Low back pain in patients hospitalised with liver cirrhosis- a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Lower back pain is a common issue, but little is known about the prevalence of pain in patients with liver cirrhosis during hospitalisation. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine lower back pain in patients with liver cirrhosis. METHODS: The sample consisted of patients with liver cirrhosis (n = 79; men n = 55; women n = 24; mean age = 55.79 ± 12.52 years). The hospitalised patients were mobile. The presence and intensity of pain were assessed in the lumbar spine during hospitalisation. The presence of pain was assessed using the visual analogue pain scale (0-10). The range of motion of the lower spine was assessed using the Schober and Stibor tests. Frailty was measured by Liver Frailty Index (LFI). The condition of liver disease was evaluated using The Model For the End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and Child-Pugh score (CPS) and ascites classification. Student's t test and Mann-Whitney test were used for analysis of the difference of group. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Tukey post hoc test was used to test differences between categories of liver frailty index. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test pain distribution. Statistical significance was determined at the α-0.05 significance level. RESULT: The prevalence of pain in patients with liver cirrhosis was 13.92% (n = 11), and the mean intensity of pain according to the visual analogue scale was 3.73 (± 1.90). Lower back pain was present in patients with ascites (15.91%; n = 7) and without ascites (11.43%; n = 4). The prevalence of lower back pain was not statistically significant between patients with and without ascites (p = 0,426). The base of Schober's assessment mean score was 3.74 cm (± 1.81), and based on Stibor's assessment mean score was 5.84 cm (± 2.23). CONCLUSION: Lower back pain in patients with liver cirrhosis is a problem that requires attention. Restricted spinal mobility has been reported in patients with back pain, according to Stibor, compared to patients without pain. There was no difference in the incidence of pain in patients with and without ascites.

Effect of Tumor Size and p16 Status on Treatment Outcomes - Achievement of Complete Remission in Prospectively Followed Patients with Oropharyngeal Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Oropharyngeal squamous cell tumors associated with human papillomavirus infection (p16 positive tumors) have better prognosis than p16 negative tumors regardless of the more advanced stage of the disease. Tumor volume (GTVt+n) is generally an important factor affecting treatment results of ionizing radiation. The aim of this prospective non-randomized study is to evaluate the effect of tumor volume on the (chemo)radiation treatment results in a group of patients with p16 negative and p16 positive oropharyngeal tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with confirmed squamous cell tumor of the oropharynx of stages III and IV, according to the 7th version of the TNM (tumor-nodes-metastases) classification, were eligible for this study. The main exclusion criteria were palliative treatment, neoadjuvant chemotherapy or planned concomitant therapy with cetuximab. Patients were treated according to standardized protocols with curative intent. Primary tumor volume (GTVt) and involved nodes volume (GTVn) were obtained from radiotherapy planning system for further statistical analysis. The differences in tumor volumes between the groups according to p16 expression were assessed with subsequent testing of probability to achieve complete remission (CR) of the disease in both groups. RESULTS: In total, 49 patients - 84% men, median age 60.5 years, 25 (51%) patients p16 positive, 40 (82%) underwent concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Median of GTVt in the whole patients group is 40.2 ccm, GTVn 11.78 ccm and median volume of the whole tumor burden (GTVt+n) 70.21 ccm (range 11.05-249). Median of GTVn was greater in the p16 positive cohort (p = 0.041). In the entire group, the median time to reach CR was 91 days (95% CI 86-107 days) from the end of radiotherapy. In the group of p16 negative patients, 14 achieved CR (61%) out of 23 patients, in p16 positive group 20 (80%) out of 25 patients (p = 0.111). P16 negative patients had a longer time to CR (p = 0.196, HR 1.58, 95% CI 0.79-3.18). None of the independently assessed volumetric parameters of the tumor (GTVt, GTVn, GTVt+n) affected CR in the p16 positive patients group, while there was a significant impact of the whole tumor burden (GTVt+n) in the p16 negative cohort (median 58.1 ccm in CR patients vs. 101.9 ccm, p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: We have showed less GTVt+n dependence to achieve CR in p16 positive tumors in comparison with p16 negative tumors. Thus, p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers should not be withdrawn from the curative treatment intent based on the greater GTVt+n. Key words oropharyngeal neoplasms - p16 status - treatment outcome - tumor burden - complete remission This work was supported by grant of the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic AZV 15-31627A and by grant of the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic - Conceptual development of a research organization (MMCI 00209805). The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers. Submitted: 2. 11. 2018 Accepted: 11. 11. 2018.

Aggressive sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelid: an elusive diagnosis.

Sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelid, an extremely rare neoplasm, can resemble blepharitis, conjunctivitis, or chalazion, as in the case presented here. A biopsy specimen should be examined if these conditions fail to respond to therapy, especially if the lesion is unilateral. The tumor can be multifocal, and pagetoid proliferation is common. Therefore, recurrences are common after conservative surgery, even if frozen sections are obtained from the margins. Orbital exenteration may be necessary to prevent metastasis.