Association between Ustekinumab Trough Levels, Serum IL-22, and Oncostatin M Levels and Clinical and Biochemical Outcomes in Patients with Crohn's Disease.

Background: Ustekinumab (UST) has demonstrated effectiveness in treating patients with Crohn's disease. Monitoring treatment response can improve disease management and reduce healthcare costs. We investigated whether UST trough levels (TLs), serum IL22, and Oncostatin M (OSM) levels could be early indicators of non-response by analysing their correlation with clinical and biochemical outcomes in CD. Methods: Patients with CD initiating UST treatment from October 2018 to September 2020 were enrolled at six Italian centres for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Clinical and biochemical data were collected at four time points: baseline, second subcutaneous (SC) dose, fourth SC dose, and 52 weeks. TLs were measured during maintenance, at the second SC dose, and at the fourth SC dose. IL-22 and OSM serum levels were assessed at baseline and the second SC dose. We analysed whether TLs, IL22 levels, and OSM serum levels were associated with clinical response, clinical remission, biochemical remission, and endoscopic remission using the appropriate statistical tests. Results: Out of eighty-four initially enrolled patients, five were lost to follow-up, and eleven discontinued the drug before 52 weeks. At the 52-week time point, 47% achieved biochemical remission based on faecal calprotectin levels, and 61.8% achieved clinical remission. TLs at the second SC dose significantly correlated with biochemical remission at the same time point (p = 0.011). However, TLs did not correlate with clinical remission. Baseline OSM levels did not correlate with biochemical or clinical remission or response. IL22 levels notably decreased during UST therapy (p = 0.000), but its values did not correlate with biochemical or clinical remission. Conclusions: UST is an effective therapy for patients with CD. TLs measured at the second SC dose significantly correlated with biochemical remission, emphasising their potential role in treatment monitoring. Levels of OSM and IL-22, despite a significant decrease in the latter during therapy, did not exhibit correlations with clinical or biochemical outcomes in our study. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Key factors for improving adenoma detection rate.

INTRODUCTION: Colonoscopy is a fundamental tool in colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention. Nevertheless, one-fourth of colorectal neoplasms are still missed during colonoscopy, potentially being the main reason for post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC). Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is currently known as the best quality indicator correlating with PCCRC incidence. AREAS COVERED: We performed a literature review in order to summarize evidences investigating key factors affecting ADR: endoscopists education and training, patient management, endoscopic techniques, improved navigation (exposition defect), and enhanced lesions recognition (vision defect) were considered. EXPERT OPINION: 'Traditional' factors, such as split dose bowel preparation, adequate withdrawal time, and right colon second view, held a significant impact on ADR. Several devices and technologies have been developed to promote high-quality colonoscopy, however artificial intelligence may be considered the most promising tool for ADR improvement, provided that endoscopists education and recording are guaranteed.

Serum Levels of PCSK9 Are Increased in Patients With Active Ulcerative Colitis Representing a Potential Biomarker of Disease Activity: A Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND/GOAL: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is characterized by chronic inflammation and progressive course, with potential extraintestinal complications including cardiovascular mortality. Serum proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) levels have been recently recognized as biomarkers of low-grade inflammation and cardiovascular disease. The aim of our study was to evaluate PCSK9 levels in patients with UC and different degrees of disease activity. METHODS: We prospectively recruited consecutive patients with UC attending our center at the University Hospital of Padua. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and biochemical data, including PCSK9, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, and fecal calprotectin, were recorded. Moreover, endoscopic procedures were performed in all subjects. RESULTS: We included 112 patients with UC (mean age=52.62±12.84 y; 52.62% males). Patients with UC and abnormal fecal calprotectin (≥250 µg/g) and/or C-reactive protein (≥3 mg/L) had greater levels of PCSK9 compared with UC patients with normal fecal calprotectin and high sensitivity C-reactive protein ( P =0.03 and 0.005, respectively). Higher endoscopic scores in UC were characterized by greater levels of PCSK9 ( P =0.03). Furthermore, we found a positive correlation between PCSK9 levels and fecal calprotectin ( r =0.18, P =0.04), endoscopic Mayo Score ( r =0.25, P =0.007), and UC-Riley Index ( r =0.22, P =0.01). We also found a positive correlation between PCSK9 levels and both total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values ( P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Serum PCSK9 levels are increased in patients with biochemical and endoscopic evidence of active disease in UC. Further longitudinal studies are necessary to evaluate the role of PCSK9 as a potential biomarker of disease activity and cardiovascular risk in UC.

