Neurodevelopment and Health-Related Quality of Life in Infants Born with Gastroschisis: A 6-Year Retrospective French Study.

Introduction Quantify quality of life (QoL) outcomes in gastroschisis children is little assessed. The primary objective was to describe the long-term outcome of newborns with gastroschisis treated in three tertiary care hospitals of France in terms of neurodevelopment and QoL. Materials and Methods The study reported was a cross-sectional, descriptive multicentric retrospective study assessing the outcome of newborns with gastroschisis, born between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2014, treated at two large and French level III neonatal intensive care units. Long-term outcome data were assessed by questionnaires sent to the infants' parents. Questionnaires explored global health, neurological development, and quality of life (overall assessment including socio-economic and medical), Age & Stages Questionnaire, infants' quality of life (KIDSCREEN), and quality of parents' life (General Questionnaire Short Form-36). Results In this study, 50% of the survivor's families answered the assessment form (n = 33). The average follow-up age was 40 months, ranging from 8 months to 6 years. Cases of simple gastroschisis more often had a normal score for "communication" (p = 0.033), while patients who received morphine for a longer duration had significantly lower scores for the items "communication" and "problem resolving" (p = 0.024 and p = 0.011, respectively). Children's QoL was significantly lower for patients with gestational age younger than 36 weeks (p = 0.023) and for patients born following "fetal cause delivery" (p = 0.022). Parents had a significantly higher physical composite score if their child underwent primary closure (p = 0.012). Conclusion Our analyses confirm the idea that cases of complex gastroschisis and preterm delivery may lead to poorer outcome. Such hindsight (40 months in mean) allowed for an interesting assessment of development long after the patient's initial hospitalization and to confirm these results, a standardized neuropsychological evaluation of patients should be done when at least 6 years old. An accurate assessment of the social environment and its impact on the development and QoL of children will be fundamental to avoid selection bias.

Management and outcome challenges in newborns with gastroschisis: A 6-year retrospective French study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the gestational age (GA) at which risk of mortality and severe outcome was minimized comparing preterm delivery and expectant management. METHODS: Retrospective study performed between 2009 and 2014 of newborns with gastroschisis in three large French level III neonatal intensive care units. Each department followed two distinct strategies: elective delivery at 35 weeks' GA and a delayed approach. RESULTS: We included 69 gastroschisis cases. The lengths of stay lasting more than 60 days were significantly greater in the planned delivery group than in the expectant approach group (18/30 (60%) vs. 8/39 (20.5%), p = 0.001). Gastroschisis cases receiving antenatal corticoids during the last two weeks of gestation required significantly less surgeries during their initial stay (p = 0.003) as well as shorter parenteral feedings (p = 0.002). A multivariate logistic regression showed that a GA of less than 36 weeks' GA was is a pejorative factor for a stay above 60 days, regardless of whether it was a simple or complex gastroschisis, (OR= 3.8; p = 0.021). A complex gastroschisis was a risk factor for significantly longer parenteral feedings, regardless of the center where patient is treated (Beta = -0.3, p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Future research should focus on decisions about delivery timing by incorporating risk of neonatal morbidity.