SBRT for Liver Tumors: What the Interventional Radiologist Needs to Know.

This review summarizes the clinical evidence supporting the utilization of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma, liver metastases, and cholangiocarcinoma. Emerging prospective evidence has demonstrated the benefit and low rates of toxicity across a broad range of clinical contexts. We provide an introduction for the interventional radiologist, with a discussion of underlying themes such as tumor dose-response, mitigation of liver toxicity, and the technical considerations relevant to performing liver SBRT. Ultimately, we recommend that SBRT should be routinely included in the armamentarium of locoregional therapies for liver malignancies, alongside those liver-directed therapies offered by interventional radiology.

Midterm outcomes of suture anchor fixation for displaced olecranon fractures.

BACKGROUND: Displaced olecranon fractures constitute a challenging problem for elbow surgeons. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of suture anchor fixation for treating patients with displaced olecranon fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for all consecutive patients with displaced olecranon fractures treated with suture anchor fixation with at least 2 years of clinical follow-up. Surgical repair was performed acutely in all cases with nonmetallic suture anchors in a double-row configuration utilizing suture augmentation via the triceps tendon. Osseous union and perioperative complications were uniformly assessed. RESULTS: Suture anchor fixation was performed on 17 patients with displaced olecranon fractures. Functional outcome scores were collected from 12 patients (70.6%). The mean age at the time of surgery was 65.6 years, and the mean follow-up was 5.6 years. Sixteen of 17 patients (94%) achieved osseous union in an acceptable position. No hardware-related complications or fixation failure occurred. Mean postoperative shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QuickDASH) score was 3.8±6.9, and mean Oxford Elbow Score was 47.5±1.0, with nine patients (75%) achieving a perfect score. CONCLUSIONS: Suture anchor fixation of displaced olecranon fractures resulted in excellent midterm functional outcomes. Additionally, this technique resulted in high rates of osseous union without any hardware-related complications or fixation failures. Level of evidence: IV.

Utilization of comorbidity indices to predict discharge destination and complications following total shoulder arthroplasty.

Background: Comorbidity indices can help identify patients at risk for postoperative complications. Purpose of this study was to compare different comorbidity indices to predict discharge destination and complications after shoulder arthroplasty. Methods: Retrospective review of institutional shoulder arthroplasty database of primary anatomic (TSA) and reverse (RSA) shoulder arthroplasties. Patient demographic information was collected in order to calculate Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), age adjusted CCI (age-CCI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system (ASA). Statistical analysis performed to analyze length of stay (LOS), discharge destination, and 90-day complications. Results: There were 1365 patients included with 672 TSA and 693 RSA patients. RSA patients were older and had higher CCI, age adjusted CCI, ASA, and mFI-5 (p < 0.001). RSA patients had longer lengths of stay (LOS), more likely to have an adverse discharge (p < 0.001), and higher reoperation rate (p = 0.003). Age-CCI was most predictive of adverse discharge (AUC 0.721, 95% CI 0.704-0.768). Discussion: Patients undergoing RSA had more medical comorbidities, experienced greater LOS, higher reoperation rate, and were more likely to have an adverse discharge. Age-CCI had the best ability to predict which patients were likely to require higher-level discharge planning.

Can Patients Accurately Recall their Preoperative Pain and Functional Scores Following Rotator Cuff Repair and Total Shoulder Arthroplasty?

Objectives: Accurate analysis of preoperative shoulder pain and function is important for understanding treatment efficacy and producing high-quality research. Oftentimes, preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are missing. Therefore the accuracy of recalled preoperative PROs may be important. We investigate the ability of patients who underwent rotator cuff repair (RCR) or shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) to recall their preoperative PROs. Methods: We identified 145 patients who underwent either RCR or TSA and had preoperative PROs. All patients completed the ASES, SANE, SST, and VAS surveys within 3 months prior to surgery. Patients were contacted between one and four years after surgery and asked to recall their baseline pain and shoulder function prior to surgery. The mean difference was calculated by determining the difference between the mean recalled score and the mean actual score. Intraobserver reliability analysis was performed, comparing recall and actual score for each using the 2-way mixed-effects intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) model. The ICC values > 0.75 were considered excellent, values between 0.4 and 0.75 were considered moderate, and values of < 0.4 demonstrated a weak agreement. Results: For patients who underwent RCR, the mean differences between actual and recalled ASES, SANE, SST and VAS pain were 6.3 (P=0.004), 2.0 (P=0.155), -0.04 (P=0.625) and - 1.0 (P<0.001), respectively. In patients who underwent TSA, the mean differences between actual and recalled ASES, SANE, SST and VAS pain were 4.5 (P =0.038), -3.9 (P=0.262), -1.2 (P=0.001) and -1.5 (P<0.001), respectively. ASES, SST, and VAS show moderate reliability, and SANE reliability was weak in both RCR and TSA populations. Patients had a tendency to recall higher pain scores than actual preoperative pain scores. Conclusion: In patients who underwent RCR or TSA, there was too much variability between individual patient's ability to accurately recall preoperative pain and function to reliably use recall data for research purposes.

