Outcomes of Anterior Chamber, Sulcus, and Pars Plana Glaucoma Drainage Device Placement in Glaucoma Patients.

Purpose: To assess outcomes of anterior chamber (AC), sulcus, and pars plana (PP) glaucoma drainage device (GDD) placement in glaucoma patients. Patients and Methods. Retrospective evaluation of glaucoma patients who underwent GDD insertion in the AC, sulcus, or PP at Massachusetts Eye and Ear between November 2016 and May 2021. Patients who received AC, sulcus, and pars plana tubes were selected using simple random sampling, and the first 40 patients meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed. Main outcome measures were cumulative success probabilities from Kaplan-Meier (KM) analyses, intraocular pressure (IOP), medication burden, and complication rates. Results: The PP group had a larger proportion of Ahmed GDDs and was younger on average with less severe glaucoma compared to patients with AC or sulcus tubes. The PP group had a higher proportion of mixed-mechanism glaucoma and lower proportion of primary open-angle glaucoma. With success defined as IOP reduction ≥20% and 5 < IOP ≤ 21 mm Hg, the Kaplan-Meier cumulative success probabilities for all three GDD locations were not significantly different. No significant differences were found in complication rates between all groups after 3 months. Patients with PP GDD had significantly lower medication burden than those with AC or sulcus GDDs up to 1.5 years postoperatively (1.7 ± 1.1, 3.0 ± 1.4, and 2.8 ± 1.2 for PP, AC, and sulcus, respectively; P=0.017). Conclusion: PP GDDs may be more effective in lowering medication burden than AC or sulcus tubes without compromising long-term safety.

Risk Factors for Glaucoma Drainage Device Revision or Removal Using the IRIS Registry.

PURPOSE: To elucidate risk factors for revision or removal of glaucoma drainage devices (GDD) in glaucoma patients in the United States. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: IRIS Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) patients who underwent GDD insertion between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2018 were included. Various demographic and clinical factors were collected. Kaplan-Meier survival plots, Cox proportional-hazard models utilizing Firth's Penalized Likelihood, and multivariate linear regression models were used. The main outcome measures were hazard ratios (HR) and beta coefficient (ß) estimates. RESULTS: A total of 44,330 distinct patients underwent at least 1 GDD implantation, and 3354 of these underwent subsequent GDD revision or removal surgery. With failure defined as GDD revision/removal, factors significantly associated with decreased failure included unknown race (HR = 0.83; P = .004) and unknown ethnicity (HR = 0.68; P < .001). Factors associated with increased risk of GDD revision/removal surgery included presence of chronic angle-closure glaucoma (HR = 1.32; P < .001) and dry eye disease (HR = 1.30; P = .007). Additionally, factors associated with a decreased average time (in days) to GDD revision/removal included male sex (ß = -25.96; P = .044), unknown race (ß = -55.28; P = .013), and right-eye laterality (ß = -38.67; P = .026). Factors associated with an increased average time to GDD revision/removal included having a history of a past eye procedure (ß = 104.83; P < .001) and being an active smoker (ß = 38.15; P = .024). CONCLUSIONS: The size and scope of the IRIS Registry allows for detection of subtle associations between risk factors and GDD revision or removal surgery. The aforementioned demographic and clinical factors may all have an impact on GDD longevity and can inform the treatment options available for glaucoma patients.

Effects of Postoperative Intravitreal Injections on Outcomes of Traditional Glaucoma Surgery in Patients with Preoperative Intravitreal Injections.

