A phase 2 study of three low-dose intensity subcutaneous bortezomib regimens in elderly frail patients with untreated multiple myeloma.

This phase 2 trial evaluated three low-dose intensity subcutaneous bortezomib-based treatments in patients ⩾75 years with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Patients received subcutaneous bortezomib plus oral prednisone (VP, N=51) or VP plus cyclophosphamide (VCP, N=51) or VP plus melphalan (VMP, N=50), followed by bortezomib maintenance, and half of the patients were frail. Response rate was 64% with VP, 67% with VCP and 86% with VMP, and very good partial response rate or better was 26%, 28.5% and 49%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 14.0, 15.2 and 17.1 months, and 2-year OS was 60%, 70% and 76% in VP, VCP, VMP, respectively. At least one drug-related grade ⩾3 non-hematologic adverse event (AE) occurred in 22% of VP, 37% of VCP and 33% of VMP patients; the discontinuation rate for AEs was 12%, 14% and 20%, and the 6-month rate of toxicity-related deaths was 4%, 4% and 8%, respectively. The most common grade ⩾3 AEs included infections (8-20%), and constitutional (10-14%) and cardiovascular events (4-12%); peripheral neuropathy was limited (4-6%). Bortezomib maintenance was effective and feasible. VP, VCP and VMP regimens demonstrated no substantial difference. Yet, toxicity was higher with VMP, suggesting that a two-drug combination followed by maintenance should be preferred in frail patients.

Long-term results of the GIMEMA VEL-03-096 trial in MM patients receiving VTD consolidation after ASCT: MRD kinetics' impact on survival.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based minimal residual disease (MRD) analysis is a useful prognostic tool in multiple myeloma (MM), although its long-term impact still needs to be addressed. This report presents the updated results of the GIMEMA-VEL-03-096 trial. Thirty-nine MM patients receiving bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone after autologous transplantation were monitored for MRD by both nested and real-time quantitative-PCR until relapse. Our data confirm the strong impact of MRD on survival: overall survival was 72% at 8 years median follow-up for patients in major MRD response versus 48% for those experiencing MRD persistence (P=0.041). In addition, MRD kinetics resulted predictive for relapse: indeed median remission duration was not reached for patients in major MRD response, 38 months for those experiencing MRD reappearance and 9 months for patients with MRD persistence (P<0.001). Moreover: (1) 26 patients achieving major MRD response (67%) benefit of excellent disease control (median TNT: 42 months); (2) MRD reappearance heralds relapse, with a TNT comparable to that of MRD persistence (9 versus 10 months, P=0.706); (3) the median lag between MRD reappearance and need for salvage treatment is 9 months. These results suggest the usefulness of a long-term MRD monitoring in MM patients and the need for maintenance or pre-emptive treatments ensuring durable responses.

Lenalidomide-prednisone induction followed by lenalidomide-melphalan-prednisone consolidation and lenalidomide-prednisone maintenance in newly diagnosed elderly unfit myeloma patients.

This multicenter phase II trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide-prednisone (RP) induction, followed by lenalidomide-melphalan-prednisone (MPR) consolidation and RP maintenance in elderly unfit newly diagnosed myeloma patients. Patients received four 28-day RP induction courses (lenalidomide 25 mg/day on days 1-21 and prednisone 50 mg three times/week), followed by six 28-day MPR consolidation cycles (melphalan 2 mg, prednisone 50 mg three times/week and lenalidomide 10-15 mg/day on days 1-21), and maintenance with lenalidomide (10 mg/day on days 1-21 every 28 days) plus prednisone (25 mg three times/week). Forty-six patients were enrolled. Median age was 75 years, 59% of patients had at least one comorbidity and 35% at least two. Partial response rate was 80%, including 29% very good partial response. Median time to progression was 19.6 months, median progression-free survival was 18.4 months and 2-year overall survival was 80%. At the tolerated consolidation dose (melphalan 25 mg/month and lenalidomide 10 mg/day), the most frequent grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia (36.4%), anemia (12.1%), cutaneous reactions (18.2%) and infections (12.1%). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 12.1% of patients. In conclusion, RP induction followed by MPR consolidation and RP maintenance showed a manageable safety profile, and reduced the risk of severe hematological toxicity in unfit elderly myeloma patients.

Previous thalidomide therapy may not affect lenalidomide response and outcome in relapse or refractory multiple myeloma patients.

INTRODUCTION: Lenalidomide is a thalidomide analogue, designed to have improved efficacy and tolerability over the parent drug. The aim of this retrospective analysis is to evaluate the impact of thalidomide therapy on lenalidomide response and outcome in relapse or refractory multiple myeloma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 106 relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients received lenalidomide 25mg plus dexamethasone as salvage therapy; 80 patients progressed on thalidomide treatment (thalidomide-resistant) and 26 patients discontinued thalidomide in at least partial remission (thalidomide-sensitive). Median time from diagnosis to lenalidomide treatment was 57 months. Median prior lines of therapies were 3, range 1-6. 62% of patients were previously treated with autologous stem cell transplantation, and 71% with bortezomib-based regimens. RESULTS: In the thalidomide-resistant and -sensitive groups, the at least partial response rates were 56.2% and 61.5% (P = .45), including at least VGPR rates of 16.2% and 11.5%; the median progression free survival was 10 and 12 months (P=.12) and the median overall survival was 17 and 18.5 months (P = .50), respectively. CONCLUSION: Lenalidomide may be equally effective in heavily pre-treated multiple myeloma patients who are thalidomide-resistant or thalidomide-sensitive to a previous therapy.

Isochromosome 6p and deletion of 6q characterize two related cytogenetic clones in a patient with immunoblastic lymphoma.

In a case of immunoblastic lymphoma we observed the presence of either a deletion of the long arm of chromosome 6 or of an isochromosome, i(6p), which occurred alternatively in metaphase cells. This suggests a selective pressure for loss of heterozygosity of genes located on 6q and is in accordance with the hypothesis that one or more tumor suppressor genes might be located on the long arm chromosome 6.

Analysis of the p53 gene in myeloid malignancies associated with chromosomal abnormalities involving the short arm of chromosome 17.

p53 protein is encoded by a tumor-suppressor gene located on the short arm of chromosome 17. We looked for mutations or rearrangements of the p53 gene in five patients with acute transformation of a chronic myeloproliferative disorder and cytogenetic anomalies involving the short arm of chromosome 17. Two patients had a isochromosome i(17q); three more patients showed the presence of unbalanced translocations involving chromosome 17. One of these patients had a single base pair deletion, causing a frameshift mutation, in the exon 5 of the p53 gene. The karyotype of this patient showed a translocation t(5;17)(q11;p11), with loss of a normal homologue of both chromosomes 5 and 17. In all other cases the configuration of the p53 gene, as tested by PCR-SSCP analysis of exons 5 to 9 and Southern blot, was normal. Our data suggest that mutations of the p53 gene occur in a minority of hemopoietic malignancies characterized by monosomy for the short arm of chromosome 17. However, the unbalanced translocation t(5q;17p) could be a chromosomal abnormality specifically associated with loss of function of the p53 gene.