Surgical Treatment of Shoulder Infection Following Rotator Cuff Repair.

Background: Deep infection after rotator cuff repair (RCR) can cause significant morbidity and healthcare burden. Outcomes of surgical treatment of infection following RCR are limited. This study aimed to assess the clinical course and outcomes related to surgical management of deep infection following RCR. Methods: Patients treated with debridement for infection after RCR at a single institution were included. Postoperative deep infection included the following criteria: persistent drainage more than five days from index surgery, development of a sinus tract to the joint, ≥ 2 positive cultures at the time of revision surgery with the same bacteria, or presence of purulence. Functional outcomes (ASES, SANE, SF-12) were assessed at a minimum of 1-year post-debridement. Results: Twenty-three patients were included and analyzed at mean six years post-debridement. All were free of infection at the final follow-up. The average age was 55 years; fifteen (65.2%) had infection after primary RCR and eight (34.8%) after revision RCR. Twelve (52.2%) patients required a repeat debridement prior to eradicating infection for an average of 1.9 surgeries before clearance of infection. Statistically significant predictors of need for a repeat debridement included initial open RCR (P = .02), open debridement (P = .002) and infection requiring IV antibiotics (P = .014). Postoperative ASES, SANE, SF-12M, SF-12P, and satisfaction scores were 71.7±25.7, 67.0±28.1, 55.5±6.5, 38.4±14.3 and 3.7±1.3, respectively. Conclusion: Deep infection after RCR can be treated with open or arthroscopic debridement. However, more than 50% of patients may require multiple debridements. Final functional results after infection control following RCR are satisfactory. However, chronic infection predicts worse functional outcomes.

Prior Acromioplasty Provides Similar Outcomes and Rate of Postoperative Complications Including Acromial Fracture After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Matched-Cohort Analysis.