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation and trabeculectomies with and without postoperative intravitreal injections (IVIs) in glaucoma patients with a history of preoperative IVIs. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 133 eyes of 133 glaucoma patients who underwent GDD implantation or trabeculectomy with at least 1 IVI preoperatively between January 2005 and October 2020 at Massachusetts Eye and Ear. METHODS: Chart review of glaucoma patients with traditional glaucoma surgery and at least 1 IVI before surgery. All statistical analyses were conducted with R statistical programming software. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraocular pressure (IOP), medication burden, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Kaplan-Meier success rates, adjusted hazard ratios (HRs), and complications. RESULTS: Baseline demographics were similar between the groups with and without postoperative IVIs. The group with postoperative IVIs had a higher proportion of diabetic retinopathy and retinal vascular occlusions than the group without postoperative IVIs, which had more eyes with age-related macular degeneration. Intraocular pressure, medication burden, and visual acuity were similar between groups at all time points except for IOP at 6 weeks, which was lower in the group with postoperative IVIs. The group with postoperative IVIs had significantly more preoperative IVIs than the group without postoperative IVIs (6.6 vs. 3.3, P = 0.017). For success defined as IOP reduction ≥ 20% with 5 < IOP ≤ 21 mmHg, Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated similar success rates between groups with and without IVIs. When stratified by the number of IVIs, success rates for the group with 7 or more IVIs were significantly higher than the success rates for the group with 0-6 IVIs (P = 0.005). Each additional postoperative IVI resulted in a 7.2% decrease in the hazard of failure to achieve our stated success criteria. With regard to late complications, the group with postoperative IVIs had a higher incidence of vitreous hemorrhage (18.5% vs. 3.2%, P = 0.039) than the group without postoperative IVIs. CONCLUSIONS: A higher number of postoperative IVIs, specifically 7 or more IVIs, may be associated with improved success rates of traditional glaucoma surgery in glaucoma patients who received IVIs before surgery.

Outcomes of a combination of augmented MicroPulse and limited Continuous Wave Cyclophotocoagulation in patients with refractory glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and effectiveness of augmented MicroPulse (MP-TSCPC) with limited Continuous Wave Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation (CW-TSCPC) in patients with refractory glaucoma. METHODS: Thirty-eight eyes of 38 patients underwent combined MP-TSCPC and CW-TSCPC at Massachusetts Eye and Ear. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Wilcoxon paired sign rank tests were performed to evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP), glaucoma medication burden, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and adverse events. RESULTS: With success defined as IOP reduction ≥ 30% and IOP between 5 and 18 mmHg, the cumulative probability of success at 1 year and 1.5 years were 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.68-0.96) and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.50-0.86), respectively. With success defined as IOP reduction ≥ 50% and IOP between 5 and 18 mmHg, the success probability at 1 year and 1.5 years were 0.72 (95% CI, 0.57-0.89) and 0.56 (95% CI, 0.40-0.78), respectively. IOP and medication burden reductions were significant at all follow-up visits compared to baseline. Average IOP decreased from 27.9 mmHg at baseline to 11.4 mmHg at 1 year (p < 0.001) and 10.0 mmHg at 1.5 years (p < 0.001). Average medication burden decreased from 3.8 to 1.7 at 1.5 years (p = 0.001). No significant differences in visual acuity were observed at any time point. No long-term sight-threatening complications due to the combined procedure were observed, and most of the complications observed were mild and transient. CONCLUSION: In patients with refractory glaucoma, the combination of augmented MP-TSCPC with limited CW-TSCPC provides a significant IOP-lowering effect and decrease in medication burden without increased risk of postoperative complications.

Case Report: Reversal and subsequent return of optic disc cupping in a myocilin (MYOC) gene-associated severe Juvenile Open-Angle Glaucoma (JOAG) patient.

To our knowledge, this case report describes the first instance of reversal of glaucomatous optic nerve cupping in a young adult with a rare form of juvenile open-angle glaucoma (JOAG) associated with a novel variant of the myocilin gene (MYOC). This 25-year-old woman with severe-stage MYOC-associated JOAG presented with blurry vision and intermittent pain in her left eye. She had a strong family history of glaucoma in multiple first-degree relatives with an identified novel variant of MYOC. Examination revealed intraocular pressures (IOPs) of 10 mmHg OD and 46 mmHg OS, with cup-to-disc ratios of 0.90 and 0.80. The patient experienced substantial reversal of optic disc cupping OS following dramatic IOP reduction with trabeculectomy, and subsequently experienced a return of cupping after an IOP spike 15 months postoperatively. The reversal of cupping did not correspond to any changes in the patient's visual field. After an initial decrease in retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, RNFL remained stable for over 2 years after trabeculectomy as seen on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). This case suggests reversal of cupping can occur well into adulthood in a MYOC-associated JOAG patient, and it demonstrates the potential bidirectionality of this phenomenon. Moreover, it suggests that these structural changes may not correspond to any functional changes in visual fields or RNFL thickness.

