Economic evaluation and 1-year survival analysis of MARS in patients with alcoholic liver disease.

Objective of this study was to determine 1-year survival, costs and cost-effectiveness of the artificial liver support system Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) and an underlying alcoholic liver disease. In a case-control study, 13 patients treated with MARS were compared to 23 controls of similar age, sex and severity of disease. Inpatient hospital costs data were extracted from patients' files and hospital's internal costing. Patients and treating GPs were contacted, thus determining resource use and survival 1-year after treatment. Mean 1-year survival time in MARS group was 261 days and 148 days in controls. Kaplan-Meier analysis shows advantages of MARS patients (Logrank: P=0.057). Direct medical costs per patient for initial hospital stay and 1-year follow-up from a payer's perspective were Euro 18,792 for MARS patients and Euro 9638 for controls. The costs per life-year gained are Euro 29,719 (time horizon 1 year). From a societal perspective, the numbers are higher (costs per life-year gained: Euro 79,075), mainly because of the fact that there is no regular reimbursement of MARS and therefore intervention costs were not calculated from payer's perspective. A trade-off between medical benefit and higher costs has to be made, but 1-year results suggest an acceptable cost-effectiveness of MARS. Prolonging the time horizon and including indirect costs, which will be done in future research, would probably improve cost-effectiveness.

Economic evaluation of MARS--preliminary results on survival and quality of life.

OBJECTIVES: The short-term medical benefit of the liver dialysis system MARS in patients with severe acute liver disease has clearly been demonstrated. An economic analysis of MARS has not been presented previously. Objective of the study is to calculate the costs per life saved and life year gained and to measure health related quality of life in patients who survived acute liver failure. First results on survival and HRQL are presented here. STUDY DESIGN: Cost effectiveness and cost utility analysis of MARS are performed. All patients since 1993 with chronic liver failure (Bilirubin > 300 micro mol/l) of the university hospital Rostock are included in the original sample (n = 141). Survival data are calculated. Surviving patients were contacted personally, thus quality of life data (EQ 5D and SF12) determined. Patients were compared in case control study design. In a later stage inpatient hospital costs, direct and indirect outpatients costs are included in the analysis. PRELIMINARY RESULTS: MARS-Patients show a higher survival: Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival after 100 days: 0.59 after MARS, 0.39 without (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in health related quality of life (SF12 and EQ-D). Calculations of quality adjusted life years (QALYs) result in 0.116 QALYs gained by treatment of one patient with MARS in one year. DISCUSSION: First preliminary results suggest that 1 year after therapy MARS seems to have a positive effect concerning survival rate, survival time and QALYs gained. Final results of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis will soon be presented.