Real-World Experience with a Human Fibrinogen Concentrate: Clinical Data from Adult and Pediatric Patients Requiring Fibrinogen for Bleeding Control and Prevention.

Human fibrinogen concentrate (Fibryga) received temporary approval for fibrinogen replacement therapy in France (2017), with subsequent full approval for congenital and acquired hypofibrinogenemia. We evaluated real-world use for on-demand treatment of bleeding and prophylaxis to enhance our knowledge on fibrinogen concentrate as an option for fibrinogen replacement. Data were retrospectively collected from adult and pediatric patients with fibrinogen deficiency. The primary end point was indication for fibrinogen concentrate use; the secondary end point was treatment success for on-demand treatment/perioperative prophylaxis. The study included 150 adult (median age, 62 years; range, 18-94 years) and 50 pediatric (median age, 3 years; range, 0.01-17 years) patients with acquired fibrinogen deficiency. Fibrinogen concentrate was administered to 47.3% for nonsurgical bleeding, 22.7% for surgical bleeding, and 30.0% for perioperative prophylaxis in adult patients, and to 4.0% for surgical bleeding and 96.0% for perioperative prophylaxis in pediatric patients. Cardiac surgeries accounted for 79.5%/75.0% perioperative prophylaxis and 82.4%/100.0% surgical bleeding cases in adult/pediatric patients, respectively. The mean ± standard deviation (SD, median) total fibrinogen doses were 3.06 ± 1.69 g (32.61 mg/kg), 2.09 ± 1.36 g (22.99 mg/kg), and 2.36 ± 1.25 g (29.67 mg/kg) for adult nonsurgical bleeding, surgical bleeding, and perioperative prophylaxis, respectively; doses of 0.75 ± 0.35 g (47.64 mg/kg) and 0.83 ± 0.62 g (55.56 mg/kg) were used for pediatric surgical bleeding and perioperative prophylaxis, respectively. Treatment success was 85.7%/97.1/93.3% in adults and 50.0%/87.5% in pediatrics for nonsurgical bleeding (adults only), surgical bleeding, and perioperative prophylaxis, respectively. Fibrinogen concentrate demonstrated favorable effectiveness and safety across the age groups. This study contributes to evidence supporting fibrinogen concentrate for bleeding control/prevention in real-world clinical practice, particularly for patients with acquired fibrinogen deficiency.

Changes of anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies titers after biologic treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review and retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: There is an increasing body of evidence suggesting a direct pathophysiological role of anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and immunological remission could be a target for treatment. However, data related to the ability of biologics to reduce ACPA titres are contradictory.We aimed to evaluate the changes in ACPA titres after treatment with different biologics in patients with RA. METHODS: As a first step, a systematic review of the literature available on 3 biologics (TNFi, abatacept and rituximab) and ACPA in patients with RA was performed in Pubmed and Cochrane. As a second step, a retrospective study was performed: all RA patients treated with the 3 above-mentioned biologics were identified. To be included in the analysis, patients had to have at least two titres of ACPA (one before and one after biologic treatment) available. ACPA titres were compared before and after treatment in each of the treatment groups. RESULTS: As a result of the literature review, 24 articles were retained confirming that the data on change in ACPA under biologics is contradictory, particularly for abatacept and TNFi. 144 RA patients (79.3% female, mean age: 56 years) were included in the retrospective analysis: 59 patients had received rituximab, 31 abatacept, 55 TNFi. ACPA titres decreased significantly with rituximab but not with abatacept nor TNFi. Modelling of ACPA titres over follow-up confirmed the significant decrease of ACPA over time rituximab. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-life study, ACPA titres only significantly decreased after treatment with rituximab.

EULAR definition of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Despite treatment according to the current management recommendations, a significant proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remain symptomatic. These patients can be considered to have 'difficult-to-treat RA'. However, uniform terminology and an appropriate definition are lacking. OBJECTIVE: The Task Force in charge of the "Development of EULAR recommendations for the comprehensive management of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis" aims to create recommendations for this underserved patient group. Herein, we present the definition of difficult-to-treat RA, as the first step. METHODS: The Steering Committee drafted a definition with suggested terminology based on an international survey among rheumatologists. This was discussed and amended by the Task Force, including rheumatologists, nurses, health professionals and patients, at a face-to-face meeting until sufficient agreement was reached (assessed through voting). RESULTS: The following three criteria were agreed by all Task Force members as mandatory elements of the definition of difficult-to-treat RA: (1) Treatment according to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendation and failure of ≥2 biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs)/targeted synthetic DMARDs (with different mechanisms of action) after failing conventional synthetic DMARD therapy (unless contraindicated); (2) presence of at least one of the following: at least moderate disease activity; signs and/or symptoms suggestive of active disease; inability to taper glucocorticoid treatment; rapid radiographic progression; RA symptoms that are causing a reduction in quality of life; and (3) the management of signs and/or symptoms is perceived as problematic by the rheumatologist and/or the patient. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed EULAR definition for difficult-to-treat RA can be used in clinical practice, clinical trials and can form a basis for future research.

