Characterisation of aluminium release by the enFlow® fluid-warming system in crystalloids and blood products.

The use of uncoated aluminium-heated plates in an intravenous fluid-warming system has been shown to produce high levels of aluminium in Sterofundin 1/1E, a balanced crystalloid solution. However, the effect of this fluid-warming device on other balanced crystalloid solutions and blood products has not been studied. Using mass spectrometry we measured aluminium levels in Plasma-Lyte 148, compound sodium lactate solution, 4% human albumin solution, expired resuspended packed red cells and fresh frozen plasma that were pumped through an enFlow® fluid-warming system at 2 ml.min-1 . Samples were taken at baseline before heating and then at 10-min intervals up to 60 min with the system set to warm the fluids to 40 °C. High concentrations of aluminium were found for Plasma-Lyte 148 and compound sodium lactate solutions (mean (SD) 223 (0.6) µmol.l-1 and 163 (0.2) µmol.l-1 at 60 min, respectively); both concentrations were significantly greater than the United States Food and Drug Administration recommended maximum limit for aluminium in intravenous nutrition of 25 µg.l-1 (0.9 µmol.l-1 ). Lower aluminium levels were found in 4% human albumin solutions, expired resuspended red cells and fresh frozen plasma at 60 min (mean (SD) 5.7 (0.1) µmol.l-1 , 2.7 (0.0) µmol.l-1 and 2.3 (0.4) µmol.l-1 , respectively). The process allowing addition of aluminium to be added to Sterofundin 1/1E by the enFlow fluid warmer also occurs in Plasma-Lyte 148 and compound sodium lactate solutions and to a lesser degree in blood products. The exact mechanism facilitating this process and its clinical significance remain unclear.

Accuracy and reliability of the i-STAT point-of-care device for the determination of haemoglobin concentration before and after major blood loss.

We investigated the accuracy of i-STAT(®) (Abbott Point of Care Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA) haemoglobin (Hb) measurement in surgical patients with an estimated blood loss of ≥25% of total blood volume. Blood tests for i-STAT(®) Hb, laboratory Hb (Sysmex XE-2100(™), Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan) and total plasma proteins were obtained at the start of surgery (T=0) and when an estimated 25% total blood volume loss had occurred (T=1). Thirty-one patients were recruited. The coefficient of variation of the paired i-STAT(®) Hb estimates was 2.8% and 2.9% at T=0 and T=1, respectively. The mean difference between i-STAT(®) and laboratory Hb was -7.6 g/l (standard deviation 6.5) at T=0 and -5.1 g/l (standard deviation 12) at T=1. The mean total plasma protein difference (total plasma protein T=0 minus T=1) was 13.6 g/l (95% confidence interval 10.2 to 17.0). There was poor correlation between total plasma protein and bias in i-STAT(®) measurements. The i-STAT(®) Hb had an acceptable coefficient of variation, but the Hb levels were lower than those estimated by the laboratory. The standard deviation of i-STAT(®) Hb was greater after ≥25% estimated total blood volume loss. Clinicians should not use the i-STAT(®) Hb in isolation for clinical decision-making when considering blood transfusion in a situation of 25% or greater blood loss.