Perinatal Factors Associated With Breastfeeding Trends After Preterm Birth <29 Weeks Gestation: Can We Predict Early Discontinuation?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates and perinatal factors associated with initiation and early discontinuation of breastfeeding among very preterm neonates. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of very preterm infants (<29 weeks gestation) admitted to 2 regional Level III neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019. A national neonatal database was used to evaluate initiation and continuation rates of breastfeeding and associated perinatal factors. Stored nutrition profiles and delivery record books were used to determine feeding volumes associated with continuation of breastfeeding to hospital discharge for a subgroup of infants at a single site. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to present the results between groups, and logistic regression modeling was used to calculate crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI. RESULTS: Of 391 eligible neonates, 84% initiated breastfeeding but only 38% continued to discharge. Interestingly, frequency of breastfeeding initiation (P < 0.001) and continuation (P < 0.001) declined over the study period. After adjustment for confounders, younger maternal age, earlier gestational age, cigarette smoking, and multiparity were significantly associated with early discontinuation of breastfeeding prior to hospital discharge. Early discontinuation of breastfeeding was also related to lower volumes of breastmilk by day 7 of life (P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Very preterm neonates are at high risk for non-initiation and early discontinuation of breastfeeding. The early postnatal period represents a critical time to establish breastmilk volumes, and the identification of key perinatal risk factors allows for early and targeted breastfeeding support.

Returning childbirth to inuit communities in the Canadian Arctic.

While Inuit living in Nunavut have been advocating for decades for the return of birthing to their own communities, over two-third of births continue to occur outside of the territory. We conducted a literature review to answer the question, why has birthplace choice not been given back to Inuit yet. Based on our review we identified a number of factors impacting birthplace choice, including the organisation of the Nunavut medical system that is focused on primary health care and that cannot easily accommodate the potential clinical risks Western health care associates with birthing, often in isolation from socio-cultural risks; staffing vacancies and turn over in Nunavut, which creates challenges in continuity of care and in maintaining trust; and trends in Canada towards the medicalisation of birthing, which resulted in the displacement of traditional midwifery, and lately in the professionalisation of midwifery with training centres mostly located outside of Nunavut. We recognise that providing more options to birth in the north is complex. While birthing in the north as an option is a given objective, operationalising this objective in a consistent manner is likely going to be a challenge for years to come.