Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 235: 6-12, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30771718

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Despite the benefits of concomitant radiotherapy and cisplatin for locally advanced cervical cancer, recurrence rates remain high. New treatment strategies such as consolidation chemotherapy and different concomitant chemotherapy combinations have been tested in recent years. Identification of the best candidates for each treatment strategy could optimize results. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of data from 127 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stages IIB-IVA), treated at a single institution from 2005 to 2014. Risk factors for loco-regional and systemic recurrence, and prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were analysed using Cox regression. Survival of patients treated with consolidation chemotherapy was compared with survival of patients not treated with consolidation chemotherapy in the role cohort and in a propensity-score-matched cohort. RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 48.7 months, loco-regional-recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant-metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and OS at 5 years were 76.6%, 54.0% and 63.0%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, tumour size ≥6 cm was associated with shorter LRFS [hazard ratio (HR) 5.18; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45-18.45; p = 0.011], and adenocarcinoma (HR 2.48; 95% CI 1.10-5.57; p = 0.028) and positive lymph nodes (HR 2.21; 95% CI 1.303-4.72; p = 0.041) were associated with shorter DMFS. Tumour size ≥6 cm was associated with shorter OS (HR 2.64; 95% CI 1.09-6.35; p = 0.031). Twenty-two patients were treated with consolidation chemotherapy; on univariate analysis, these patients had longer OS compared with patients who were not treated with consolidation chemotherapy (p = 0.043). In a propensity-score-matched cohort, patients treated with consolidation chemotherapy had longer DMFS and OS compared with patients who were not treated with consolidation chemotherapy, although the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Different risk factors are associated with loco-regional and distant metastases in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, and could potentially lead to particular therapeutic strategies. Although the number of patients treated with consolidation chemotherapy in the study cohort was small, they seemed to live longer and to have better control of distant relapse then patients who were not treated with consolidation chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/etiologia , Neoplasias Pélvicas/secundário , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Quimiorradioterapia/mortalidade , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Terapia Combinada , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pélvicas/mortalidade , Pelve/patologia , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidade , Adulto Jovem
2.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 26(3): 449-55, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26825830

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) is an option for treating patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Three ongoing randomized trials are comparing SCS plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone, and few comparative studies have been published. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of data on 209 patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma who were treated at a single institution from 2000 to 2013. We analyzed prognostic factors in the recurrence setting to determine the value of SCS in a multivariate model, including propensity score, by prognostic group. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, younger than 65 years, personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer, stage I-II at diagnosis, residual disease 10 mm or less after primary debulking surgery, performance status 1 or less, CA125 less than 100, only 1 metastatic site of recurrence, platinum-free interval of more than 12 months, and SCS correlated with better overall survival. In the multivariate model, including propensity score, SCS remained associated with a 66% decrease in the risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15-0.76, P = 0.008). Secondary cytoreductive surgery was also linked to longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.30-0.84, P = 0.008). There was no evidence of a benefit of SCS in patients with unfavorable prognosis (P for interaction = 0.654). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the benefit of SCS in progression-free survival and overall survival in the recurrent setting and suggest that it exists not only for patients with a good prognosis.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Neoplasia Residual/cirurgia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Terapia Combinada , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/tratamento farmacológico , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/patologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasia Residual/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasia Residual/patologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...