Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Asian J Androl ; 24(2): 195-200, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34916475

RESUMO

The goal of this study was to investigate the clinical application of free/total prostate-specific antigen (F/T PSA) ratio, considering the new broad serum total PSA (T-PSA) "gray zone" of 2.0-25.0 ng ml-1 in differential diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) and benign prostate diseases (BPD) in men over 50 years in Western China. A total of 1655 patients were included, 528 with PCa and 1127 with BPD. Serum T-PSA, free PSA (F-PSA), and F/T PSA ratio were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the efficiency of PSA and F/T PSA ratio. There were 47.4% of cancer patients with T-PSA of 2.0-25.0 ng ml-1. When T-PSA was 2.0-4.0 ng ml-1, 4.0-10.0 ng ml-1, and 10.0-25.0 ng ml-1, the area under the curve (AUC) of F/T PSA ratio was 0.749, 0.769, and 0.761, respectively. The best AUC of F/T PSA ratio was 0.811 when T-PSA was 2.0-25.0 ng ml-1, with a specificity of 0.732, a sensitivity of 0.788, and an optimal cutoff value of 15.5%. The AUC of F/T PSA ratio in different age groups (50-59 years, 60-69 years, 70-79 years, and ≥80 years) was 0.767, 0.806, 0.815, and 0.833, respectively, and the best sensitivity (0.857) and specificity (0.802) were observed in patients over 80 years. The T-PSA trend was in accordance with the Gleason score, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage, and American Joint Committee on Cancer prognosis group. Therefore, the F/T PSA ratio can facilitate the differential diagnosis of PCa and BPD in the broad T-PSA "gray zone". Serum T-PSA can be a Gleason score and prognostic indicator.


Assuntos
Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias da Próstata , Área Sob a Curva , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Curva ROC , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
2.
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban ; 49(6): 924-928, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32677406

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To explore the interference of exogenous insulin therapy on insulin detection test by electrochemical luminescence immunoassay (ECLIA). METHODS: Insulin level was determined by ECLIA. According to the requirements of EP7-A2 of American Society for Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute Standards, paired difference experiment was conducted to evaluate the interference of 8 kinds of exogenous insulin on insulin detection, dose effect experiment was conducted to determine the relationship between exogenous insulin concentration and interference degree. RESULTS: When the interfering substance concentrations were ≤250 µU/mL, Gansulin NⓇ, Gansulin RⓇ, Humulin RⓇ,Novolin RⓇ and LantusⓇ all showed linear positive interference, while LevemirⓇ showed a linear negative interference in high concentrations insulin and non-interfering in low concentrations insulin, HumalogⓇ and Novo RapidⓇ showed non-interference in insulin detection. CONCLUSIONS: The use of different exogenous insulin may have different interference on insulin measurement, which need laboratorians and physicians notice to avoid misdiagnosis.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...