Assessment of Posttransplant Bacteremia Caused by Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria Among Kidney Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative rods (ESBL-GNR) are a rising cause of bacteremia in kidney transplant recipients (KT). The study purpose was to examine patient mortality, allograft survival, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at the end of 1 year, and readmission rates while looking at treatment strategies among KTs with ESBL-GNR and non-ESBL-GNR bacteremia at our institution. METHODS: This study was a retrospective, cohort analysis of KTs with gram-negative bacteremia from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021. The primary outcome of the study was mortality. Patient outcomes were assessed for 365 days after positive blood cultures. RESULTS: The study included 63 patients. Of these, 18 (29%) patients had bacteremia caused by an ESBL-GNR and 45 (71%) patients had bacteremia caused by a non-ESBL-GNR. Patient survival at 90 days was 94% in the ESBL-GNR group and 96% in the non-ESBL-GNR group. Ciprofloxacin was the most common antimicrobial therapy at discharge (68.9%) in the non-ESBL-GNR group whereas ertapenem was the most common in the ESBL-GNR group (44.5%). Median eGFR at discharge was 41 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the ESBL-GNR group and 48 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the non-ESBL-GNR group. Ninety-day readmission occurred in 9 (50%) ESBL-GNR patients and 14 (32%) non-ESBL-GNR patients. None of the above comparisons are statistically significant (p > 0.05). Eleven (61%) ESBL-GNR and 2 (4%) non-ESBL-GNR patients used outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among KTs with ESBL-GNR bacteremia, no significant difference was detected in mortality or allograft function compared to non-ESBL-GNR bacteremia.

Hepatitis B prophylaxis among recipients of a hepatitis B core antibody positive liver transplant.

OBJECTIVE: Using organs from donors with a history of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has expanded the pool for solid organ transplant. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of HBV postexposure prophylaxis among recipients of a hepatitis B core antibody positive (HBcAb+) liver transplant and compare post-transplant outcomes with those who received a hepatitis B core antibody negative (HBcAb-) liver transplant. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center cohort analysis of liver transplant recipients at our institution. All adult liver transplant recipients between January 1, 2014, and August 30, 2020, were reviewed for inclusion. Recipients of an HBcAb+ organ who were administered antiviral therapy were matched 1:2 with recipients of an HBcAb- organ using propensity score matching. The primary outcome was breakthrough HBV infection. Secondary outcomes included graft survival, patient survival, and allograft rejection. Postexposure prophylaxis strategies for HBV were also assessed. Outcomes were analyzed for the first 12 months after transplant. RESULTS: Twenty-four HBcAb+ patients were matched to 48 HBcAb- patients. There were no documented cases of breakthrough HBV infection. Patient and graft survival was similar between both groups. Seven HBcAb+ patients (29%) experienced an episode of rejection within the first year compared with zero HBcAb- patients. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study suggest that current strategies for HBV postexposure prophylaxis are effective. Patient and graft survival rates at 30 days after transplant were similar to institutional reported values. Rejection was more prominent in the HBcAb+ group.

Eosinophilic pneumonia induced by ceftaroline.

PURPOSE: A case of eosinophilic pneumonia in a patient receiving ceftaroline for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia is reported. SUMMARY: A 65-year-old woman was admitted to a medical intensive care unit after arriving at the emergency room with complaints of progressively worsening shortness of breath. Her medical history included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory distress syndrome, recent traumatic brain injury, tobacco use, and alcohol abuse. Within the first few days of hospitalization, the patient was diagnosed with MRSA pneumonia based on microbiological data from bronchoscopy bronchial washings. Her renal function liver enzyme levels were within normal limits. Empirical antibiotic therapy included i.v. vancomycin and meropenem and was narrowed to i.v. linezolid monotherapy based on culture and sensitivity results. After 10 days of treatment with linezolid, the patient was persistently febrile, and cultures remained positive. It was decided to switch therapy to a course of i.v. ceftaroline, an anti-MRSA cephalosporin. On the fifth day of treatment with ceftaroline, the patient developed respiratory decompensation and peripheral eosinophilia of 40%. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) results indicated the presence of pulmonary eosinophilia of 13%. Chest radiographs revealed pulmonary infiltrates, and the computed tomography angiography showed no evidence of pulmonary embolism. Ceftaroline was discontinued, and the patient was started on vancomycin and methylprednisolone. The patient responded to methylprednisolone therapy, with repeat BAL and peripheral blood counts showing resolved eosinophilia. CONCLUSION: A patient with risk factors for respiratory disease developed eosinophilic pneumonia after receiving ceftaroline for the treatment of MRSA pneumonia. Eosinophilia resolved after ceftaroline was discontinued and i.v. methylprednisolone was initiated.