Incidence comparison of adverse events in patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving different biologic agents: retrospective long-term evaluation.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Current literature is lacking in studies comparing the incidence of adverse events (AEs) in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) treated with adalimumab (ADA) or vedolizumab (VDZ) in a real-life scenario. Therefore, our primary aim was to compare the AEs occurring in patients taking ADA to those of patients taking VDZ. METHODS: In this single center study, data on AEs from IBD patients who underwent treatment with ADA and VDZ were retrospectively collected. AE rates per 100 person-years were calculated. A Cox regression model was used to estimate the hazard ratios of the AEs between the 2 drugs. RESULTS: A total of 16 ADA patients (17.2%) and 11 VDZ patients (7.6%) had AEs causing drug interruption during the study period (P=0.02). Most of the AEs were noninfectious extraintestinal events (50% in ADA and 54.5% in VDZ) while infections accounted for 31.2% of the AEs in patients treated with ADA and 27.3% in those treated with VDZ. The incidence rate of AEs causing withdrawal of therapy was 13.2 per 100 person-years for ADA and 5.3 per 100 person-years for VDZ, corresponding to a 76% lower risk in patients in VDZ. Considering the first year of treatment, we observed 34 subjects treated with ADA (36.5%) having at least 1 AEs and 57 (39.3%) among those taking VDZ (P=0.67). CONCLUSIONS: VDZ has a lower incidence rate of AEs causing withdrawal of treatment compared to ADA but a similar risk of AEs not causing drug interruption. Real-life head-to-head studies are still necessary to further explore the safety profile of these drugs.

Adalimumab biosimilars, ABP501 and SB5, are equally effective and safe as adalimumab originator.

To date, data on effectiveness and safety of Adalimumab (ADA) biosimilars in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are lacking. Therefore, we aimed to verify the ability of ABP501 and SB5 to maintain the clinical and biochemical response induced by the ADA originator, after switching to them. We prospectively analyzed data collected from 55 patients with IBD who switched to ABP501, and 25 patients with IBD who switched to SB5, from ADA originator at four IBD Units between 2018 and 2020. In addition, we included an age and sex-matched control group (n = 38) who continued ADA originator for at least two years and who did not switch to a biosimilar drug. Clinical and biochemical data (C-Reactive Protein (CRP), fecal calprotectin (FC)), concomitant steroid and/or immunosuppressant therapy at the time of the switch and after six months were collected. At six months, in the ABP501 group, we did not observe statistically significant modifications in clinical activity of disease (p = 0.09) and FC values (p = 0.90). Some patients (n = 8) needed to add steroids at six months after switching (p = 0.01), however the need for optimization was not significant between the two timepoints (p = 0.70). Finally, 14.5% patients stopped therapy after six months. Similarly, in the SB5 group we observed a stability of clinical activity and FC values (p = 0.90 and p = 0.20), and a concomitant statistically significant decrease in CRP (p = 0.03). There were no differences in steroids/immunosuppressants need or optimizing biological therapy in this group. Finally, drug survival curves of patients who switched from originator to ABP501 and those who continued ADA originator were similar (p = 0.20). Overall, biosimilar drugs seem to be as effective and safe as the originator. Further larger and longer studies are mandatory to understand the clinical implications of these findings.

Infliximab Originator, Infliximab Biosimilar, and Adalimumab Are More Effective in Crohn's Disease Than Ulcerative Colitis: A Real-Life Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: There are no real-life studies comparing the efficacy and safety of the different antitumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α drugs available in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). To verify the effectiveness and tolerability of different anti-TNF-α agents (infliximab [IFX] originator, biosimilar CTP13, and adalimumab [ADA]) in patients with moderate-to-severe CD and UC. METHODS: Retrospectively, patients with moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease who completed induction with either ADA, IFX originator, or biosimilar from 2015 to 2017 were included. Patients were evaluated after induction at 30 and 52 weeks. We performed an intention-to-treat analysis to evaluate clinical response and remission, steroid-free clinical remission, and endoscopy response according to different time points. At every time point, the need for dose escalation and occurrence of adverse events have been reported. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients with UC (31 ADA, 30 IFX originator, and 28 IFX biosimilar) and 90 patients with CD (30 for each drug groups) were enrolled. After induction at week 30 and 52, clinical response was obtained by the following: 84.3%, 86.5%, and 82% of UC and 93.3%, 88.9%, and 80% of CD. Clinical steroid-free remission rates were significantly higher in the CD group compared with the UC group at every time point (P < 0.05). At week 52, 31.1% of ADA, 16.7% of IFX originator, and 36.2% of biosimilar patients needed treatment optimization. At week 52, 13 patients had suspended therapy because of severe adverse events, including 3 cases of malignant disease. DISCUSSION: Anti-TNF-α treatment was more effective in patients with CD compared to patients with UC, independently of the drug used.