Purpose: To compare outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in patients with prior arthroscopic acromioplasty versus a control group of patients with no history of acromioplasty. Methods: We performed a retrospective matched-cohort study of patients from a single institution who underwent RTSA with a history of acromioplasty from 2009 to 2017 with a minimum 2-year follow-up period. Patients' clinical outcomes were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score and Simple Shoulder Test, visual analog scale, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation surveys. Postoperative radiographs and patient charts were reviewed to determine whether patients sustained a postoperative acromial fracture. Charts were reviewed to determine range of motion and postoperative complications. Patients were matched on a 1:1 basis to a cohort of patients who underwent RTSA without a history of acromioplasty, and comparisons were performed using t and χ2 tests. Results: Forty-five patients who underwent RTSA with a history of acromioplasty met the inclusion criteria and completed the outcome surveys. There were no significant differences between cases and controls in post-RTSA American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, visual analog scale, Simple Shoulder Test, or Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation outcome scores. There was no difference in the postoperative acromial fracture rate between cases and controls (P = .577). Overall, more complications occurred in the study group (n = 6, 13.3%) compared with the control group (n = 4, 8.9%); however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = .737). Conclusions: After RTSA, patients who have undergone a prior acromioplasty have similar functional outcomes without a significant difference in the rate of postoperative complications compared with patients with no history of acromioplasty. Furthermore, previous acromioplasty does not increase the risk of acromial fracture after RTSA. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Factors associated with functional improvement after posteriorly augmented total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Posteriorly augmented glenoid components in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) address posterior glenoid bone loss with inconsistent results. The purpose of this study was to identify preoperative and postoperative factors that impact range of motion (ROM) and function after augmented TSA in patients with type B2 or B3 glenoid morphology. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent TSA with a step-type augmentation performed by a single surgeon between 2009 and 2018. Patients with Walch type B2 or B3 glenoids were included. Outcomes included forward elevation (FE), external rotation (ER), internal rotation (IR), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, and visual analog scale pain score. Preoperative imaging was reviewed to assess glenoid retroversion and posterior humeral head subluxation relative to the scapular body and midglenoid face. Postoperative measurements included glenoid retroversion, subluxation relative to the scapular body, subluxation relative to the central glenoid peg, and center-peg osteolysis. Measurements were performed by investigators blinded to ROM and functional outcome scores. RESULTS: Fifty patients (mean age, 68.1 ± 8.0 years) with a mean follow-up period of 42.0 months (range, 24-106 months) were included. Glenoid morphology included type B2 glenoids in 41 patients and type B3 glenoids in 9. One patient had center-peg osteolysis, and 1 patient had glenoid component loosening. Average preoperative FE, ER, and IR were 110°, 21°, and S1, respectively. Average postoperative FE, ER, and IR were 155°, 42°, and L1, respectively. The mean postoperative visual analog scale score was 0.5 ± 0.8, and the mean SANE score was 94.5 ± 5.6. Type B3 glenoids were associated with better postoperative IR compared with type B2 glenoids (T10 vs. L1, P = .024), with no other differences in ROM between the glenoid types. Preoperative glenoid retroversion did not significantly impact postoperative ROM. Postoperative glenoid component retroversion and residual posterior subluxation relative to the scapular body or glenoid face did not correlate with ROM in any plane. However, posterior subluxation relative to the glenoid face was moderately associated with lower SANE scores (r = -0.448, P = .006). CONCLUSION: Patients achieved excellent functional outcomes and pain improvement after TSA with an augmented glenoid component. Postoperative ROM and function showed no clinically important associations with preoperative or postoperative glenoid retroversion or humeral head subluxation in our cohort of posteriorly augmented TSAs, except for worse functional scores with increased humeral head subluxation in relation to the glenoid surface.

Periprosthetic joint infections of the shoulder: A 10-year retrospective analysis outlining the heterogeneity among these patients.

Background: Diagnosis and treatment of shoulder periprosthetic joint infection is a difficult problem. The purpose of this study was to utilize the 2018 International Consensus Meeting definition of shoulder periprosthetic joint infection to categorize revision shoulder arthroplasty cases and determine variations in clinical presentation by presumed infection classification. Methods: Retrospective review of patients undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty at a single institution. Likelihood of periprosthetic joint infection was determined based on International Consensus Meeting scoring. All patients classified as definitive or probable periprosthetic joint infection were classified as periprosthetic joint infection. All patients classified as possible or unlikely periprosthetic joint infection were classified as aseptic. The periprosthetic joint infection cohort was subsequently divided into culture-negative, non-virulent microorganism, and virulent microorganism cohorts based on culture results. Results: Four hundred and sixty cases of revision shoulder arthroplasty were reviewed. Eighty (17.4%) patients were diagnosed as definite or probable periprosthetic joint infection, of which 29 (36.3%), 39 (48.8%), and 12 (15.0%) were classified as virulent, non-virulent, or culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection, respectively. There were significant differences among periprosthetic joint infection subgroups with regard to preoperative C-reactive protein (p = 0.020), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p = 0.051), sinus tract presence (p = 0.008), and intraoperative purulence (p < 0.001). The total International Consensus Meeting criteria scores were also significantly different between the periprosthetic joint infection cohorts (p < 0.001). Discussion: While the diagnosis of shoulder periprosthetic joint infection has improved with the advent of International Consensus Meeting criteria, there remain distinct differences between periprosthetic joint infection classifications that warrant further investigation to determine the accurate diagnosis and optimal treatment.

Outcomes Following Different Fixation Strategies of Neer Type IIB Distal Clavicle Fractures.

