Values for the Digestibility of Pea Protein Isolate or Casein Amino Acids Determined using the Dual Isotope Method Are Not Similar to Those Derived with the Standard Ileal Balance Method in Healthy Volunteers.

BACKGROUND: The measurement of ileal amino acid (AA) digestibility is invasive and inappropriate when applied to vulnerable populations. The dual isotope method has been developed over the past 5 y as an alternative method. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to compare the indispensable amino acid (IAA) digestibility values of 2 different proteins obtained using the dual isotope and the standard ileal balance methods in the same subjects. METHODS: Fifteen healthy adults completed the study. Over 4 h, they ingested 9 successive portions of mashed potatoes containing the test protein (pea protein or casein) labeled intrinsically with 15N and 2H, and a 13C-free AA mixture as a reference for the dual isotope method. Plasma was sampled regularly over the 8-h postprandial period, whereas the ileal digesta was collected continuously via a naso-ileal tube. Isotopic enrichments (15N and 13C) were measured in the digesta for the direct determination of ileal IAA digestibility, whereas plasma enrichments (2H and 13C) were measured to determine IAA digestibility using the dual isotope method. RESULTS: The 4-h repeated meal procedure enabled the almost complete digestion of test proteins at 8 h and the attainment of a plasma isotopic plateau between 2.5 and 4 h. These conditions were necessary to perform the ileal balance and dual isotope methods simultaneously. For pea protein, the mean IAA digestibility was similar between the 2 methods, but significant differences (from 10% to 20%) were observed for individual IAA values. For casein, IAA digestibility was significantly lower with the dual isotope method for all the IAA analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Under our experimental conditions, the degree of agreement between the dual isotope and ileal balance methods varied among AAs and depended on the protein source. Further research is needed to validate the dual isotope method. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04072770.

Caecal digestibility as an approximation of ileal protein digestibility evaluation in rats.

The rat model can be used to assess ileal protein digestibility rapidly and in first intention, but no standardised method exists. Our objective was to compare methods to assess protein digestibility, depending on collection site (ileum/caecum) and use of a non-absorbable marker. A meal containing either casein, gluten or pea protein and chromium oxide as non-absorbable marker was given to male Wistar rats and the entire digestive content was collected 6 h later. Total chromium recovery was incomplete and variable, depending on protein source. We observed no significant difference in digestibility between the methods for any of the protein sources tested. Although none of the methods tested is optimal, our results suggest that caecal digestibility can be used as a proxy of ileal digestibility in rats without using a non-absorbable marker. This simple method makes it possible to evaluate protein digestibility of new alternative protein sources for human consumption.

Real ileal amino acid digestibility of pea protein compared to casein in healthy humans: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: It is necessary to propose plant alternatives to animal proteins that are of good nutritional quality. Pea is a good candidate owing to its high protein content and its well-balanced amino acid (AA) profile. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the real ileal AA and nitrogen digestibility (RIDAA and RIDN) of pea protein isolate as compared to milk casein in humans. It also aimed to evaluate their nutritional quality through calculation of the digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) and to determine the net postprandial protein utilization (NPPU). METHODS: Fifteen healthy volunteers were included in a randomized, single-blinded, 2-arm, parallel-design trial. They were equipped with a naso-ileal tube. They ingested the test meals, which consisted of 9 successive portions of mashed potatoes containing either pea protein or casein, intrinsically labeled with nitrogen 15. Ileal content, plasma, and urine samples were collected regularly over an 8-h postprandial period. RESULTS: The mean RIDAA values were 93.6% ± 2.9% for pea protein and 96.8% ± 1.0% for casein, with no difference between the sources (P = 0.22). Leucine, valine, lysine, and phenylalanine were significantly less digestible in pea than in casein. The RIDN values were 92.0% ± 2.7% and 94.0% ± 1.7% for pea protein and casein, respectively, and were not different (P = 0.11). The DIAAS was 1.00 for pea protein and 1.45 for casein. The NPPU was 71.6% ± 6.2% and 71.2% ± 4.9% for pea protein and casein, respectively (P = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Although some AAs are less digestible in pea protein than in casein, the real ileal digestibility and the NPPU were not different. The DIAAS of 1.00 obtained for pea protein demonstrated its ability to meet all AA requirements. This study shows the potential of pea isolate as a high-quality protein. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04072770.

Multi-criteria assessment of pea protein quality in rats: a comparison between casein, gluten and pea protein alone or supplemented with methionine.

The objective of this study was to assess the nutritional quality of pea protein isolate in rats and to evaluate the impact of methionine (Met) supplementation. Several protein diets were studied: pea protein, casein, gluten, pea protein-gluten combination and pea protein supplemented with Met. Study 1: Young male Wistar rats (n 8/group) were fed the test diets ad libitum for 28 d. The protein efficiency ratio (PER) was measured. Study 2: Adult male Wistar rats (n 9/group) were fed the test diets for 10 d. A protein-free diet group was used to determine endogenous losses of N. The rats were placed in metabolism cages for 3 d to assess N balance, true faecal N digestibility and to calculate the Protein Digestible-Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS). They were then given a calibrated meal and euthanised 6 h later for collection of digestive contents. The true caecal amino acid (AA) digestibility was determined, and the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS) was calculated. Met supplementation increased the PER of pea protein (2·52 v. 1·14, P < 0·001) up to the PER of casein (2·55). Mean true caecal AA digestibility was 94 % for pea protein. The DIAAS was 0·88 for pea protein and 1·10 with Met supplementation, 1·29 for casein and 0·25 for gluten. Pea protein was highly digestible in rats under our experimental conditions, and Met supplementation enabled generation of a mixture that had a protein quality that was not different from that of casein.

Maternal High-Protein Diet during Pregnancy Modifies Rat Offspring Body Weight and Insulin Signalling but Not Macronutrient Preference in Adulthood.

Diet of mothers during gestation may impact offspring phenotype. This study evaluated the consequences of a maternal High-Protein (HP) diet during gestation on food preferences and phenotypic characteristics in adult rat offspring. Dams were fed a HP or a Normal-Protein (NP) isocaloric diet during gestation only. Weaned female pups were divided into 3 diet groups: NP control or one of two dietary self-selection (DSS) conditions. In DSS1, offspring had a free choice between proteins (100%) or a mix of carbohydrates (88%) and lipids (12%). In DSS2, the choice was between proteins (100%), carbohydrate (100%) or lipids (100%). DSS2 groups consumed more of their energy from protein and lipids, with a decreased carbohydrate intake (p < 0.0001) compared to NP groups, regardless of the maternal diet. Offspring from HP gestation dams fed the DSS2 diet (HPDSS2) had a 41.2% increase of total adiposity compared to NPDSS2 (p < 0.03). Liver Insulin receptor and Insulin substrate receptor 1 expression was decreased in offspring from HP compared to NP gestation dams. These results showed the specific effects of DSS and maternal diet and data suggested that adult, female offspring exposed to a maternal HP diet during foetal life were more prone to adiposity development, in response to postweaning food conditions.