Impact of pharmaceutical care pathway established in hepatobiliary surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical pharmacists play a pivotal role in ensuring medication safety due to their detailed understanding of the medication-use process. This study aimed to propose the concept of pharmaceutical care pathway (PCP) in surgical care and design the work pattern and workflow in the healthcare systems of China. SETTING: Data were collected from patients in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang in China between January 2019 and December 2019. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted using 346 patients in the control group and 363 in the intervention group. The control group was managed only by the clinical pathway (CP), while the intervention group was managed by the CP and PCP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs), patient satisfaction, hospital expense, drug cost, length of stay, and prescription situations were documented. RESULTS: Using PCP, the rational use of drugs increased from 56% in the control group to 94.2% in the intervention group. Further, 124 (35.8%) ADRs in the control group and 44 (12.1%) ADRs in the intervention group were assessed using the Karch and -Lasagna scale. The mean hospital expense was 21,949.12 ± 2,311.25 yuan in the control group and 17,566.25 ± 1,082.56 yuan in the intervention group. The mean drug cost was 6,250.69 ± 589.35 yuan and 4,894.22 ± 356.14 yuan (1 US$ = 6.37 yuan). The mean length of stay was 12.23 ± 2.51 days and 8.35 ± 1.32 days in the control and intervention groups, respectively. Patient satisfaction increased significantly. CONCLUSION: PCP reduced the length of stay for patients and drug-related adverse events, increased the rational use of drugs, cost-effectiveness, patient satisfaction, and consequently, improved the quality of service in surgery medicine.

Comparative efficacies of nebulized budesonide and systemic corticosteroids in the treatment of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Corticosteroids are recommended by almost all international guidelines for the management of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Nevertheless, due to their side effects, there are still concerns regarding the use of systemic corticosteroids (SCs). The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guideline states nebulized budesonide (NB) may be a suitable alternative to SCs for treating COPD exacerbations. We conducted this study to systematically compare the efficacies of NB and SCs by using a meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched from database inception to 10 October 2019. Our main end points were change in pulmonary function and blood gas analysis. Secondary end points were numbers of exacerbations and hyperglycaemia. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Of 645 identified studies, 6 were eligible and were included in our analysis (N = 867 participants). Compared with SCs, NB was non-inferior on the change in FEV1 %predicted at 24 hours, 48-72 hours and 5-7 days; FEV1 at 5-7 days; FEV1 /FVC at 7 days. For blood gas analysis, our meta-analysis indicated that PaO2 , PaCO2 at 24 hours, 48-72 hours and 7-10 days and SaO2 at 24 hours and 7-10 days showed a non-significant difference in both groups, whereas the SaO2 was significant higher in NB group at 48-72 hours after treatment. Hyperglycaemia was less frequent with NB (odds ratio, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.01-0.85; P = .04). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Based on our meta-analysis, NB was not inferior to SCs when used in the treatment of COPD exacerbations. However, additional well-designed prospective studies are needed to identify the optimal dose of nebulized budesonide and the effects of nebulized budesonide in outpatients, or patients in ICU settings.