Background: Multiple surgical techniques for fixation of Neer type IIB distal clavicle fractures have been described without consensus on optimal treatment. The purpose of this study is to compare functional and radiographic results with surgical management of Neer type IIB distal clavicle fractures at a single institution. Methods: Sixty-three patients with acute Neer type IIB fractures treated operatively were evaluated. Patients with a minimum of two year follow up were included. Functional scores included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Likert patient satisfaction (1 to 5). Radiographs were assessed for osseous union and coracoclavicular (CC) distance. Results: Thirty-eight patients met inclusion with a mean follow-up of 5.3 years. Patients were divided into five groups based on fixation technique: suture-only CC fixation (n=6), CC screw fixation only (n=3), open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) without CC fixation (n=8), hook plate fixation (n=4), and ORIF with suture CC reconstruction (n=17). Outcome scores for the entire cohort were 91.8 for ASES, 90.2 for SANE, and 10.8 for STT. Patients with hook plates had significantly lower SANE score (p=0.016), but no other significant differences in functional, satisfaction, or radiographic outcomes were found between groups. Sixteen patients (42.1%) required reoperation. Conclusion: Treatment of Neer type IIB fractures via suture- only fixation, plate-only fixation, or a combination of both demonstrated satisfactory mid to long term outcomes. While implant removal was more common in the CC screw and ORIF groups, no fixation technique proved functionally superior.

Radiographic Severity May Not be Associated with Pain and Function in Glenohumeral Arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the routine use of plain radiographs to stratify the severity of glenohumeral osteoarthritis, little is known about the relationship between radiographic measures and patient-perceived pain and function. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What radiographic findings are associated with worse pain and function in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis? (2) What demographic factors are associated with worse pain and function in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis? METHODS: This retrospective study included patients presenting for an initial office visit for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Patients with other concurrent shoulder pathologic findings, prior surgery, lack of pain and functional scores, recent injection, or inadequate radiographs were excluded. Between January 2017 and January 2019, 3133 patients were eligible based on these inclusion criteria; 59% (1860) had outcome assessments and 48% (893) of those had radiographs. An additional 42% (378) of those with radiographs were excluded because of other shoulder findings, recent injection, prior surgery, or inadequate radiographs, leaving 16% (515 of 3133) who were fully analyzed in this study. A radiographic review included the joint space width, posterior humeral head subluxation, inferior humeral head osteophyte size, cystic change, and head asphericity. Additionally, radiographic arthritis was classified according to the Walch, Samilson-Prieto, and Kellgren-Lawrence classifications by two separate reviewers. Radiographic and demographic criteria as well as the presence of psychologic or mental illness were correlated with VAS Pain (range 1-10; minimal clinically important difference [MCID] 1.6), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES; range 0-100; MCID 13.6), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE; range 0-100; MCID 14), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST; range 0-12; MCID 1.5) scores using univariate and multivariable regression analyses. RESULTS: After accounting for age, gender, and psychologic illness in the multivariable analysis, we found that patients with Samilson-Prieto Grade 4 arthrosis had lower VAS Pain scores (ß = -1.9; p = 0.02) than those with Grade 0 or 1 did; however, no clinically important associations were found between Samilson-Prieto Grade 4 and ASES (ß = 7; p = 0.25), SANE (ß = 4; p = 0.63), or SST (ß = 0.5; p = 0.62) scores. No clinically important associations were found between Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 3 and VAS Pain (ß = 1.4; p = 0.10), ASES (ß = -8; p = 0.22), SANE (ß = -13; p = 0.11), or SST scores (ß = 0.4; p = 0.66). Radiographic joint space and posterior subluxation also did not have any clinically important associations with VAS Pain or functional scores. In assessing Walch glenoid type, there was no clinically important association between glenoid type and VAS Pain (F = 3.1; p < 0.01), ASES (F = 1.9; p = 0.15), SANE (F = 0.45; p = 0.66), or SST scores (F = 0.76; p = 0.71). Men had higher SST scores than women did (ß = 2.0; p < 0.01), but there were no clinically important differences in VAS Pain (ß = -0.4; p = 0.04), ASES (ß = 6; p < 0.01), or SANE (ß = 4; p = 0.07) scores. No clinically important association was found between age or the presence of any psychologic illness and VAS Pain or functional scores. CONCLUSION: In patients with glenohumeral arthritis, no consistent clinically important differences in pain or function were discovered with respect to radiographic or demographic factors. Surgeons should understand that the pain levels of patients with glenohumeral arthritis may not parallel radiographic severity. Future studies can build on these findings by examining other non-radiographic or demographic factors that affect pain in patients with shoulder arthritis, such as psychological factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.