Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Med ; 101(3): 281-90, 1996 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8873490

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To measure the functional status and well-being of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), and compare them with those of a general population group and six disease comparison groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The subjects of the study were patients with CFS (n = 223) from a CFS clinic, a population-based control sample (n = 2,474), and disease comparison groups with hypertension (n = 2,089), congestive heart failure (n = 216), type II diabetes mellitus (n = 163), acute myocardial infarction (n = 107), multiple sclerosis (n = 25), and depression (n = 502). We measured functional status and well-being using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), which is a self-administered questionnaire in which lower scores are indicative of greater impairment. RESULTS: Patients with CFS had far lower mean scores than the general population control subjects on all eight SF-36 scales. They also scored significantly lower than patients in all the disease comparison groups other than depression on virtually all the scales. When compared with patients with depression, they scored significantly lower on all the scales except for scales measuring mental health and role disability due to emotional problems, on which they scored significantly higher. The two SF-36 scales reflecting mental health were not correlated with any of the symptoms of CFS except for irritability and depression. CONCLUSION: Patients with CFS had marked impairment, in comparison with the general population and disease comparison groups. Moreover, the degree and pattern of impairment was different from that seen in patients with depression.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Fadiga Crônica/fisiopatologia , Nível de Saúde , Atividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Transtorno Depressivo/fisiopatologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatologia , Síndrome de Fadiga Crônica/psicologia , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Esclerose Múltipla/fisiopatologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologia , Psicometria , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Am J Med ; 100(1): 56-64, 1996 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8579088

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) currently is defined by a working case definition developed under the leadership of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) based on a consensus among experienced clinicians. We analyzed the experience from one large center to examine the adequacy of the case definition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Predefined clinical and laboratory data were collected prospectively from 369 patients with debilitating fatigue, of whom 281 (76%) met the major criteria of the original CDC case definition for CFS: (1) fatigue of at least 6 months' duration, seriously interfering with the patient's life; and (2) without evidence of various organic or psychiatric illnesses that can produce chronic fatigue. The same clinical data were obtained from 311 healthy control subjects and two comparison groups with diseases that can present in a similar fashion; relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (n = 25) and major depression (n = 19). RESULTS: All of the minor criteria symptoms from the original CDC case definition distinguished patients with debilitating chronic fatigue from healthy control subjects, and many distinguished the patients with chronic fatigue from the comparison groups with multiple sclerosis and depression: myalgias, postexertional malaise, headaches, and a group of infectious-type symptoms (ie, chronic fever and chills, sore throat, swollen glands in the neck or underarm areas). In addition, two other symptoms not currently part of the case definition discriminated the chronic fatigue patients from the control/comparison groups: anorexia and nausea. Physical examination criteria only infrequently contributed to the diagnosis. Patients meeting the CDC major criteria for CFS also met the minor criteria in 91% of cases. CONCLUSION: Patients meeting the major criteria of the current CDC working case definition of CFS reported symptoms that were clearly distinguishable from the experience of healthy control subjects and from disease comparison groups with multiple sclerosis and depression. Eliminating three symptoms (ie, muscle weakness, arthralgias, and sleep disturbance) and adding two others (ie, anorexia and nausea) would appear to strengthen the CDC case definition of CFS.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Fadiga Crônica/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anorexia/diagnóstico , Anorexia/fisiopatologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Transtorno Depressivo/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo/fisiopatologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Fadiga/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Fadiga Crônica/classificação , Síndrome de Fadiga Crônica/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Cefaleia/diagnóstico , Cefaleia/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Infecções/diagnóstico , Infecções/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Esclerose Múltipla/diagnóstico , Esclerose Múltipla/fisiopatologia , Doenças Musculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Musculares/fisiopatologia , Náusea/diagnóstico , Náusea/fisiopatologia , Dor/diagnóstico , Dor/fisiopatologia , Esforço Físico , Estudos Prospectivos , Terminologia como Assunto , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...