Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Neurol ; 23(1): 56-63, 1988 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3278672

RESUMO

In a double-blind controlled trial of 194 patients with clinically definite active multiple sclerosis, 98 were randomized to treatment with cyclosporine (CyA, 5 mg/kg/day), and 96 to treatment with azathioprine (Aza, 2.5 mg/kg/day). Eighty-five patients in the CyA group and 82 in the Aza group completed a treatment period of 24 to 32 months in accordance with the study protocol. No significant differences could be detected between the two treatment groups at the end of the trial. Assessment was done by serial quantitative neurological examinations and Kurtzke's Expanded Disability Status Scale. Frequency of relapse and patient self-evaluation also failed to show significant differences. Overall deterioration observed in both groups during the trial was only minor. The incidence of side effects in the CyA group was more than two times that in the Aza group. We conclude that CyA as a single agent cannot be the drug of final choice in long-term immunosuppressive treatment of relapsing-remitting and relapsing-progressive multiple sclerosis.


Assuntos
Azatioprina/uso terapêutico , Ciclosporinas/uso terapêutico , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Azatioprina/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Ciclosporinas/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esclerose Múltipla/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...