Sex and employment status affect patients' perspectives regarding affordability of emergency department visits.

BACKGROUND: For many conditions, a timely visit to the Emergency Department (ED) can have a tremendous impact on the patient's outcome. However, the decision to visit the ED in a time of need can be stressful. Our study aims to understand whether cost was a factor for seeking ED care, and if any particular subgroups including race, ethnicity and sex were less likely to obtain such care. METHODS: A web-based survey of US adults was conducted to assess participants' ED access, estimates of the cost of visiting, and their overall levels of comfort in seeking emergency care. Statistical analyses performed in JMP 16.1 for the Mac. RESULTS: Multivariate regression modeling demonstrated that women (p = 0.0241), participants employed for wages (p = 0.0257), or self-employed (p = 0.0019) are less likely to visit the ED due to cost. Conversely, retired individuals are significantly less likely to encounter cost as a restriction (p = 0.0081). CONCLUSION: In a national survey sample that asked about whether cost was a factor in visiting the emergency department, women and people who worked for wages or were self-employed were most likely to think twice about cost.

Meningovascular Syphilis: A Case of a Young Man Presenting With Acute Stroke and Pulmonary Emboli.

Syphilis is caused by the spirochete Treponema pallidum and classically progresses through a series of stages with increasing symptomatology if unrecognized and untreated. Importantly, central nervous system invasion can occur at any stage, which can lead to variable presentations of neurosyphilis. One such manifestation is meningovascular syphilis, which causes thrombosis of the cerebral vasculature, leading to stroke-like symptoms such as hemiplegia and aphasia. Young, healthy patients may present with these symptoms without any risk factors typically associated with the pathophysiology of cerebrovascular accidents. Further, patients living with HIV who present with stroke-like symptoms should have an even higher suspicion for neurosyphilis as a potential diagnosis. We present a case report of a 31-year-old male with sudden left-sided weakness and numbness who tested positive for both Treponema pallidum and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

Disaster day: a simulation-based competition for educating emergency medicine residents and medical students on disaster medicine.

BACKGROUND: Disaster medicine is a growing field within the specialty of emergency medicine, but educational training typically focuses on hospital drills or other educational strategies, such as didactics, simulation, or tabletop exercises. With the success of gamification in other medical education applications, we sought to investigate if a novel gamified curricular innovation would lead to improved test performance and confidence in the ability to manage a real mass casualty incident (MCI). METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of medical students and emergency medicine residents who participated in a 4-h simulation-based competition consisting of 4 unique stations. Each station had learning objectives associated with the content taught. Learners completed a pre-event survey, followed by participation in the competitive gamification event, and subsequently completed a post-event survey. Differences between pre- and post-event responses were matched and analyzed using paired and unpaired t tests for medical knowledge assessments, the Mann-Whitney U test for perceptions of confidence in the ability to manage an MCI event, and descriptive statistics provided on perceptions of the effectiveness of this educational strategy. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 49 learners with matched (and unmatched) pre- and post-event survey responses. There was a statistically significant increase in medical knowledge assessment scores in both unmatched group means and available matched data (47 to 69%, p < 0.01, and 50 to 69%, p < 0.05). Self-reported confidence in the ability to handle an MCI scenario also significantly increased (p < 0.01). Finally, 100% of respondents indicated they "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that the event was an effective education tool for disaster preparedness and training. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that learners perceived a novel gamification event as an effective educational tool, which led to improved learner knowledge and self-reported confidence in the ability to manage a real MCI.

Gamification of graduate medical education in an emergency medicine residency program.

OBJECTIVES: Our program implemented East EMWars, a year-long, longitudinal game that added competition to our existing curricular content. We surveyed residents to investigate the impact of gamification in emergency medicine residency training. We hypothesized that residents would report higher levels of motivation, engagement, and challenge with gamification compared to traditional didactics. Furthermore, we hypothesized that residents would exhibit generally positive perceptions about gamification as a learning tool and that it would translate to improved performance on the annual in-training examination. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective pre- and post-intervention survey study at a community-based emergency medicine residency program. Given the multiplicity of research questions and inherent nature of educational research, a mixed methods approach was utilized. We utilized nonparametric testing for quantitative data with paired responses pre- and post-intervention. We solicited comments on the post-intervention that were categorized under thematic approach and presented in complete and unedited form in the results. RESULTS: Eighteen (100%) of eligible residents in our program participated in both surveys. There were statistically significant increases in reported levels of motivation, engagement, and challenge with gamification compared to traditional didactic methods. Residents also reported overwhelmingly positive general perceptions about gamification and its broader generalizability and applicability. We did not reach statistical significance in determining if in-training exam scores were associated with our gamification initiative. CONCLUSIONS: This study was a first-of-its-kind look into a longitudinal game in an emergency medicine residency program. Although our results are encouraging, medical educators need further research to determine if this increase in motivation, engagement, and challenge will be associated with an increase in examination scores or, more importantly, healthcare outcomes. Theory-based, broader-scale, prospective studies are needed to further explore and help establish these associations and outcomes.