Impact of a pharmacist-led programme on biologics knowledge and adherence in patients with spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: In spondyloarthritis (SpA), improving patients' knowledge on their biologics is a key factor to enhance adherence. The information given to the patient has to ensure the acquisition of safety skills regarding their treatment. The aims of this trial were to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist's educational interview on knowledge and adherence to biologics in these patients. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients with well-controlled axial SpA, stable on biologics were enrolled in a randomised, controlled, single-centre, open-label, 6-month trial. A pharmacist's educational interview provided information on biologics management at baseline in the intervention group and at month 6 in the control group. The changes in a weighted knowledge score concerning the management of biologics and the change in the Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) at month-6 were primary outcomes. The changes in disease activity (BASDAI) and patients' satisfaction regarding the pharmacists' interview were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Patients' characteristics at baseline were comparable among the 89 included patients (46 in the intervention group, 43 in the control group). The patient's knowledge score concerning biologics management improved at a greater magnitude in the educational group (+11.0±11.5 vs. +3.0 ±10.6 in the intervention versus the control group, respectively, p<0.0001). There was also a trend in a better adherence (+2.2±13.9 vs. -0.6±18.9 in the intervention versus the control group, respectively, p=0.691). The disease activity remained stable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study is strongly in favour of the benefit of a pharmacist's educational interview in the management of patients with axial SpA.

Effects of successive switches to different biosimilars infliximab on immunogenicity in chronic inflammatory diseases in daily clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluatre the risk of immunogenicity in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases who experienced successive non-medical swiches to different biosimilars infliximab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational study over a 3-year observation period assessing the risk of immunogenicity in i) patients in maintenance therapy with innovator infliximab who were successively switched to CT-P13, then to SB2 (cohort-1) and ii) biologic-naive patients initiated with CT-P13 before being switched to SB2 (cohort-2). A propotion meta-analysis was also performed, integrating our results to 16 additional studies. RESULTS: Cohort-1 included 265 patients who switched to CT-P13, and 140 patients were subsequently switched to SB2. Among the 235 anti-drug antibody (ADA)-free patients at baseline, 20 patients (8.5%) developed ADA over the 3-year observation period (rate of 3 for 100 patient years). Cohort-2 included 44 patients, of whom 29 subsequently switched to SB2. A total of 11 patients (25%) developed ADA within 3 years (rate of 14 for 100 patients years). We found no influence of the number of biosimilars infliximab received on ADA deveopment in both cohorts. The risk of treatment discontinuation was significantly higher in patients with positive ADA in both cohorts. The meta-analysis including our data exposed an incidence of immunogenicity of 4.7% (95% CI 3.5-6.1%) after the switch from innovator infliximab to biosimilar infliximab and 21.1% (95% CI 13.1-30.3%) in patients initiating biosimilar infliximab. CONCLUSION: Immunogenicity was not favored by successive non-medical switches to biosimilars infliximab in our study, but was associated with treatment discontinuation.

Recommendations for the assessment and optimization of adherence to disease-modifying drugs in chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases: A process based on literature reviews and expert consensus.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to treatment is a key issue in chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRDs). OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations to facilitate in daily practice, the management of non-adherence to disease-modifying drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, connective tissue diseases or other CIRDs. METHODS: The process comprised (a) systematic literature reviews of methods (including questionnaires) to measure non-adherence, risk factors for non-adherence and efficacy of targeted interventions; (b) development of recommendations through consensus of 104 rheumatologist and nurse experts; (c) assessment of agreement and ease of applicability (1-5 where 5 is highest) by the 104 experts. RESULTS: (a) Overall, 274 publications were analysed. (b) The consensus process led to 5 overarching principles and 10 recommendations regarding adherence. Key points include that adherence should be assessed at each outpatient visit, at least using an open question; questionnaires and hydroxychloroquine blood level assessments may also be useful. Risk factors associated to non-adherence were listed. Patient information and education, and patient/physician shared decision, are key to optimize adherence. Other techniques such as formalized education sessions, motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral therapy may be useful. All health professionals can get involved and e-health may be a support. (c) The agreement with the recommendations was high (range of means, 3.9-4.5) but ease of applicability was lower (2.7-4.4). CONCLUSIONS: Using an evidence-based approach followed by expert consensus, this initiative should improve the assessment and optimization of adherence in chronic inflammatory rheumatic disorders.

