Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Br J Surg ; 106(1): 32-45, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30582640

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder cancer is rare, but cancers detected incidentally after cholecystectomy are increasing. The aim of this study was to review the available data for current best practice for optimal management of incidental gallbladder cancer. METHODS: A systematic PubMed search of the English literature to May 2018 was conducted. RESULTS: The search identified 12 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, in addition to several consensus reports, multi-institutional series and national audits. Some 0·25-0·89 per cent of all cholecystectomy specimens had incidental gallbladder cancer on pathological examination. Most patients were staged with pT2 (about half) or pT1 (about one-third) cancers. Patients with cancers confined to the mucosa (T1a or less) had 5-year survival rates of up to 100 per cent after cholecystectomy alone. For cancers invading the muscle layer of the gallbladder wall (T1b or above), reresection is recommended. The type, extent and timing of reresection remain controversial. Observation time may be used for new cross-sectional imaging with CT and MRI. Perforation at initial surgery had a higher risk of disease dissemination. Gallbladder cancers are PET-avid, and PET may detect residual disease and thus prevent unnecessary surgery. Routine laparoscopic staging before reresection is not warranted for all stages. Risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis increases with each T category. The incidence of port-site metastases is about 10 per cent. Routine resection of port sites has no effect on survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy is poorly documented and probably underused. CONCLUSION: Management of incidental gallbladder cancer continues to evolve, with more refined suggestions for subgroups at risk and a selective approach to reresection.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia , Neoplasias da Vesícula Biliar/patologia , Neoplasias da Vesícula Biliar/terapia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Conversão para Cirurgia Aberta/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Achados Incidentais , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Metástase Neoplásica , Inoculação de Neoplasia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/patologia , Prognóstico , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco
2.
NPJ Regen Med ; 2: 13, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29302349

RESUMO

Cancer frequently arises in epithelial tissues subjected to repeated cycles of injury and repair. Improving our understanding of tissue regeneration is, therefore, likely to reveal novel processes with inherent potential for aberration that can lead to carcinoma. These highly conserved regenerative mechanisms are increasingly understood and in the liver are associated with special characteristics that underlie the organ's legendary capacity for restoration of size and function following even severe or chronic injury. The nature of the injury can determine the cellular source of epithelial regeneration and the signalling mechanisms brought to play. These observations are shaping how we understand and experimentally investigate primary liver cancer, in particular cholangiocarcinoma; a highly invasive malignancy of the bile ducts, resistant to chemotherapy and whose pathogenesis has hitherto been poorly understood. Interestingly, signals that drive liver development become activated in the formation of cholangiocarcinoma, such as Notch and Wnt and may be potential future therapeutic targets. In this review, we summarise the work which has led to the current understanding of the cellular source of cholangiocarcinoma, how the tumour recruits, sustains and is educated by its supporting stromal environment, and the tumour-derived signals that drive the progression and invasion of the cancer. With few current treatments of any true efficacy, advances that will improve our understanding of the mechanisms driving this aggressive malignancy are welcome and may help drive therapeutic developments.

3.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 13: 12-4, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26074485

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Mechanical small bowel obstruction is an uncommon but important complication of cholelithiasis. Recurrent gallstone ileus has historically been considered a rare occurrence; however, the incidence is likely to be underreported and the condition carries a high mortality rate. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We present a case in which a 67 year old man suffered a recurrence of gallstone ileus 10 days after his initial enterolithotomy, requiring further laparotomy. DISCUSSION: We review the literature to highlight potential clinical predictors as well as the benefits and pitfalls of management options in preventing repeated episodes of gallstone ileus in the same patient. CONCLUSION: The presence of multifaceted gallstones and multiple stones of size≥2cm on pre-operative imaging should alert the clinician to potential for recurrence.

4.
World J Surg ; 36(1): 104-8, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21964818

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In the new era of revalidation, there is an increasing need to measure surgical outcome objectively. We apply a graphical method, the Variable Life Adjusted Display (VLAD), to esophagogastric resection for malignancy. This technique charts the cumulative difference between expected and actual risk-adjusted mortality over time, allowing observation of performance trends irrespective of case-mix. METHODS: P-POSSUM was applied retrospectively to 182 consecutive patients who underwent resection for esophageal or gastric malignancy in a district general hospital. The primary outcome measured was 30-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients were eligible for inclusion, with a median age of 68 years. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 4.2% compared with 7.1% as predicted by P-POSSUM. The resulting VLAD plot demonstrates an upward trend of better than predicted surgical performance. CONCLUSIONS: VLAD has been hereby applied to esophagogastric surgery and has graphically demonstrated risk-adjusted trends in a single general surgeon's performance. For qualitative comparative purposes, including recertification, VLAD is judged to be a simple, directly interpretable, and useful technique for monitoring surgical performance.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/normas , Gastrectomia/normas , Risco Ajustado/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Competência Clínica , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Esofagectomia/mortalidade , Feminino , Gastrectomia/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Scott Med J ; 54(2): 27-9, 2009 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19530499

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: It has been recommended that carotid endarterectomy should be carried out within fourteen days of the index event if maximum stroke prevention benefit is to be achieved. The aim of this study was to see whether this target was being met in our region and where in the pathway delays occurred. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all patients (n=75) undergoing carotid endarterectomy in 2006 in a regional vascular unit. Eleven patients were excluded as the timing of onset of symptoms was unclear, leaving 64 patients for further analysis. RESULTS: The median time-interval from onset of symptoms to surgery was 47 days (interquartile range 32-65 days). Five of 64 patients (4.5%) had a carotid endarterectomy within 14 days. Median time from onset of symptoms to presentation to health services was one day (IQR 0-7 days), from presentation to health services to neurovascular clinic was 16 days (IQR 10-23 days), from neurovascular clinic to vascular surgery clinic was 13 days (IQR 9-24 days), and from vascular surgery clinic to operation was 13 days (IQR 8-22 days). Fifteen of the 51 patients (29%) attending a neurovascular clinic and five of the 57 patients (9%) attending a vascular surgery clinic were seen within 14 days. CONCLUSION: The fourteen-day target is difficult to achieve due to the number of steps in the referral pathway. This delay may be jeopardising outcome. Reduction in the delay to surgery would require a multi-disciplinary approach and should involve education of the general public.


Assuntos
Amaurose Fugaz/prevenção & controle , Estenose das Carótidas/cirurgia , Endarterectomia das Carótidas , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/prevenção & controle , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Amaurose Fugaz/diagnóstico , Amaurose Fugaz/etiologia , Estenose das Carótidas/complicações , Estenose das Carótidas/diagnóstico , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/diagnóstico , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/etiologia , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escócia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...