Spiritual intelligence: a scoping review on the gateway to mental health.

Spiritual Intelligence (SI) is an independent concept from spirituality, a unifying and integrative intelligence that can be trained and developed, allowing people to make use of spirituality to enhance daily interaction and problem solving in a sort of spirituality into action. To comprehensively map and analyze current knowledge on SI and understand its impact on mental health and human interactions, we conducted a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, searching for 'spiritual intelligence' across PubMedCentral, Scopus, WebOfScience, and PsycInfo. Quantitative studies using validated SI instruments and reproducible methodologies, published up to 1 January 2022, were included. Selected references were independently assessed by two reviewers, with any disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Data were extracted using a data extraction tool previously developed and piloted. From this search, a total of 69 manuscripts from 67 studies were included. Most studies (n = 48) were conducted in educational (n = 29) and healthcare (n = 19) settings, with the Spiritual Intelligence Self Report Inventory (SISRI-24) emerging as the predominant instrument for assessing SI (n = 39). Analysis revealed several notable correlations with SI: resilience (n = 7), general, mental, and spiritual health (n = 6), emotional intelligence (n = 5), and favorable social behaviors and communication strategies (n = 5). Conversely, negative correlations were observed with burnout and stress (n = 5), as well as depression and anxiety (n = 5). These findings prompt a discussion regarding the integration of the SI concept into a revised definition of health by the World Health Organization and underscore the significance of SI training as a preventative health measure.

Main findings: This scoping review of Spiritual Intelligence found positive correlations with resilience, general, mental and spiritual health, emotional intelligence, and favourable social behaviours and communication strategies, and negative correlations with burnout, stress, depression, and anxiety.Added knowledge: Spiritual Intelligence is an all-inclusive way to approach spirituality from a practical, daily problem-solving perspective that can be trained with several benefits for personal overall health, while also fostering substantial personal growth in social behaviors and skills.Global health impact for policy and action: Spiritual Intelligence training is urgently needed and should be integrated into global educational programs from early childhood as a health promotion strategy aiming to foster a more resilient and compassionate society.

Management of neonates with 35 weeks of gestational age or more with infectious risk factors at birth: opportunities for improvement.

OBJECTIVES: The Northern California Kaiser-Permanente Neonatal Sepsis Risk Calculator (SRC) has proved to be safe and effective in reducing laboratory tests, hospital admissions, and administration of antibiotics to patients at risk of early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS). Many studies have focused on maternal chorioamnionitis as the principal risk factor for EONS. We wanted to know if the use of the SRC could be equally efficient in the context of several other infectious risk factors (IRF), in addition to chorioamnionitis, such as intrapartum maternal fever, GBS colonization and/or prolonged rupture of membranes (PROM). METHODS: Systematic study of neonates with ≥35 weeks gestational age (GA), born in our tertiary university hospital during a period of 18 months. Patients were retrospectively assessed with the SRC and its recommendations were compared with the actual management. A bivariate analysis of perinatal interventions, and outcomes was performed. RESULTS: A total of 5,885 newborns were born during the study period and 1783 mothers (31%) had at least one IRF. The incidence of culture-proven EONS was 0.5‰. The use of the SRC would have reduced laboratory evaluations (CBC and CRP) from 56.2 to 23.3%, and blood cultures, hospital admissions and antibiotic therapy from 22.9 to 15.5%, 17.8 and 7.6%, respectively. The management based on patients' symptoms would have shown a reduction to 7.5% in all the outcomes of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Both, the SRC and the management based on clinical findings, are safe and efficient to reduce the number of analytical studies, hospital admissions and administration of antibiotics to neonates with IRF.