Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab in Psoriasis Patients Who Failed Anti-IL17: A Two-Year Real-Life Study.

Guselkumab is the first approved human IgG1λ monoclonal antibody selectively targeting the p19 subunit of interleukin (IL)-23. Despite its effectiveness and safety, which have been widely reported by clinical trials and real-life experiences, data regarding its use on patients who previously failed anti-IL17 are limited or characterized by a reduced follow-up period. These data are essential to guide clinicians in biologic switching, considering that anti-IL23 and anti-IL17 partially share their therapeutic targets, as well as some patients who may have to interrupt treatment with anti-IL17 for loss of efficacy over time or the development of adverse events (AEs). In this context, we performed a retrospective study with the aim of evaluating the long-term use (2 years) of guselkumab in psoriasis patients who previously failed at least one anti-IL17 in a real-life setting, also focusing attention on psoriasis located in difficult-to-treat areas (the scalp, palms or soles, fingernails, genitals). A total of 61 patients (35 male, 57.4%; mean age 57.6 ± 8.8 years) were enrolled. Of these, 30 (49.2%) patients failed secukinumab, 21 (34.4%) failed ixekizumab, 7 (11.5%) failed brodalumab, and 3 (4.9%) failed both secukinumab and ixekizumab. At the baseline, the mean PASI and BSA were 12.8 ± 8.4 and 24.5 ± 26.6, respectively. During week 16, PASI90 and PASI100 responses were achieved by 60.7% and 37.7% of patients, respectively, which continued to improve up to week 104 (PASI90: 73.8%, PASI100: 59.0%). Clinical improvement in difficult-to-treat areas was detected as well. In particular, a slower improvement for fingernails and the palmoplantar region was reported compared to scalp and genital psoriasis at week 16. However, no differences were found following 28 weeks of therapy. Primary and secondary inefficacy were reported by 1 (1.6%) and 5 (8.2%) patients. As regards safety, no severe AEs were collected.

Effectiveness of Brodalumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis Located in Difficult-to-Treat Areas.

Background: Recent knowledge of psoriasis pathogenesis has led to the development of selective drugs. Among these, brodalumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin (IL)-17A receptor approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Biologics may be considered in patients with milder diseases in case of active psoriatic arthritis, severe impact on patient's quality of life, and involvement of sensitive and difficult-to-treat areas. These skin locations commonly require systemic drugs. Recently, psoriasis severity monitoring has also changed. Indeed, the clinical evaluation by means of specific efficacy scores was combined with serological evaluation by means of the assay of specific inflammatory biomarkers. Methods: An observational study enrolled patients affected by moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involving difficult-to-treat areas, undergoing treatment with brodalumab to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of brodalumab in patients with psoriasis affecting difficult-to-treat areas (scalp and palmoplantar regions). Secondary outcomes were the assessment of the development of serum markers of inflammation during the treatment period as well as the evaluation of the dermoscopic features of the affected sites to quantify disease activity and response to treatment. Results: Twenty-five patients were included in the study. A statistically significant reduction from baseline in PASI, PSSI, ppPASI and DLQI values as early as week 24 was observed, with further improvement up to week 52. Plasma levels of MMP-3, VEGF-A, and hs-PCR decreased during treatment from week 0 to week 52. Conclusion: Our real-life experience suggests brodalumab as a valuable option for the management of psoriasis located in difficult-to-treat areas. Moreover, our study highlights that the use of brodalumab reduces the plasmatic levels of inflammatory biomarkers (MMP-3, VEGF-A and hs-PCR), showing how the drug modulates the skin inflammatory response by reducing systemic inflammation.

Efficacy and safety of sonidegib for the management of basal cell carcinoma: a drug safety evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: Surgery is the standard management for most of basal cell carcinomas (BBCs). In some cases, also radiotherapy may be a valuable weapon as well as ablative and topical treatments. However, all these approaches may be limited by some tumor features. In this scenario, locally advanced BCCs (laBCC) and metastatic BCC, also defined as 'difficult-to-treat' BCC, remain the real treatment challenge. New knowledge on BCC pathogenesis, particularly the Hedgehog (HH) pathway, led to the development of new selective therapies such as vismodegib and sonidegib. In particular, sonidegib is an orally administered small molecules, which inhibits the HH signaling pathway through the binding to SMO receptor, recently approved for the management of adult patients with laBCC who are not amenable to curative surgery or radiation therapy. AREAS COVERED: The purpose of this review is to analyze and discuss the efficacy and safety of sonidegib for the management of BCC, to provide a broad perspective on the currently available data. EXPERT OPINION: Sonidegib is a valuable weapon for the management of difficult-to-treat BCC. Current data showed promising results in terms of effectiveness and safety. However, more studies are needed to underline its role in BCC management, also considering the presence of vismodegib, and to investigate its use in a long-term period.

Drug survival analysis of dupilumab and cyclosporin in patients with atopic dermatitis: a multicenter study.

Purpose: This study provides a comparative survival analysis between the only two drugs approved in Italy for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD, cyclospoorin, and dupilumab.Materials and methods: A multicenter, retrospective study, was performed to assess drug survival (DS) analysis by comparing cyclosporin (CsA) and dupilumab in 247 AD adult patients. DS was determined through Kaplan Meier survival analysis. For each patient, data regarding age, sex, medical history, and, at every visit, concomitant medications or procedures, adverse events (AEs), and Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) were registered.Results: At week 72, 32/247 patients (13.96%) of the dupilumab group had discontinued the drug after a mean time of treatment of 35.27 ± 11.61 weeks; therefore, the DS rate at W72 was 87.04%. The most frequent (13/32; 40.63%) reason of drug discontinuation was the achievement of complete disease remission after a mean duration of treatment of 42.28 ± 2.02 weeks. In CsA-treated patients, DS rate at W72 was 21.05% (20/95 patients). Sixty-seven out of 95 (70.53%) patients had discontinued the drug, while 8/95 (8.42%) of them were lost to follow-up during the first 12 weeks of treatment. The causes of withdrawal among the patients who stopped CsA were AEs (28/67;41.79%).Conclusions: Dupilumab has a significant longer DS when compared to CsA.