Comparison of pressure controlled, volume controlled, and volume guaranteed pressure controlled modes in prone position in patients operated for lumbar disc herniation: A randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: To compare pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), volume-controlled ventilation (VCV), and pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed (PCV-VG) modes in patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position under general anesthesia. METHODS: The study included 78 patients aged 20 to 80 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists 1-2, scheduled for lumbar spinal surgery. Patients included in the study were randomly divided into 3 groups Group-VCV; Group-PCV; Group-PCV-VG. Standard anesthesia protocol was applied. In addition to routine monitoring, train of four and BIS monitoring were performed. All ventilation modes were set with a target tidal volume of 6 to 8 mL/kg, FiO2: 0.40-0.45 and a respiratory rate of normocarbia. Positive end-expiratory pressure: 5 cm H2O, inspiration/expiration ratio = 1:2, and the maximum airway pressure:40 cm H2O. Hemodynamic, respiratory variables and arterial blood gases was measured, 15 minutes after induction of anesthesia in the supine position (T1), after prone position 15 minutes (T2), 30 minutes (T3), 45 minutes (T4), 60 minutes (T5), 75 minutes (T6), 90 minutes (T7). RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in patient characteristics. SAP, DAP, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate decreased after being placed in the prone position in all groups. Hemodynamic variables did not differ significantly between the groups. partial arterial oxygen pressure and arterial oxygen saturation levels in blood gas were found to be significantly higher in Group-PCV-VG compared to Group-PCV and Group-VCV in both the supine and prone positions. Ppeak and plateau airway pressure (Pplato) values increased and dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) values decreased after placing the patients in the prone position in all groups. Lower Ppeak and Pplato values and higher Cdyn values were observed in both the supine and prone positions in the Group-PCV-VG group compared to the Group-PCV and Group-VCV groups. CONCLUSION: PCV-VG provides lower Ppeak and Pplato values, as well as better Cdyn, oxygenation values compared to PCV and VCV. So that PCV-VG may be an effective alternative mode of mechanical ventilation for patients in the prone position during lumbar spine surgery.

Comparison of Effects of Extubation in Prone and Supine Positions in Patients Operated for Lumbar Disc Herniation.

AIM: To observe the effects of prone position extubation on respiratory side effects and hemodynamic parameters in patients who underwent lumbar spinal surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective observational study included 60 patients extubated in either the prone (n=30) or supine (n=30) positions. Heart rate, noninvasive arterial blood pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation, train of four values, and bispectral index values were measured and recorded in all patients during operation and at the time of anesthetic agent discontinuation, before and after extubation. The Aldrete recovery score was recorded together with the severity of cough during emergence and recovery. Sore throat visual analog scale (VAS) score was recorded at the first and sixth hours after extubation. Incidents such as nausea, vomiting, respiratory failure, uncontrolled airway, and decreased saturation were also recorded. RESULTS: The number and severity of cough (p < 0.05) and sore throat VAS (p < 0.001) were lower in the prone group. Postextubation breath holding was more frequent in the supine group (p < 0.001). Aldrete recovery scores were higher in the prone group (p < 0.05). Heart rate and mean arterial pressure values were not significantly different in the prone group during the emergence and recovery period as compared with the supine group (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Extubation in the prone position after lumbar spinal surgery provides more comfortable emergence and recovery periods with less alteration of respiratory status and a better recovery profile.

Retrospective Evaluation of Anaesthetic Techniques for Caesarean.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the maternal, foetal and neonatal effects of anaesthetic techniques used in caesarean sections (C/S) retrospectively over 6 years at the Hospital of Medical School of Dokuz Eylül University and to compare the results with the literature from Turkey and developed countries. METHODS: After obtaining approval from the ethics committee, anaesthetic and gestational data from all caesarean operations performed over a 6-year period between 2005 and 2010 was retrospectively obtained from hospital archives. RESULTS: During this period, a total of 10,819 labours was conducted and C/S ratio was 55% with 5953 patients. General anaesthesia was performed in 1479 patients (24.8%) and regional anaesthesia was performed in 4474 patients (75.2%) [Spinal anaesthesia for 1203 patients (26.9%), epidural anaesthesia for 830 patients (18.5%) and combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for 2441 patients (54.6%)]. In 2010, regional anaesthesia ratio increased to 84.6%, whereas in 2005, it was 63.8%. Regional anaesthesia was used significantly more often in both elective and urgent patients (82% elective and 65.2% emergency). Because of failed regional anaesthesia or surgical complications, anaesthesia was changed to general anaesthesia in 215 patients (4.8%). APGAR scores in 1 and 5 min were significantly higher with regional anaesthesia when compared with general anaesthesia. CONCLUSION: Regional anaesthesia rate for C/S patients in the Hospital of Medical School of Dokuz Eylül University is increased and is higher than Turkey's average; but these figures are still lower than those in the developed countries.