22, respectively). No effect on the eradication rates was observed either in the group that only assessed the use of vitaminC, comprised by 702patients (OR: 1.17 [95%CI: 0.58-2.31] P=.65). Only four studies reported adverse effects, the most common one being nausea. CONCLUSIONS: Supplementation with vitaminC and E in the antibiotic treatment against H. pylori has no effect. However, the reviewed studies had several biases and differences in the dosage of the supplements and antibiotics administered.

Tratamiento de la bacteriemia por enterococo resistente a vancomicina con daptomicina versus linezolid: revisión sistemática y metanálisis / Treatment of bacteremia by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus with daptomycin versus linezolid: asystematic review and meta-analysese / Tratamento da bacteriemia por enterococus resistentea vancomicina com daptomicina versus linezolida: revisão sistemática e metanálise

Introducción: Para el tratamiento de las infecciones por Enterococcus resistente a vancomicina (ERV) se emplean fármacos de segunda línea como daptomicina y linezolid. Objetivo: hacer una revisión sistemática para evaluar el tratamiento de la bacteriemia por ERV, con daptomicina o linezolid. Metodología: búsqueda electrónica en las bases de datos de Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, ScienceDirect, CENTRAL, Lilacs y Google Académico, para identificar estudios anteriores a julio de 2015 que hayan comparado los tratamientos con daptomicina o linezolid de pacientes infectados por ERV. Resultados: se incluyeron 15 estudios de 1307 registros. No hubo diferencias entre daptomicina y linezolid con respecto a la mortalidad a 30 días. Con la daptomicina se logró más tempranamente el control microbiológico (OR: 0,64; IC95 %: 0,45-0,92). No hubo diferencias entre los dos antibióticos en cuanto a la mejoría clínica, la necesidad de admisión a la UCI o la aparición de efectos adversos como trombocitopenia, neutropenia e insuficiencia renal. Conclusiones: no encontramos diferencias entre daptomicina y linezolid en cuanto a la mortalidad de pacientes infectados por ERV, aunque con la daptomicina se logró una cura microbiológica más rápida.

Introduction: Second-line drugs such as linezolid and daptomycin are used for treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) infections. Objective: A systematic review to evaluate treatment of VRE bacteremia with linezolid versus daptomycin. Methods: A search was done in the databases of Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, ScienceDirect, CENTRAL, Lilacs and Google Scholar to identify studies comparing treatment with daptomycin or linezolid of patients infected by VRE up to July 2015. Result: Only 15 studies were included of a total of 1.307 records. There were no differences between daptomycin and linezolid with respect to mortality at 30 days. Microbiological cure was better with daptomycin (OR: 0.64; 95 % CI: 0.45-0.92), whereas there was no difference between the two antibiotics with respect to clinical cure, need to ICU admission, and the occurrence of adverse effects such as thrombocytopenia, neutropenia and renal failure. Conclusions: No significant differences were observed between daptomycin and linezolid in reference to mortality of patients infected with VRE, although daptomycin treatment produced a faster microbiological cure.

Introdução: Para o tratamento das infecções por Enterococcusresistente a vancomicina (ERV) se empregam fármacos de segunda linha como daptomicina e linezolida. Objetivo: fazer uma revisão sistemática para avaliar o tratamento da bacteriemia por ERV, com daptomicina o linezolida. Metodologia: busca eletrônica nas bases de dados de Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, ScienceDirect, CENTRAL, Lilacs e Google Acadêmico, para identificar estudos anteriores a julho de 2015 que foram comparados os tratamentos com daptomicina ou linezolida de pacientes infectados por ERV. Resultados: se incluíram 15 estudos de 1.307 registros. Não houve diferenças entre daptomicina e linezolida com respeito à mortalidade a 30 dias. Com a daptomicina se conseguiu mais precoce o controle microbiológico (OR: 0,64; IC95 %: 0,45-0,92). Não houve diferenças entre os dois antibióticos em quanto à melhoria clínica, a necessidade de admissão à UTI ou a aparição de efeitos adversos como trombocitopenia, neutropenia e insuficiência renal. Conclusões: não encontramos diferenças entre daptomicina e linezolida em quanto à mortalidade de pacientes infectados por ERV, embora com a daptomicina se conseguiu uma cura microbiológica mais rápida.