Methods to improve medication adherence in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVE: Lack of adherence to treatment is frequent in chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases and is associated with poorer outcomes. The objective of this study was to describe and evaluate interventions that have been proposed to enhance medication adherence in these conditions. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed in Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase and clinicaltrials.gov databases completed by the rheumatology meeting (ACR, EULAR and SFR) abstracts from last 2 years. All studies in English or French evaluating an intervention to improve medication adherence in chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA), crystal related diseases, connective tissue diseases, vasculitis and Still's disease) were included. Interventions on adherence were collected and classified in five modalities (educational, behavioural, cognitive behavioural, multicomponent interventions or others). RESULTS: 1325 abstracts were identified and 22 studies were finally included (18 studies in RA (72%), 4 studies in systemic lupus erythematosus (16%), 2 studies in SpA (8%) and 1 study in gout (4%)). On 13 randomised controlled trials (RCT) (1535 patients), only 5 were positive (774 patients). Educational interventions were the most represented and had the highest level of evidence: 8/13 RCT (62%, 1017 patients) and 4/8 were positive (50%). In these studies, each patient was individually informed or educated by different actors (physicians, pharmacists, nurses and so on). Supports and contents of these educational interventions were heterogenous. CONCLUSION: Despite the importance of medication adherence in chronic inflammatory rheumatic disorders, evidence on interventions to improve medication adherence is scarce.

Systematic switch from innovator infliximab to biosimilar infliximab in inflammatory chronic diseases in daily clinical practice: The experience of Cochin University Hospital, Paris, France.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate effectiveness of systematic switching treatment from innovator infliximab to biosimilar infliximab, and its associated factors. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, all adult patients receiving maintenance therapy with innovator infliximab in Cochin University Hospital were systematically switched to biosimilar infliximab. Effectiveness was assessed by the retention rate of biosimilar infliximab at the time of the third infusion. Sensitivity analyses for effectiveness included changes of disease activity parameters and infliximab trough levels between baseline and the last visit as well as the occurrence of adverse events leading to drug discontinuation. Factors associated with biosimilar infliximab discontinuation at the last visit were explored. RESULTS: A total of 260 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, including 31 rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 131 axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and 64 inflammatory bowel diseases. The retention rate was 85% (221/260 patients) at the time of the third biosimilar infusion. Between baseline and the last visit (mean follow-up of 34 weeks), 59 patients (23%) discontinued biosimilar infliximab, mainly due to experienced inefficacy (n = 47, 80%). No clinical or biological factors were associated with biosimilar discontinuation. No serious adverse events occurred. No change in objective disease activity parameters or infliximab trough levels was detected. However, a significant increase of BASDAI (2.94 ± 2.20 vs. 3.18 ± 2.21, P = 0.046, before vs. after switch, respectively) was observed in patients with axSpA. Innovator infliximab was re-established in 47/59 patients (80%). CONCLUSION: No changes in drug trough levels or objective parameters were observed after the systematic switch to biosimilar infliximab in a real clinical practice setting. Only changes in patient-reported outcomes were observed, suggesting attribution effects rather than pharmacological differences.

Reducing medication errors at admission: 3 cycles to implement, improve and sustain medication reconciliation.

BACKGROUND: In France, medication errors are the third leading cause of serious adverse events. Many studies have shown the positive impact of medication reconciliation (MR) on reducing medication errors at admission but this practice is still rarely implemented in French hospitals. OBJECTIVE: Implement and sustain a MR process at admission in two surgery units. The quality improvement approach used to meet this objective is described. SETTING: The gastrointestinal surgery and orthopedic surgery departments of a 407 inpatient bed French teaching hospital. METHODS: A step by step collaborative approach based on plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles. Three cycles were successively performed with regular feedback during multidisciplinary meetings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: mean unintended medication discrepancies (UMDs) per patients at admission. RESULTS: The three PDSA cycles and the monitoring phase allowed to implement, optimize and sustain a MR process in the two surgery units. Cycle 1, by showing a rate of 0.65 UMDs at admission (95 % CI 0.39-0.91), underlined the need for a MR process; cycle 2 showed how the close-collaboration between pharmacy and surgery units could help to reduce mean UMDs per patients at admission (0.18; 95 % CI 0.09-0.27) (p < 0.001); finally, cycle 3 allowed the optimization of the MR process by reducing the delays of the best possible medication history availability. CONCLUSIONS: This work highlights how a collaborative quality-improvement approach based on PDSA cycles can meet the challenge of implementing MR to improve medication management at admission.