Uterine Tumor Resembling Ovarian Sex-Cord Tumor (UTROSCT): A Rare Polyphenotypic Neoplasm.

Uterine tumor resembling ovarian sex-cord tumor (UTROSCT) is a rare form of uterine mesenchymal neoplasm. Although UTROSCT generally exhibits benign behavior with a favorable prognosis, this neoplasm is nevertheless classified as being of uncertain malignant potential, given its low rate of recurrence and the fact that it rarely produces metastases (e.g., in the lymph nodes, epiploic appendix, omentum, small bowel, subcutaneous tissue, lungs). Its histogenesis is also uncertain. Typically, UTROSCT occurs in peri-menopausal or menopausal women, but it can sometimes be observed in young women. Usually, this neoplasm can be found in the uterine corpus as a nodular intramural lesion, while it is less frequently submucosal, subserosal, or polypoid/intracavitary. UTROSCT can cause abnormal bleeding, pelvic pain, enlarged uterus, and mass sensation, but sometimes it is found purely by chance. This neoplasm can be considered polyphenotypic on morphological, immunohistochemical, and genetic analyses. Generally, upon microscopic examination, UTROSCT shows a predominant pattern of the cords, nests, and trabeculae typical of sex-cord tumors of the ovary, while immunohistochemically it is characterized by a coexpression of epithelial, smooth muscle, and sex-cord markers. The aim of this review is to report clinical and pathological data and genetic alterations to establish their impact on the prognosis and management of patients affected by this rare entity.

Dedifferentiated Endometrial Carcinoma: A Rare Aggressive Neoplasm-Clinical, Morphological and Immunohistochemical Features.

Dedifferentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma is characterised by the coexistence of an undifferentiated carcinoma and a low-grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma. The low-grade component in this subtype of endometrial carcinoma is Grade 1 or 2 according to the Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grading system. The coexistence of low-grade endometrial carcinoma and solid undifferentiated carcinoma can cause diagnostic problems on histological examination. In fact, this combination can often be mistaken for a more common Grade 2 or Grade 3 endometrial carcinoma. Therefore, this subtype of uterine carcinoma can often go under-recognised. An accurate diagnosis of dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma is mandatory because of its poorer prognosis compared to Grade 3 endometrial carcinoma, with a solid undifferentiated component that can amount to as much as 20% of the entire tumour. The aim of this review is to provide clinical, immunohistochemical, and molecular data to aid with making an accurate histological diagnosis and to establish whether there are any findings which could have an impact on the prognosis or therapeutic implications of this rare and aggressive uterine neoplasm.