The Impact of Obesity on Operative Results and Postoperative Courses in Laparoscopic-assisted Distal Gastrectomy (LADG)

PURPOSE: Despite known advantages of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) over open surgery, including less blood loss, less pain, faster recovery, and shorter hospital stays, many surgeons still hesitate to perform LADG in overweight patients due to concerns about increased perioperative morbidity. We investigated whether surgical outcomes in LADG differ in overweight patients and normal patients, as well as the influence of surgical experience. METHODS: Between April 2004 and December 2006, 331 consecutive patients underwent LADG for preoperatively diagnosed early gastric cancer. Using the definition of overweight by western criteria, patients were classified into a low (n = 187, BMI 25 kg/m(2)) group. We retrospectively analyzed surgical outcomes, including operation time, retrieved lymph nodes, hospital courses, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The only differences in overweight and normal patients were longer operation time, incision length, and fewer retrieved lymph nodes. As our surgical team accumulated experience (after 250 cases in our study), there were no differences at all between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Technical difficulty in overweight patients could hamper some surgical outcomes but didn't worsen the post- operative courses or complications. Moreover, those difficulties can be overcome as the surgical team accumulates experience.

Laparoscopic Assisted Total Gastrectomy (LATG) with Extracorporeal Anastomosis and using Circular Stapler for Middle or Upper Early Gastric Carcinoma: Reviews of Single Surgeon's Experience of 48 Consecutive Patients

PURPOSE: Many recent studies have reported on the feasibility and usefulness of laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for treating early gastric cancer. On the other hand, there has been few reports about laparoscopy assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) because upper located gastric cancer is relatively rare and the surgical technique is more difficult than that for LADG, We now present our procedure and results of performingLATG for the gastric cancer located in the upper or middle portion of the stomach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From Jan 2005 to Sep 2007, 96 patients underwent LATG by four surgeons at the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. Among them, 48 consecutive patients who were operated on by asingle surgeon were analyzed with respect to the clinicopathological features, the surgical results and the postoperative courses with using the prospectively collected laparoscopy surgery data. RESULTS: There was no conversion to open surgery during LATG. For all the reconstructions, Roux-en Y esophago- jejunostomy and D1+beta lymphadenectomy were the standard procedures. The mean operation time was 212+/-67 minutes. The mean total number of retrieved lymph nodes was 28.9+/-10.54 (range: 12~64) and all the patients had a clear proximal resection margin in their final pathologic reports. The mean time to passing gas, first oral feeding and discharge from the hospital was 2.98, 3.67 and 7.08 days, respectively. There were 5 surgical complications and 2 non-surgical complications for 5 (10.4%) patients, and there was no mortality. None of the patients needed operation because of complications and they recovered with conservative treatments. The mean operation time remained constant after 20 cases and so a learning curve was present. The morbidity rate was not different between the two periods, but the postoperative course was significantly better after the learning curve. Analysis of the factors contributing to the postoperative morbidity, with using logistic regression analysis, showed that the BMI is the only contributing factor forpostoperative complications (P=0.029, HR=2.513, 95% CI=1.097-5.755). Conclusions: LATG with regional lymph node dissection for upper and middle early gastric cancer is considered to be a safe, feasible method that showed an excellent postoperative course and acceptable morbidity. BMI should be considered in the patient selection at the beginning period because of the impact of the BMI on the postoperative morbidity.

Comparison of Reconstruction Methods after Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma in Terms of the Long Term Physiologic Function and Nutritional Status; Billroth I Gastroduodenostomy versus Roux-en Y Gastrojejunostomy

PURPOSE: The only curative treatment for gastric carcinoma is surgery and it is still under debate which reconstruction method is better after performing gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. The typical reconstruction methods after distal gastrectomy are Billroth I, Billroth II and Roux-en Y reconstruction. Yet it is difficult to compare these methods and not so much is known about which reconstruction is better in terms of the physiologic and nutritional function. With this background, we compared two reconstruction methods after distal gastrectomy (Billroth I versus Roux-en Y reconstruction) in terms of the long term physiologic function and nutritional status to create a reference for selecting reconstruction methods after distal gastrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1999 and 2002, 663 patients who underwent distal gastrectomy for early gastric carcinoma filled out questionnaires every six months after operation, and these questionnaires evaluated the physiologic function. To evaluate their nutritional status, blood tests were performed every six months to check their albumin, protein and hemoglobin levels, and we checked the body weight every 6 months as well. RESULTS: The total score of the 15 questions on the questionnaire concerned with the physiologic function showed no difference between the two groups at every evaluation time, and both groups showed very low total scores, indicating tolerable physiologic function after operation. When comparing each question between two the groups, only symptoms of regurgitation and food passage showed a difference between the two groups, showing that the Roux-en Y group had better function in terms of these two symptoms. The Billroth I group showed a better nutrition status, indicating that the level of albumin, protein and hemoglobin were higher in the Billroth I group, with statistical significance. Body weight loss was severe in the Roux-en Y group. CONCLUSION: The physiologic function is slightly better in the Roux-en Y group in terms of some symptoms such as regurgitation and food passage. However, the nutritional status is better in the Billroth I group. In conclusion, because we cannot definitely ascertain which reconstruction is better when we consider both the physiologic and nutritional functions, it is reasonable that surgeon should choose reconstruction methods according to their experience and preference.