Safety and efficacy of microinvasive glaucoma surgery with cataract extraction in patients with normal-tension glaucoma.

This study assesses the safety and efficacy of microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) with cataract extraction in patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG). In our sample of 45 NTG patients, mean intraocular pressure (IOP) decreased from 13.7 to 12.3 mmHg at 2.5 years, and mean medication burden decreased from 2.0 to 1.1 at 1.5 years. For success defined as IOP reduction ≥ 30% from baseline IOP with medication burden reduction from preoperative levels, success probability was 5.4% at 1.5 years. For success defined as medication burden reduction with an IOP reaching goal IOP as determined by the glaucoma specialist, success probabilities were 67.2% at 1.5 years and 29.4% at 2.5 years. At the last follow-up visit, eyes with two MIGS procedures with different mechanisms of action achieved successful medication reduction 68.8% of the time versus 35.7% achieved by a single MIGS procedure (p = 0.052). At their last visit, visual acuity was unchanged or improved in all eyes (100%). MIGS with cataract surgery results in modest reductions in IOP and medication burden in NTG patients, which may lead to lower costs and better therapeutic compliance. A combination of two MIGS procedures with different mechanisms of action may potentially be more effective in reducing medication burden than a single MIGS procedure in NTG patients. Further research is necessary to ascertain whether MIGS for NTG patients may help decrease medication burden while helping achieve goal IOP.

Combined pars plana glaucoma drainage device placement and vitrectomy using a vitrectomy sclerotomy site for tube placement: a case series.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to report the safety and efficacy of pars plana glaucoma drainage devices with pars plana vitrectomy using one of the vitrectomy sclerotomy sites for tube placement in patients with refractory glaucoma. METHODS: Retrospective case series of 28 eyes of 28 patients who underwent combined pars plana glaucoma drainage device and pars plana vitrectomy between November 2016 and September 2019 at Massachusetts Eye and Ear. Main outcome measures were intraocular pressure (IOP), glaucoma medication burden, best corrected visual acuity, and complications. Statistical tests were performed with R and included Kaplan-Meier analyses, Wilcoxon paired signed-rank tests, and Fisher tests. RESULTS: Mean IOP decreased from 22.8 mmHg to 11.8 mmHg at 1.5 years (p = 0.002), and mean medication burden decreased from 4.3 to 2.1 at 1.5 years (p = 0.004). Both IOP and medication burden were significantly lower at all follow-up time points. The probability of achieving 5 < IOP ≤ 18 mmHg with at least 20% IOP reduction from preoperative levels was 86.4% at 1 year and 59.8% at 1.5 years. At their last visit, three eyes (10.7%) achieved complete success with IOP reduction as above without medications, and 14 eyes (50.0%) achieved qualified success with medications. Hypotony was observed in 1 eye (3.6%) prior to 3 months postoperatively and 0 eyes after 3 months. Visual acuity was unchanged or improved in 23 eyes (82.1%) at their last follow-up. Two patients had a visual acuity decrease of > 2 lines. Two eyes required subsequent pars plana vitrectomies for tube obstruction, and one eye had transient hypotony. CONCLUSIONS: The results of pars plana glaucoma drainage device and pars plana vitrectomy using one of the vitrectomy sclerotomy sites for tube placement are promising, resulting in significant IOP and medication-burden reductions through postoperative year 1.5 without additional risk of postoperative complications. Inserting glaucoma drainage devices into an existing vitrectomy sclerotomy site may potentially save surgical time by obviating the need to create another sclerotomy for tube placement and suture one of the vitrectomy ports.

Barriers to Scale of Digital Health Systems for Cancer Care and Control in Last-Mile Settings.

The growing cancer epidemic is a major public health challenge globally but especially in low- and middle-income countries where patients often have to make long and complex journeys to receive care. Extending cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment to low- and middle-income countries through innovative solutions such as digital health systems is an urgent health priority. We contend that such digital systems will achieve success and scale only when existing gaps in cancer care and control policies and practices are addressed to strengthen health systems and improve outcomes. We call for concerted action to focus on the effective implementation of cancer care and control policies and practice in last-mile settings to improve pathways to care for people with and at risk for cancer.