[Patients in the IDEAL cohort: A snapshot of severe asthma in France]. / Les patients de la cohorte IDEAL : une photographie de l'asthme sévère en France.

INTRODUCTION: This paper reports the French data from a post-hoc analysis of the international IDEAL study, which aimed to describe a recent cohort of patients with severe asthma, the impact of the disease on quality of life, as well as the population of patients eligible for treatment with omalizumab, mepolizumab and reslizumab. METHODS: Eligible patients were≥12 years of age, with severe asthma (GINA steps 4 and 5). RESULTS: A total of 129 patients were included in this post-hoc analysis. Their mean age was 53 years, the majority were overweight, they were mainly women (64%) and had at least one medical comorbidity (85%). More than half had suffered from asthma for more than 25 years and were non-smokers. Lung function was moderately impaired. Blood eosinophil count was≥150 cells/µL in 66% of patients,≥300 cells/µL in 34% of patients, and≥500 cells/µL in 12% of patients. One out of three patients was currently treated with omalizumab and 24% had maintenance oral corticosteroids. Asthma was poorly controlled with a negative impact on quality of life (ACQ≥1.5) in 67% of patients. In this population 40% of patients were eligible for omalizumab, 27% for mepolizumab and 2% for reslizumab. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that a considerable proportion of patients with severe asthma remain uncontrolled and are not eligible for any of the available biological treatments. This underlines the need for therapeutic innovations in this disease.

Estimating breast cancer mortality reduction and overdiagnosis due to screening for different strategies in the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND: The benefits and harms of population-wide mammography screening have been long debated. This study evaluated the impact of screening frequency and age range on breast cancer mortality reduction and overdiagnosis. METHODS: We developed a Markov simulation model for the evaluation of mammography screening in a cohort of British women born in 1935-40. RESULTS: For triennial screening in women aged 47-73, breast cancer mortality reduction and overdiagnosis was 18.1% (95% confidence interval: 17.3%, 19.0%) and 5.6% (5.1%, 6.1%), of all breast cancer deaths and diagnoses, respectively, from age 40 to 85 years. For annual screening in the same age range, estimates for both outcomes increased considerably to 35.0% (34.2%, 35.7%) and 7.6% (7.1%, 8.1%), respectively. For the age extension of triennial screening from 50-70 to 47-73, we estimated 5 (3, 7) incremental breast cancer deaths avoided and 14 (9, 19) incremental cases overdiagnosed per 10 000 women invited for screening. CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of mortality reduction and overdiagnosis were highly dependent on screening frequency, age range, and uptake, which may explain differences between some previous estimates obtained from randomised trials and from service screening.